Opinions
Frankie Pauline Maples vs. Frank Allen Maples
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Scott Graham Hartman, Kay Hartman, his mother and duly qualified conservator and guardian, and Cleon Hartman, v. The University of Tennessee and State of Tennessee
For the second time, the claimants appeal a decision of the Tennessee Claims Commission deny ing them recovery from the University of Tennessee and the State of Tennessee of $1,026,666 in medical expenses allegedly paid by BellSouth Corporation under an ERISA plan with BellSouth alleged to be subrogee of such pay ments. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ahmad Ben Nama and Kahled Abed v. Aymanayoub, d/b/a Limited Auto Sales - Concurring
This is an appeal from the chancellor’s denial of Defendant’s motion to alter or amend findings of fact. The question to be answered is whether the “newly discovered evidence rule” would allow the presentation post-trial of evidence which the proponent concedes he could have produced at trial. The defendant contends that evidence which tends to show misrepresentation on the part of a nonmovant should be allowed under a motion pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 52, 59 and 60 regardless of whether it was discoverable at trial. Under the circumstances of the case at bar, we cannot agree. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
David Frounfelker v. Identity Group, Inc.
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
W1999-02113-CCA-R3-CD
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Peter Ross
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Mark Bryan
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00044
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00121
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9807-CC-00257
|
Jefferson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
E1999-00332-C0A-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-01782-C0A-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-01346-C0A-R3-CV
|
Monroe | Court of Appeals | |
Francis Ione Lethcoe, et al vs. Ricky Ray Holden, et ux , et al
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-00590-COA-RC-CV
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
Vera Elizabeth Thomas vs. Kenneth Lamar Thomas
In this divorce action, the husband appealed from the award of alimony |
Court of Appeals | ||
Vera Elizabeth Thomas vs. Kenneth Lamar Thomas
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-00686-COA-R7-CV
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Stacy Allen Bullard
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darrell Baker
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Rudy Wendell Myers vs. State
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Karon Spicer vs. James Spicer
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. James Matthew Lawrence
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Vincent Sims
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Vincent Sims
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals |