Wood vs. Prosser, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Aghili vs. Saadatnejadi
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
03S01-9607-CV-00082
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Jimmy Robinson
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Johnson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Johnny Perry
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9603-CC-00099
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CC-00066
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Glenda Whisenhunt vs. Gordon Whisenhunt
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
David Dunnehew vs. Donna Dunnehew
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State vs. James Harvest
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Harvest
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Freddie Mans
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Barry Wells vs. Ron Rickard
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Pacific Properties, v. Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, v. Michael S. Stalcup
This action for conversion was submitted to a jury which returned a general verdict for the plaintiff, thereby implicitly finding that the fact-driven principal defense of the Statute of Limitations was not well-taken. Home Federal appeals and presents for review issues which, as paraphrased, question the propriety of the submission of the case to the jury, whether the defense of Statute of Limitations was well-taken, as a matter of law, whether requested jury instructions should have been given and whether the drawer of a check adequately instructed the drawee Bank as to its disposition. Pacific Properties |
Court of Appeals | ||
Barry Wells vs. Ron Rickard
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. David Paul Martin
We granted review in this case to determine whether a court-ordered mental evaluation violated the defendant’s right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel under the United States and Tennessee Constitutions. |
Supreme Court | ||
Thelma W. Kelley, v. John E. Vance and Betty L. Vance, and Allstate Insurance Company
In this action, plaintiff seeks uninsured motorist coverage from her insurance company, and the Trial Court, responding to motion for summary judgment, granted judgment to defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Plaintiff has appealed.
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Aeyon Cho v. Dae-Young Jeong - Concurring
We granted the application of Dae-Young Jeong (Husband) for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 9, T.R.A.P., to consider whether the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction to grant his wife, the plaintiff Aeyon Cho (Wife), an absolute divorce. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Whitney Leigh Davidson, Minor Child, by next friend, Rozan Davidson, v. Donna Wright, et al.
The Knox County Board of Education adopted a policy against the possession of weapons on school campuses for the school year beginning in September 1995. Whitney Leigh Davidson was provided a copy of the West High School Handbook which explained the policy and the consequences of its violation. On January 23, 1996, while a junior at West High School, she was suspended for a violation of the policy. Following a series of administrative hearings the Board of Education held a plenary hearing and upheld the decision to expel Ms Davidson for one year. Judicial review resulted in a finding that the Board had not acted arbitrarily, illegally or beyond its jurisdiction in expelling Ms. Davidson. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Michael Robey
The appellant, Michael Wayne Robey, was indicted on two counts of aggravated burglary and two counts of theft. As part of a plea agreement, the two theft charges were dismissed; and he pled guilty to two counts of aggravated burglary. The appellant was classified as a Range II, multiple offender and the state recommended concurrent sentences of seven years at 35%. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Eldred Reid
The Appellant, Eldreid Reid, appeals as of right his conviction and sentence for one count of rape. He argues on appeal: (1) The trial court erred when it permitted the State to introduce evidence that Dorey Horton’s daughter had charged her with assault.
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals |