COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Dillon vs. State
01A01-9701-BC-00020

Ruff vs. Traughber
01A01-9702-CH-00074
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Hunter vs. Anderson
01A01-9701-CV-00024
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall

Tomlinson vs. Traughber
01A01-9703-CH-00143
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Flowers vs. Metro Baptist Schools
01A01-9705-CH-00219
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

The City of White House vs. Whitley, et. al.
01A01-9612-CH-00571
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray

The City of White House vs. Whitley, et. al.
01A01-9612-CH-00571

Gates, Duncan & Vancamp Co., et al vs. Richard Levantino
02A01-9605-CH-00095

Marles Flowers vs. Memphis Housing Authority
02A01-9610-CV-00240
Trial Court Judge: Wyeth Chandler

Susan Turner v. Jeffrey Purvis
M2002-00023-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Michael R. Jones
Mother appeals from a trial court modification of the custody and visitation arrangement which had been in place since the divorce in 1997. The previous arrangement gave Mother primary residential custody, and Father was to have liberal visitation as agreed upon by the parties. After declining to adopt the parenting plan submitted by either Mother or Father, the trial court devised a plan establishing a specific residential schedule. Mother argues that there was not a material change of circumstances that warranted the trial court's decision. Because we determine that a material change in circumstances occurred and because the modification of the custody arrangement was in the best interests of the children, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Jammi vs. Conley
01A01-9609-CH-00425
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Bain vs. City of Murfreesboro
01A01-9611-CV-00510
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Aghili vs. Saadatnejadi
01A01-9605-CV-00214
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Henderson vs. Harlan, d/b/a: Lodge Quarters
01A01-9610-CV-00463
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Wood vs. Prosser, et. al.
01A01-9510-CV-00468
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
03C01-9602-CC-00066
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

Glenda Whisenhunt vs. Gordon Whisenhunt
02A01-9506-CV-00126
Trial Court Judge: James E. Swearengen

David Dunnehew vs. Donna Dunnehew
02A01-9604-CH-00079

Thelma W. Kelley, v. John E. Vance and Betty L. Vance, and Allstate Insurance Company
03A01-9701-CV-00031
Authoring Judge: Justice Herschel Pickens Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Ben W. Hooper, II

In this action, plaintiff seeks uninsured motorist coverage from her insurance company, and the Trial Court, responding to motion for summary judgment, granted judgment to defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Plaintiff has appealed.

Pacific Properties, v. Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, v. Michael S. Stalcup
03A01-9701-CV-00020
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Judge William R. Holt, Jr.

This action for conversion was submitted to a jury which returned a general verdict for the plaintiff, thereby implicitly finding that the fact-driven principal defense of the Statute of Limitations was not well-taken. Home Federal appeals and presents for review issues which, as paraphrased, question the propriety of the submission of the case to the jury, whether the defense of Statute of Limitations was well-taken, as a matter of law, whether requested jury instructions should have been given and whether the drawer of a check adequately instructed the drawee Bank as to its disposition. Pacific Properties

First Tennessee Bank, National Association, v. Jessi O. Quillian
03A01-9701-CH-00014
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor R. Vann Owens

This case originated as an action to collect monies due under the terms of a promissory note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff First Tennessee Bank, National Association. An answer was filed by the defendant admitting the execution of the note and that there was an outstanding balance thereon. He also filed a counterclaim in which he sought a setoff and damages for forged checks drawn on his account and paid by the bank. The trial court on motion of the plaintiff, entered a summary judgment against the defendant on the original complaint and dismissed the counterclaim. A judgment in the amount of $34,399.24 was entered against the defendant. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Keith Hardware, Inc. v. Douglas L. White and Carolyn L. White - Concurring
03A01-9610-CH-00339
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Lewis W. May

The issue on this interlocutory appeal granted pursuant to T. R. A. P. Rule 9, is whether the lease between the parties is too broad to be enforceable, as was held by the Trial Court.

Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk
03A01-9701-CV-00037
Authoring Judge: Justice Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.

In this action arisitn grom a motor vehicle accident, the defendants were granted summary judgment and plaintiffs have appealed.

Crystal M. Trueitt v. Alan A. McCurry and Carmen Y. Silvels, v. Alan A. McCurry
03A01-9612-CV-00399
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston P. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Samuel H. Payne

Crystal M. Trueitt and Carmen Y. Silvels, individually and as mother and next friend of Christopher M. Silvels, a minor,2 appeal jugements rendered in heir favor in the Circuit Court for Hamilton County in the amount of $1,033.36, $1,004.60, and $98.50, respectively.