Ricky Garrett v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from a burglary conviction, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he received the effective assistance of trial counsel. He contends that trial counsel failed to provide information that was essential for him to make informed decisions in his case and failed to present an adequate defense at trial, and that the cumulative effect of the alleged deficiencies in counsel's performance was to prejudice the outcome of his case. We affirm the denial of the petition for post-conviction relief. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jimmy L. Slatton
The defendant, Jimmy L. Slatton, pleaded guilty to attempted aggravated sexual battery and agreed to a six-year sentence. The plea agreement provided that the trial court would determine the manner of service of the sentence. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court denied any form of alternative sentencing and imposed incarceration in the Department of Correction. From this determination, the defendant appeals. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jimmy L. Slatton
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Steve V. Walker v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his sentence was illegal because: (1) he was improperly sentenced as a persistent offender; (2) his sentence was improperly enhanced because he did not receive the State's notice of intent to seek enhanced punishment; (3) the record of his prior criminal convictions relied upon to sentence him was inaccurate; and (4) his counsel was ineffective. The trial court denied the Petitioner's request for habeas corpus relief, and the Petitioner appealed. Because the Petitioner has failed to allege grounds that would warrant habeas corpus relief, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Larry Patterson v. Premier Medical Group, P. C.,
|
Houston | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Dept. of Children's Services v. C.M.S.
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Behi Hamidy v. W. Dyrk Halstead
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Karen Gale Engel v. Jerry Burton Young, Sr.
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Jerry L. Johns v. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Kelley McEvoy v. Kimberly Brewer
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Dan Johnson v. Department of Correction
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Kelly Lee Crawford, et al. v. Brian C. Beatt
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Wayne Fuller v. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Wayne Fuller v. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Deborah Coates v. Thomas Coates
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Jabari Issa Mandela v. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
J.D. Hickman v. Board of Parole
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State v. John Phillips
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Marshall Moffett v. Dept. of Correction
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Danelle Harvey
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Washshukru Al-Jabbar A'La vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Washshukru Al-Jabbar A'La vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
In Re: Sanford & Sons Bail Bonds, Inc.
The appellant, Sanford & Sons Bail Bonds, Inc., appeals the judgment of the Hamblen County Criminal Court forfeiting $5,000 bail in the case of criminal defendant Florentino DeJesus Hernandez. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In Re: The Adoption of D.P.M.
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jody Alan Ferguson
On November 9, 1999, the Appellant, Jody Alan Ferguson, pled guilty to nine counts of forgery in the Obion County Circuit Court and was sentenced to two years of community corrections after service of thirty days confinement in the county jail. On March 9, 2000, Ferguson pled guilty to four counts of forgery and received an effective sentence of two years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. Ferguson's placement in the community corrections program was revoked and his nine two-year sentences were ordered to be served in the Department of Correction concurrently with his March 9th sentences. On June 21, 2000, Ferguson was granted determinate release by the Department of Correction for the series of two-year sentences imposed on November 9, 1999, and March 9, 2000, and he was returned to supervised probation. On June 26, 2000, Ferguson again pled guilty to two counts of forgery and received concurrent two-year suspended sentences to be served concurrently to all outstanding sentences previously imposed. On August 28, 2001, probation violation warrants were issued against Ferguson. The warrants alleged that Ferguson had violated the following conditions: (1) failed to report to the probation officer; (2) failed to pay supervision fees; (3) failed to pay restitution and court costs; and (4) failed to perform community service work. On November 9, 2001, the trial court revoked Ferguson's probationary status and ordered him to serve the remainder of his two-year sentences in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, Ferguson does not contest the trial court's finding that he violated the terms of his probation. Rather, Ferguson argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not again placing him on probation or community corrections. After review, we find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Obion | Court of Criminal Appeals |