State of Tennessee v. Timothy Williams
In this appeal of right from the Shelby County Criminal Court, the defendant contends that his de novo appeal from a judgment of the General Sessions Court was erroneously dismissed at a status hearing. Because the Criminal Court Clerk failed to provide notice of the status hearing to defendant's counsel of record, the judgment of dismissal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a hearing. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Montrell Perry
The appellant entered guilty pleas to two counts of sale of cocaine, Class C felonies, and was sentenced to four years confinement in the Department of Correction. The appellant argues, in this direct appeal, that the trial court erred in ordering total confinement. The record supports denial of an alternative sentence. The judgment is affirmed. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Daryl Robinson
The defendant, Daryl McKinley Robinson, appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his probationary sentence and order that he serve his effective 14-year, 11-month, 29-day sentence in the Department of Correction. In this appeal, he complains that the trial court erred in failing to make findings regarding whether his failure to pay fines and costs was willful or a result of lack of bona fide efforts to acquire the resources to pay. He further complains that the trial court erred in ordering him to serve his sentence in incarceration, rather than the Community Corrections program. Upon review, we find no abuse of discretion warranting a reversal of the court’s order and therefore affirm. |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Anderson Peek, alias Big Country, alias Michael Peak alias Michael Anderson Peak
The defendant was convicted of fourteen felonies, consisting of various rape, robbery, and burglary charges arising from complaints of five victims. He received an effective sentence of ninety-nine years. Appealing these convictions, he alleged, inter alia, that the trial court should have severed the offenses, rather than allowing all five to be tried in a single trial; that blood, saliva, and hair samples should have been suppressed; that he should not have been shackled during the trial, and that his sentence was improper. Of these assignments, we find error in the trial court’s allowing the complaints of all five victims to be tried in a single trial, and in the court’s not following the required procedures before shackling the defendant during the trial. The errors were harmless and, accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Leon Goins
A jury found the defendant guilty of selling 0.5 grams of cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance. He received a 15 year sentence as a Range II offender, consecutive to a prior felony. The defendant asserts error in allowing the state’s expert witness to testify to the aggregate weight of cocaine sold, when the witness did not test every particle of the submitted evidence. The defendant further asserts error in the trial court’s admitting a video tape of the sale and in the trial court’s sentencing. The judgment from the trial court is affirmed. |
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Carlos C. Beasley
The appellant, Carlos C. Beasley, referred herein as “the defendant,” appeals as of right from a conviction for especially aggravated robbery by a Shelby County jury. The same jury found the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter, from which the defendant does not appeal. The Shelby County Criminal Court imposed a sentence of twenty-five (25) years for especially aggravated robbery in the Department of Correction. The defendant presents two appellate issues: 1) whether the evidence is sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find that every element of especially aggravated robbery has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and 2) whether the record shows that the trial court in its capacity as thirteenth (13th) juror failed to independently weigh the evidence upon consideration of the motion for a new trial. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Brumit
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robert Bassett Brown
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Samuel D. Land
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Donald Curtis Reid
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David C. Vazquez
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jerry Ray Chandler
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jason C. Carter, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Rodney Ford
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Teddrick Williamson
|
Tipton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Carroll
|
Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Halley Thompson
|
Chester | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Elizabeth Mullins
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Derrick Vernon, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robert Rainey
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Lisa Marie Garren
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Harold Wayne Nichols vs. State
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Ronnie Ray Hoover vs. State
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Delores Babb
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sammie Eugene Smith vs. state
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals |