Dukes vs. State
|
Morgan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Overstreet
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Steve Maddox v. Insurance Co. of Penn. and Second Injury Fund
|
Robertson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Durham vs. Durham
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Carlton Agib Blessing, deceased
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Johnny Lawrence
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carlos Haywood
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Keith Smith
|
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Anthony Hodges
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Christopher Chatman vs. State
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Jones vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Stone
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gary W. Phelps vs. David Mills
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In Hicks v. State, 945 S.W.2D 706 (Tenn. 1997), The Supreme Court Held That
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Talley
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Majors vs. State
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darryl Bailey
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Bucy
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
J.C. Bradford vs. Southern Realty
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Rathal Perkins
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ronnie Graham
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Cliff
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. George Washington
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Walter Wilson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James R. Reynolds, v. Tennessee Board of Parole, et al.
This appeal involves an inmate’s challenge to the denial of his application for parole by the Tennessee Board of Paroles. After serving approximately ten years ofa 35-year sentence for aggravated rape, the inmate filed a petition for a common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County asserting that the Tennessee Board of Paroles was illegally and arbitrarily declining to honor his plea bargain agreement. The trial court dismissed the petition on the grounds that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and because it was not timely filed. The inmate has appealed pro se. We concur that the petition was not timely filed and affirm its dismissal in accordance with Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10(b).1 |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |