Stafford vs. Stafford
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
Nations Bank N.A. South, v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD.
This is an action to collect 21 promissory notes executed by the defendant in 1985, 1986, and 1987, payable to USA Fairfield Realty Fund, LTD. and assigned to Citizens Federal Bank, N.A., on order, on December 20, 1991, without recourse. Appendix A is a diagrammatic explanation of the commercial lineage of the defendant. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Russell vs. Mid-South Insurance et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Turner vs. TN Board of Paroles
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Oakley (Wilson) vs. Wilson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Allen vs. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Smith vs. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Baldwin et al vs. Pirelli Armstrong et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Barbara Jordan vs. Sofamor S.N.C.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9804-CV-
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Bradson Mercantile vs. Joseph Crabtree
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Joleen Creson vs. Tammy Creson
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
McNairy Co. vs. John Sellers
|
McNairy | Court of Appeals | |
Schleicher vs. Founders Security Life Ins. Co.
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
In the matter of: Kristalena Kay Smith et al
|
White | Court of Appeals | |
Worth vs. Cumberland Mt. Property Owners
|
Cumberland | Court of Appeals | |
D.D. Roberts, D/B/A Roberts Construction Co., et al. v.Tommy Yarbrough, et al., Thomas Lumber Co., Inc. v. Naran Patel, et al., and Tommy Yarbrough, et al.
Two subcontractors recovered judgments for work done on a construction project in Clarksville. On appeal the general contractor and the surety on his bond allege that the appellees were not licensed contractors and that neither complied with the notice of nonpayment statute. In addition, the appellant disputes the trial court’s version of the proof and the award of prejudgment interest. We affirm the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Gordon Carroll and Ora Hall, v. John W. Belcher and Frankie Belcher
This appeal involves an easement for ingress and egress. The defendants, John and Frankie Belcher (Belcher), appeal the decision of the trial court granting the plaintiffs, Gordon Carroll (Carroll) and Ora Hall (Hall), the right to widen an easement running over their property. |
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Pamela L. Schenk, v. Raymond F. Lane
Defendant Raymond D. Lane appeals a jury verdict awarding $297,000.00 to Plaintiff Pamela L. Schenk for injuries sustained as a result of an automobile accident occurring between Lane and Schenk. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in all respects. |
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Daniel B. Taylor v. State of Tennessee, John Doe, State Coordinator of Elections, Ms. Bobbie White, Shelby County Registrar of Voters; and Charles W. Burson, Atty General
The only question presented in this complaint is whether a law making all felonies infamous crimes can, upon conviction, be applied to crimes committed before the date of the act. The Chancery Court of Davidson County dismissed the plaintiff’s request for a declaratory judgment. We affirm. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
William H. Lance, Emma Lee Lance v. Larry H. Street, D/B/A Street Construction
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, ex rel., Doug Sizemore, Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance for the State of Tennessee, v. United Physicians Insurance Risk Retention Group - Concurring
I concur with the court’s opinion. Insurance companies have the right to assume that the risk they undertake will not later be enlarged by the courts. See Schultz v. Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co., 218 Tenn. 465, 474, 404 S.W.2d 480, 484 (1966). Accordingly, the courts are not at liberty to rewrite policies of insurance to provide coverage where no coverage was intended. See Spears v. Commercial Ins. Co., 866 S.W.2d 544, 548(Tenn. Ct. App. 1993). Dr. Johnson did not contract for prior acts coverage when he purchased his UPI insurance policy. Accordingly, UPI never provided coverage for claims such as Blendora Ann Echols. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Robert S. Lipman v. First National Bank of Boston, and Alexander H. McNeil, J. Virginia McNeil, R. & J. Knoxville - Concurring
The trial court granted the motion of defendant First National Bank of Boston (“First National”) for summary judgment, which the plaintiff (“Lipman”] appeals, insisting that there are genuine issues of material fact. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Glenda Wright Benning v. James Russell Benning
In this divorce case, Glenda Benning (wife) challenges the trial court's award of permanent alimony to James Benning (husband). After the file filed for divorce and the parties separated, the hisband moved into the same apartment with one Jaylene Deen. On appeal, the wife argues that the tril court erred in finding that the statutory presumption fond at T.C .A . § 36 - 5 - 10 1 ( a ) ( 3 ) had been rebutted by the evidence presented by the husband. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |