The Realty Assoc., et al, vs. Richter/Dial Builders, Inc., et al
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Lyons vs. Farmers Insurance, et al
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Williams vs. Berube & Assoc., et al
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
Parkey vs. Parkey
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Kanbi vs. Sousa
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bomar vs. TN Dept. of Mental Health
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ground For a Petition To Rehear. See Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587, 618,
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Christopher Scott Wells, v. Betty Sue Wells
Christopher Scott Wells (“Father”) and Betty Sue Wells (“Mother”) divorced in October 1997. By the terms of their Marital Dissolution Agreement (MDA), the parties had joint custody of the two children with Mother as primary custodian. Shortly after the MDA was accepted by the court, Father changed his mind. He sought custody of the children based on Mother’s relationships with men. The trial court found no change in circumstances and left custody with Mother. Because of evidence of the children’s altered behavior during their visit with Father, we find it necessary to remand the case to the trial court for a determination of the best interests of the children, including the comparative fitness of the parents at the time of the hearing on remand. |
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Charlotte Brown, v. Birman Managed Care, David N. Birman, Sue d. Birman, William F. Barenkamp, II, and Kathy Barenkamp
The divorced mother of a minor child claimed that her former husband and his employer conspired to fraudulently understate the husband’s income, in order to defeat her attempts to have his child support obligation increased to an appropriate amount. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We reverse. |
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Janie Cousett
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brandon Bills
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Wanda Bledsoe
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Also State v. Mixon, 983 S.W.2D 661, 668-71 (Tenn. 1999). As a Result, The Trial Court
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Moore
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
W1999-1977-CCA-R3-CD
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Frank Massengill
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John M. Johnson
|
Tipton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9906-CR-00227
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9905-CR-00200
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Wayne Leroy Evans
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Judy Lynn Patterson Conner, v. Billy Ray Conner
In this divorce action the wife has appealed and raises issues as to the amount of the alimony award and the division of marital property. The husband objects to an aw ard o f alimony in futuro and the Order requiring him to pay $2,047.20for the w ife’s atto rney’s fees. |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Wayna Shadwick v. Shirley Young and Betty Thompson and F.H. Showmaker Distributors, Inc.
The essence of this appeal is whether a judgment creditor of an estate should be permitted to intervene in a marital/familial matter. |
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
Leslie A. Lewis, v. John S. Muchmore and Virginia L. Muchmore
Leslie A. Lewis filed a detainer warrant in the General Sessions Court of Shelby County against John S. Muchmore and Virginia Muchmore alleging forcible entry and detainer (FED)1 or unlawful detainer. The court entered judgment for possession only and the Muchmores appealed to circuit court where the Muchmores brought a counter-complaint for specific performance of a real estate contract. Following a bench trial, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, Leslie A. Lewis, restoring her to possession of the subject premises and dismissing the countercomplaint. This appeal resulted. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Eugene Lamb, James Morris Lofton, et al. v. MegaFlight Inc., a Florida Corp., Ronald Rosenburg, et al., - Concurring
Lamb, Lee, Lofton, and Bailey (“Plaintiffs” or “Phoenix”) brought suit alleging breach of contract and fraudulent inducement in the Chancery Court of McNairy County, Tennessee. MegaFlight, Rosenberg, and Noel (“MegaFlight”) filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because a forum selection clause in the contract specified that any action must be brought in the courts of Orange County, Florida. The trial court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs appeal. Based upon the following, we reverse the lower court’s grant of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. |
McNairy | Court of Appeals | |
David Chenault, v. Jeff L. Walker, Jo Bursey, Jack L. Moore, Ocean Inn, Inc., and Dimension III Financial Inc.
This case deals with in personam jurisdiction under the Tennessee Long Arm 1 This Court originally denied the application for interlocutory appeal. The Supreme Court granted the appellant’s T.R.A.P. 11 application for permission to appeal and remanded the case to this Court for a review on the merits. 2 Also named as a defendant is Jeff L. Walker, but he is not involved in this interlocutory appeal. 2 Statute and comes to this Court as a T.R.A.P. interlocutory appeal.1 Defendants, Jo Bursey (Bursey), Jack L. Moore (Moore), Ocean Inn, Inc. (Ocean Inn), and Dimension III Financial, Inc. (Dimension III)2, appeal the order of the trial court denying their motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals |