COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Mayfield vs. Mayfield
01A01-9611-CV-00501

Court of Appeals

Mayfield vs. Mayfield
01A01-9611-CV-00501
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Davidson Court of Appeals

First Farmers & Merchants Nat'l. Bank vs. Burt Bros. Furniture
01A01-9608-CV-00381
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton

Maury Court of Appeals

McCamey vs. TN. Dept. of Correction
01A01-9701-CH-00033
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9610-CV-00496
01A01-9610-CV-00496
Trial Court Judge: Buddy D. Perry

Franklin Court of Appeals

Seagroves vs. TN. Department of Correction
01A01-9508-CH-00334
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Davidson Court of Appeals

Out Patient Diagnostic Center vs. Christian
01A01-9510-CV-00467
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Davidson Court of Appeals

Out Patient Diagnostic Center vs. Christian
01A01-9510-CV-00467

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Bedford Court of Appeals

Copper Cellar vs. Miller
03A01-9607-CV-00239

Knox Court of Appeals

Williams vs. Sugar Cove
03A01-9605-CH-00175

Monroe Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

David Dean vs. Home Depot USA, Inc.
M1999-02313-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Soloman
Plaintiff, David Dean, was a 68 year old frequent patron of Home Depot. On April 27, 1997, Mr. Dean completed his shopping at the store, paid the cashier and, upon departing, appeared to have set off the electric theft detection alarm. An employee of Home Depot stopped Mr. Dean and asked him to step back into the store while employees located the source of whatever triggered the alarm. Mr. Dean was neither arrested nor charged and ultimately left the store. He brought suit against Home Depot for false imprisonment resulting in a jury verdict in his favor for $37,593.00. On Motion for a New Trial, asking in the alternative for remittitur, the trial court reduced the judgment by $3,000.00. Defendant appealed. Upon consideration of the record, we suggest an increased remittitur and remand the case giving Mr. Dean 15 days to accept the suggested remittitur.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Bondy vs. Martin
03A01-9609-JV-00310

Monroe Court of Appeals

Bondy vs. Martin
03A01-9609-JV-00310

Monroe Court of Appeals

Duffey vs. Lee, et. al.
01A01-9607-CH-00324
Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell

Marshall Court of Appeals

Moon vs. St. Thomas Hospital
01A01-9609-CV-00389
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9702-CH-00052
01A01-9702-CH-00052
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Davidson Court of Appeals

Baptist Hospital, East , et. al. vs. TN. Dept. of Health, et. al.
01A01-9610-BC-00465
Trial Court Judge: Samuel L. Lewis

Court of Appeals

Walker, et. al. vs. Bd. of Education of Wilson Co.
01A01-9610-CH-00497
Trial Court Judge: Robert W. Wedemeyer

Wilson Court of Appeals

Price vs. TN. Civil Service Comm.
01A01-9508-CH-00336
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Smith, et. al. vs. The Castner-Knott Dry Goods
01A01-9512-CV-00554
Trial Court Judge: William C. Koch

Davidson Court of Appeals