Opinions
State vs. Carlito Adams
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Vanderford
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Newton vs. Tinsley
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Robin vs. Seaton
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Terri Demilt vs. Methodist Hosp., et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Suzanne Gibson vs. James Prokell
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Tennessee Municipal League vs. Brook Thompson
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Jose Holmes
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sprinkle vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Russell vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
McManamay vs. McManamay
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Keith Scarbrough vs. State
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Rippy
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bill Teal
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Knapp
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Watson vs. Ameredes
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Thurman vs. Thurman
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Oneida vs. Oneida
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9708-CH-
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Gloria E. Hill-Evans v. Bredell Michael Evans, Sr.
In this divorce action brought by Gloria E. Hill-Evans (Mother) against Bredell Michael Evans, Sr. (Father), the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ two minor sons to Mother with Father to have reasonable visitation. However, the trial court’s decree further provided that visitation be suspended “until both of the parties and the children have completed a counseling program which is satisfactory to the court, and the court has been furnished a report that the counseling course has been successfully completed. When the counseling process has been successfully completed, the court will consider the defendant’s visitation rights.” |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Wade Spurling D.C. v. Kirby Parkway Chiropractic, et al
The plaintiff, Wade Spurling, D.C., appeals from the order of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) T.R.C.P. Spurling filed a complaint titled “Complaint For Deceit in Inducement to Contract, Promissory Fraud, Fraud, Intentional Interference With Performance ofContractual Obligations and Breach of Contract.” The complaint alleges that Plaintiff owned and operated Spurling Chiropractic Clinic (SCC). He entered into negotiations with Defendant Michael K. Plambeck (Plambeck) for Plambeck to purchase SCC. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
James Walter Dellinger, v. The Arnold Engineering Company and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Larry Brinton, Jr., Director of the Second Injury Fund
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Napoleon Momon vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Napoleon Momon, appeals pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s denial of post-conviction relief. The petitioner was convicted in 1991 of second degree murder in the shooting death of his wife, Jacqueline Daniel Momon, and received a twenty-five-year sentence.1 His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal to this Court. State v. Napoleon Momon, No. 03C01-9205-CR-00174 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, Nov. 20, 1992). |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Anthony Noe
VANDALISM CONVICTION AFFIRMED; FALSE REPORT CONVICTION REVERSED |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |