Billy Aldridge vs. State
01C01-9704-CR-00142

Mildred Daniel vs. James Daniel
02A01-9606-CH-00135
Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.

State vs. Kenneth Johnson
02C01-9612-CR-00476
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

State vs. Kevin Hyman & Karen Russell
02C01-9612-CR-00454

State vs. Raymond Jones
02C01-9705-CC-00162

State vs. Steven Culps
02C01-9705-CC-00163

State vs. Rickey Nelson
02C01-9607-CR-00223
Trial Court Judge: John P. Colton, Jr.

Robert Martin vs. Union Planters
02A01-9708-CV-00179
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

State vs. James Jones
01C01-9612-CC-00522
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.

State vs. Larry Holbrooks
01C01-9701-CR-00011

State vs. Timothy Brown
01C01-9701-CR-00032
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.

State vs. Christopher Parker
01C01-9701-CR-00037

McGlothlin vs. Bristol
03A01-9706-CV-00236

State vs. Judy Leath
01C01-9511-CC-00393

State vs. Harry Reed
01C01-9701-CC-00007

State vs. Mark Rawlings
02C01-9612-CR-00475
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Mccartie

State vs. Darwin Windham
02C01-9705-CC-00196

State vs. Gaylen Rhodes
02C01-9703-CC-00121
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Knoll vs. Knoll
03A01-9707-CH-00275

Stephens vs. Revco
03A01-9708-CV-00351

Worley vs. State
03A01-9708-JV-00366

Cheri Owens Tuncay v. Engin Halif Tuncay - Concurring
02A01-9709-CH-00209
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor D. J. Alissandratos

This is a divorce case. Plaintiff-appellant Cheri Owens Tuncay was granted a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. Mrs. Tuncay appeals the trial court’s division of the marital debts as well as the court’s failure to award her alimony beyond $5,000 in attorney fees.

Larry Stephen Roseberry, v. Janis Roseberry
03A01-9706-CH-00237
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Trial Court Judge: Judge Earle G. Murphy

In this divorce action, the appellant (husband) appeals from the judgment of the trial court questioning the amount of child support he was ordered to pay, the division of marital property and alimony, including the amount, nature, and duration. The appellee (wife) seeks attorney fees for this appeal. No issue is presented relating to the granting of the divorce. We note that at the time of the trial, the husbanc had more than enough life insurance in force to satisfy this requirement.

Donald Neil Pierce, v. Branda Ann Radford Pierce
03A01-9707-GS-00250
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas A. Austin

This is a divorce case.  On appeal, Brenda Pierce (wife) raises the issues of whether the tril court erred by refusing to grant her periodic alimony, by failing to grant her the divorce, and by failing to grant her discretionary costs and attorney's fees. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.

Gina Franklin et al., v. Allied Signal, Inc.
02A01-9704-CV-00088
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Judge Whit A. Lafon

This appeal involves a suit filed by plaintiffs, Gina (“Mrs. Franklin”) and Barnee Franklin (“the Franklins”), against defendant, Allied Signal, Inc. (“Allied”), for personal injuries sustained when Mrs. Franklin tripped and fell on Allied’s premises on a metal loading ramp which protruded above the dock floor by one to two inches. The trial court granted Allied’s motion for summary judgment. The Franklins appeal and pose the following issues for our consideration: (1) whether the trial court committed error in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment; and (2) whether the “open and obvious rule” bars plaintiff’s recovery or is only a factor to be considered in assessing comparative negligence. For reasons stated hereafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand.