Sandra G. Jackson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
W1999-01691-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: J. Steven Stafford, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: William Michael Maloan, Chancellor
The trial court determined that the plaintiff had suffered a 2% permanent partial disability to her right arm and a 3% permanent partial disability to her left arm as the result of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. The defendant submits that the awards are excessive and that the testimony of the independent medical evaluator should be disallowed due to his failure to utilize the AMA Guidelines in determining grip strength loss. For the following reasons, we disallow that portion of the independent medical evaluator's testimony dealing with grip strength loss but affirm the trial court's award of vocational disability.

Doretha Currie v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical
W1999-00821-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Wil V. Doran, Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris, Chancellor
The appellant presents the following issues for review: (1) Whether the trial court erred in finding that plaintiff sustained permanent partial disability as a result of a work-related injury on August 16, 1997; and (2) Whether the trial court's award of 35 percent permanent partial disability to the left arm was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. After a review of the entire record, briefs of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Mathis T. Vaughn v. State of Tennessee
M2000-00755-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer

Petitioner, Mathis T. Vaughn, filed a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, which the post-conviction court subsequently denied. Petitioner challenges the denial of his petition, raising the following issue: whether the trial court erred in dismissing his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, based upon a ruling that Petitioner’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were without merit. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the trial court's denial of the Petitioner's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.

Tyrone V. Turner v. State of Tennessee
M2000-01949-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. S. Daniel

The petitioner, Tyrone V. Turner, appeals the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief. The issue presented for review is whether the petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

Audie Lowe, et al vs. Bill Goad, et al
E2000-02056-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White
Audie Lowe, Hilda Lowe, and Sheilda Mills ("Plaintiffs") brought this boundary line suit against members of their family, Bill Goad, Mattie Goad, Eugene Olmstead, and Mae Olmstead ("Defendants"). Plaintiffs allege their predecessor-in-title, Arlie Overton, had an agreement with Defendants' predecessor-in-title, Sherman Overton, that a fence ("Fence") would serve as the boundary line. Plaintiffs' deed does not include the disputed area up to the fence. After a trial, the Trial Court dismissed Plaintiffs' complaint, holding that the Fence was not the boundary line by agreement or acquiescence. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Randall B. Coward vs. Blount County
E2000-02378-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
Randall B. Coward ("Plaintiff") was incarcerated in the Blount County jail after being charged with DUI. Plaintiff claims he was sitting on the bed in his cell when the mattress shifted causing him to fall to the floor, landing on his head. Plaintiff says there was a full size mattress on a twin size frame with the mattress extending over the frame by six to eight inches. Plaintiff sued alleging negligence and/or gross negligence on the part of Blount County ("Defendant"). Defendant filed a summary judgment motion and attached the affidavits of the Sheriff of Blount County and a deputy sheriff. Both of these individuals swear that there were two styles of mattresses in the jail, and both styles fit the bed frames. In response to the summary judgment motion, Plaintiff filed his own affidavit which stated that the mattress extended over the frame by six to eight inches and was a full size mattress on a twin size frame. The Trial Court granted Defendant's summary judgment motion. We conclude there is a genuine issue of material fact, and, therefore, vacate the judgment.

Allied Sound, Inc. vs Eddie Neely & Johnny Davis
E2000-01095-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
In this action alleging misrepresentation, concealment and fraud, the Trial Court granted defendants summary judgment on the grounds that it was unreasonable for plaintiff to rely on any representations made by defendants. On appeal, we affirm.

E2000-01095-R3-CV
E2000-01095-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone

Dexter L. Williams vs. State
E1999-00871-SC-R11-PC
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young

Dexter L. Williams vs. State
E1999-00871-SC-R11-PC
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Blanche Bunch vs. Robert Sharp
E1999-02524-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.
In this boundary line dispute, the Trial Judge established the boundary between the parties' lands and Plaintiff has appealed. We affirm.

Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
E1999-01859-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.

Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
E1999-01859-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.

Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
E1999-01859-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.

Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
E1999-01859-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.

Loreta MCCollum, et al vs. James Connatser
E2000-02561-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
On May 9, 1997, Alleen C. McCroskey ("the decedent") passed away, leaving two children, Loretta C. McCollum and James W. Connatser, Jr. McCollum, individually and as administratrix of the decedent's estate, filed suit against her brother, claiming that Connatser, as a result of undue influence on the decedent and/or conversion, wrongfully obtained monies that now rightfully belong to the decedent's estate. The trial court granted Connatser summary judgment, and McCollum appealed. We vacate the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Steven Hull vs. Susan Hull and Garth Eddy
E2000-02696-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
In this action to recover proceeds on life insurance policies required by a divorce decree for the children, the Trial Judge held the children were entitled to the proceeds, rather than the beneficiary named in the policies. We affirm.

James Crawford vs. Ray Thomason, et al
M1998-00926-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III
This appeal stems from a hostile work environment claim involving the Department of Streets and Signs of the City of Murfreesboro. After enduring approximately three years of racial harassment by his immediate supervisors, an employee of the Department of Streets and Signs filed suit in the Chancery Court for Rutherford County against the City of Murfreesboro, the city manager, and his two supervisors seeking damages and injunctive relief under the Tennessee Human Rights Act. The City moved for summary judgment, pointing out that the offending supervisors had been terminated less than one month after the employee brought their conduct to the attention of the public works director. The trial court granted the summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. The employee has appealed. After reviewing the record in light of the principles announced in Parker v. Warren County Util. Dist., 2 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. 1999), we have determined that the City is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment.

Doris Tipton vs. Elizabeth Quinn
M1998-00951-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray
This is a breach of contract case involving agreements for Defendant to board and breed Plaintiff's horses for a share of the resulting foals. Shortly after the parties entered into an oral agreement, Defendant memorialized the agreement in a handwritten note. The agreement was subsequently reduced to more detailed writings by Plaintiff, which both parties signed. Plaintiff later claimed that Defendant breached portions of the agreement which required her to timely breed the mares, provide insurance, adequately care for and maintain the horses, provide adequate veterinary care for the horses, allow inspection of the horses, and halter-break foals. Defendant claimed that the agreement prepared by Plaintiff did not reflect the parties' original oral contract. The trial court granted Plaintiff partial summary judgment on the portion of her breach of contract claim alleging that Defendant failed to obtain insurance. After a bench trial, the court awarded Plaintiff compensatory damages for breach of contract as well as attorney's fees. Defendant appeals those decisions. We affirm as modified.

Michael Dawn Frisbey v. Dorothy Marie Frisbey
M1999-00717-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Keith Pfister vs. Tammy Searle (Moretti)
M2000-01921-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Lonnie R. Hoover
The appellant appeals from the trial court's judgment finding her in criminal and civil contempt for violation of an order establishing visitation for the father of her child. Because the appellant was not provided the notice required for criminal contempt, we vacate that holding; because the appellant complied with the court's order to produce her child, thereby purging her civil contempt, that judgment is now moot, and we decline to address it.

State of Tennessee v. Timothy McKinney
W1999-00844-CCA-R3-DD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph B. Dailey

We affirm the defendant’s convictions of first degree murder and attempted second degree murder and the death sentence imposed on the murder charge, despite the defendant’s claims that: (1) the trial court erroneously disallowed expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identification; (2) the jury’s capital sentencing verdict was infirm; (3) the trial court erroneously allowed the impeachment of a defense character witness during the penalty phase of the trial; (4) the trial court erred in allowing victim impact evidence that related to the impact of the victim’s death on persons or institutions other than the victim’s family; (5) the trial court erroneously limited the defendant’s argument to the jury during the penalty phase; (6) cumulative errors require reversal of the death sentence; (7) the Tennessee death penalty statute is, for various reasons, unconstitutional. We find no error and hold that the death penalty in this case was proportionate to the death penalty imposed in similar cases, the sentence was not arbitrarily imposed, and the evidence supports the jury’s finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance and its finding that the aggravating circumstance outweighs any mitigating circumstances. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-206(c)(1) (1997).

State of Tennessee v. Donald Johnson, Jr.
W2000-00875-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bernie Weinman

Defendant was convicted by a Shelby County jury of felony murder and received a life sentence. In this appeal, defendant alleges: (1) the trial court erred in failing to suppress both his oral and written statements given to authorities; and (2) the state improperly exercised its peremptory challenges based upon race and gender. Upon our review, we are unable to resolve the suppression issue due to inadequate findings of fact and, therefore, remand for further findings regarding the oral and written statements. We conclude the trial court correctly ruled that there were legitimate race and gender-neutral reasons for the peremptory challenges. The judgment of the trial court is vacated, and the case is remanded for further findings and/or proceedings.

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Trial Court Judge: Dale C. Workman