State vs. Brent Brown
02C01-9710-CC-00419

Loyal Featherstone Constru. vs. Robert Coleman
02A01-9709-CH-00213
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

Chrisman vs. Hill Home Development et al
03S01-9706-CV-00077

Chrisman vs. Hill Home Development et al
03S01-9706-CV-00077

Premium Finance Corp. vs. Crump Ins. Ser. of Memphis et al
02S01-9711-CV-00095

McCurry vs. Container Corp. of America
03S01-9705-CH-00050
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White

State vs. Looper
M1999-00662-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Robert M. Summitt

State vs. Keith Guy
02C01-9712-CC-00478
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

State vs. Audrey Downs
02C01-9710-CR-00390

State vs. Kenneth Nesbitt
02C01-9801-CC-00029

State vs. Darren Parsons
02C01-9801-CC-00030
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

State vs. Tavarus Williams
02C01-9711-CR-00423
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft

Ledford vs. Ledford
01A01-9701-CH-00029
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton

Hobbs vs. Hobbs
01A01-9801-CV-00015
Trial Court Judge: J. Curtis Smith

Coker vs. State Claims Comm
01A01-9806-BC-00318

State vs. Michell Leiderman
01C01-9703-CC-00088

State vs. Joseph Martin Thurman
01C01-9706-CC-00231

William A. Ransom vs. State
01C01-9708-CC-00328
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.

Danny Meeks vs. State
01C01-9709-CC-00387

Jerome Williams vs. State
01C01-9709-CR-00441
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.

State vs. Gary Vaughn, et al
01C01-9709-CR-00415

01C01-9802-CC-00055
01C01-9802-CC-00055
Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris

G. Winston Gragg vs. Nellie Gragg
02A01-9804-CV-00108
Trial Court Judge: Kay S. Robilio

Roger Brown vs. City of Memphis
02A01-9803-CV-00069
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

Elizabeth A. Wilson v. Worthco, Inc., et al
02S01-9712-CH-00113
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. William Michael Maloan,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found the plaintiff had suffered a compensable injury and entered a judgment in her favor of 5 percent vocational impairment to the body as a whole. The defendant raises the following issues: I. Whether the trial court erred in rejecting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on grounds that the statute of limitations had expired prior to the filing of Plaintiff's claim. II. Whether the trial court erred in finding that Plaintiff's alleged injury was compensable and not a non-compensable aggravation of a pre-existing condition. III. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the Plaintiff sustained a fifty percent (5%) permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the findings, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2); Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The application of this standard requires this Court to weigh in more depth the factual findings and conclusions of the trial court in a workers' compensation case. See Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc., 746 S.W.2d 452, 456 (Tenn. 1988).