State vs. Curtis R. Sparks
|
Perry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Quincy L. Love v. State of Tennessee
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Alphonso Bradford v. State of Tennessee
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9508-CC-00232
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Willie H. Johnson
This is an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. A Shelby County jury found the Defendant guilty of burglary. The trial judge found the Defendant to be a career offender and sentenced him to twelve years in the Department of Correction. In this appeal, he argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Petitioner, Relying In Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9508-CC-00269
|
Wayne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9510-CR-00337
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9505-CR-00130
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CC-00334
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9511-CC-00368
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9412-CC-00265
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9412-CC-00265
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9411-CC-00245
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00146
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9507-CR-00179
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9509-CR-00277
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9510-CC-00307
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9605-CR-00173
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Richard Higgs
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CR-00330
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James J. Benson, v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, James J. Benson, appeals as of right from the Williamson County Circuit Court's denial of post-conviction relief. He is presently in the custody of the Department of Correction, serving as a Range II, multiple offender, an effective sentence of one hundred and twenty-eight years for convictions of two counts of aggravated kidnaping and one count each of armed robbery, conspiracy, and accessory before the fact to armed robbery, receiving a sentence of sixty years for each of the crimes except the conspiracy, for which he received a sentence of eight years. The convictions and sentences were affirmed on direct appeal on September 7, 1987, and reaffirmed on a petition to rehear on February 16, 1990. State v. Bobby Mitchell, Richard Cook, and James Benson, Williamson County, No. 87-185-III (Tenn. Crim. App. Sept. 27, 1989), app. denied, (Tenn. April 2, 1990). |
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Gentry
The defendant, Michael Gentry, entered a plea of guilt to one count of official misconduct. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-402(a)(5). Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court imposed a Range I sentence of two years and granted probation but denied the defendant's request for judicial diversion. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-313; State v. Dishman, 915 S.W.2d 458 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). In this appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to grant judicial diversion; he also insists that the district attorney general was guilty of prosecutorial vindictiveness. |
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Mario A. Lavender and Eric L. Hobbs
The appellants, Mario A. Lavender and Eric Hobbs, were found guilty of two counts of robbery, a Class C felony, and one count of theft over $1,000, a Class D felony, by a jury of their peers. The trial court found that Lavender was a standard offender and imposed Range I sentences as follows: (1) count 1, robbery, confinement for six (6) years in the Department of Correction, (2) count 2, robbery, confinement for six (6) years in the Department of Correction, and (3) count 4, theft, confinement for four (4) years in the Department of Correction. The trial court found that Hobbs was a multiple offender and imposed the following Range II sentences: (1) count 1, robbery, confinement for ten (10) years in the Department of Correction, (2) count 2, robbery, confinement for ten (10) years in the Department of Correction, and (3) count 4, theft, confinement for four (4) years in the Department of Correction. The trial court ordered that the sentences are to be served consecutively. The effective sentence for Lavender is sixteen (16) years, and the effective sentence for Hobbs is twenty-four (24) years. In this Court, both Lavender and Hobbs contend that the sentences imposed by the trial court are excessive. Hobbs also contends that the trial court committed error of prejudicial dimensions by (a) denying his motion to suppress a statement he made to police and (b) denying his motion in limine, which sought to deny the State of Tennessee the right to use his prior convictions to impeach him if he opted to testify. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the law applicable to the issues presented for review, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles Thompson And Verico
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals |
