State vs. Wayne Joseph Burgess, Jr.
M1999-02040-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton
The appellant, Wayne Joseph Burgess, Jr., was convicted by a jury in the Giles County Circuit Court of one count of first degree felony murder, with the underlying felony being aggravated child abuse. The trial court sentenced the appellant to life in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The appellant raises the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in overruling the appellant's motion to strike the jury panel because the appellant's race was substantially under- represented on the venire from which the petit jury was selected under a practice providing "the opportunity for discrimination;" (2) whether the trial court erred in overruling the appellant's motion to suppress a confession that was obtained by the use of intimidation, threat, and coercion by the Pulaski Police Department; (3) whether the trial court erred in overruling the appellant's objection to allowing the prior inconsistent statement of Rickey Sikes to be entered into the record as substantive evidence; (4) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the appellant's conviction of first degree murder in the perpetration of aggravated child abuse as the State failed to prove the requisite mental status of "knowing" to commit that offense. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Kelly vs. So. Central Corr. Facility Disciplinary Bd.
M1999-02083-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Jones
Petitioner, Henderson Kelly, appeals the action of the trial court in granting a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) motion to dismiss his petition for a writ of certiorari requesting review of an agency decision. We affirm the action of the trial judge.

State vs. Michael N. Grey
M1999-01428-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace
The appellant, Michael N. Grey, was convicted by a jury in the Dickson County Circuit Court of two counts of aggravated robbery, a class B felony, and two counts of theft under $500, a class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced the appellant to ten years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for the aggravated robbery convictions. The trial court also sentenced the appellant to eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration in the Dickson County Jail for the theft convictions.The trial court further ordered that the appellant's sentences be served concurrently. The appellant raises the following issue for review: whether the appellant was denied due process because the State failed to provide him with proper pre-trial exculpatory evidence. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgments of the trial court.

State vs. Barry Waters Rogers
M1999-01389-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Jones
The appellant, Barry Waters Rogers, appeals his conviction by a jury in the Giles County Circuit Court of driving under the influence of an intoxicant. On appeal, the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the underlying indictment. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Travis Plummer vs. State
M1999-01406-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman
The petitioner, Travis Plummer, was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court of Davidson County of one count of rape of a child, and subsequently also pled guilty to one count of rape. The trial court sentenced the petitioner to twenty years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for rape of a child and to twelve years incarceration for rape. The trial court further ordered that the petitioner's sentences be served consecutively. In this post conviction proceeding, the petitioner raises the following issue(s) for review: whether the petitioner was denied his constitutional rights at trial and at the plea proceeding when his counsel(s) failed to investigate and evaluate his competency to stand trial and to plead guilty. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

Donna Martin vs. Mary Coleman, et al
M1999-02238-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace
This is a dispute over real property which was the subject of an installment land sales contract between the parties and over the proceeds of an insurance policy after the dwelling on the property burned. The trial court ordered that the title to the property be divested from the Seller and be vested in the Buyer and that the remaining proceeds of the insurance policy be awarded to Buyer after all overdue payments of taxes and insurance and the incurred clean up costs were deducted. The Seller appeals on the grounds that the evidence was contrary to the judgment and that the plaintiff had breached the contract and is entitled to neither the property nor the insurance proceeds. For the reasons below, we affirm the judgment as modified.

State of Tennessee v. Arnold L. Jones
II-1-98-353
Trial Court Judge: Timothy L. Easter

State of Tennessee v. James E. Mathis
II-1098-328-C
Trial Court Judge: Timothy L. Easter

Frazier vs. Whisman
M1997-00225-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy
This appeal arises from the efforts of an inmate of the Tennessee Department of Correction to have his sentence recalculated. The prisoner initially wrote to an employee of the department requesting the recalculation. Ten months after receiving the department's letter denying his request, the prisoner filed a petition for a declaratory judgment in the Chancery Court for Davidson County. The trial court dismissed the petition, and the prisoner appeals. We affirm the trial court because the prisoner did not file his petition within sixty days of the department's decision.

Beech vs. Hibbett
M1997-00239-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy
This appeal involves a dispute over the proceeds from the Department of Transportation's condemnation of a portion of a tract of real property on Harding Road in Davidson County. When the condemnation took place, a life tenant was occupying the property with a vested remainder interest being held by the life tenant's stepdaughter. Following a disagreement over who should receive the condemnation proceeds, the life tenant's stepdaughter filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County. After the State paid the proceeds into court, the trial court awarded the proceeds to the stepdaughter on the condition that she invest them and share the investment income equally with her stepmother for the duration of the life tenancy. The life tenant has appealed. We have determined that the trial court erred by awarding the condemnation proceeds to the life tenant's stepdaughter and, therefore, reverse the judgment.

State vs. Barry Speck
W1999-00436-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: John P. Colton, Jr.
The petitioner, Barry L. Speck, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The state contends that the petition should have been dismissed because of the statute of limitations. The petitioner contends that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to use documents provided by the petitioner to impeach the state's witnesses and to provide an alibi for dates listed in the bill of particulars. We hold that the petition was properly considered on its merits, but we affirm the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief.

Michael Youmans vs. Samuel Coleman
W2000-00150-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn
This is a construction case. The general contractor sued the homeowner for failing to make payment under the contract and for failing to pay for "extras" not contained in the original contract. The homeowner asserted that the general contractor failed to make certain corrections to the home, and that he did not agree to pay for "extras." After a bench trial, the trial court held for the homeowner. The general contractor appeals. We affirm, finding that the trial court's decision was based on its determination of the credibility of the witnesses.

The Bogatin Law Firm vs. Hallum Motors
W2000-00409-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.
Appellee, an Arkansas corporation, and Appellant, a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in Arkansas and Tennessee, entered into an asset sales agreement for the sale and purchase of assets relating to an automobile dealership in West Memphis, Arkansas. Earnest money was placed in escrow with the Bogatin Law Firm, PLC in Memphis, Tennessee. Dispute concerning the asset sales agreement arose, and both parties made claim to the earnest money. The Bogatin Law Firm filed a complaint for interpleader in Shelby County, Tennessee. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss based upon improper venue which the trial court granted. We reverse, finding that venue in Shelby County was proper and that Appellee submitted to jurisdiction in Shelby County, Tennessee.

State vs. Jere Joseph
W1999-00651-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: J. Steven Stafford
The petitioner, Jere Lowell Joseph, Jr., appeals two post-conviction cases, claiming that the trial court erred in holding that the petitioner received the effective assistance of counsel in both cases. We affirm the trial court.

Watauga Industries, Inc. vs. Harry W. Greenwell, et al
E1999-00699-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson

Watauga Industries, Inc. vs. Harry W. Greenwell, et al
E1999-00699-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson

First Utility District of Knox County vs. Eleanor Jo Jarnigan-Bodden
E1999-01674-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Harold Wimberly
The property owner objected to service of process and asserted due process violations relating to a utility district easement condemnation. Service of process by publication was proper notice to the non-resident Cayman Islands resident, there was no showing that the condemnation for public purpose was not necessary, and there was no right for the property owner to demand a jury of view to determine the proper easement for a water line. Judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the case remanded for determination of the compensation due the property owner for the taking.

First Utility District of Knox County, Tennessee v. Eleanor Jo Jarnigan-Bodden
E1999-01674-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Judge Harold Wimberly, Jr.

The property owner objected to service of process and asserted due process violations relating to a utility district easement condemnation. Service of process by publication was proper notice to the non-resident Cayman Islands resident, there was no showing that the condemnation for public purpose was not necessary, and there was no right for the property owner to demand a jury of view to determine the proper easement for a water line. Judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the case remanded for determination of the compensation due the property owner for the taking.

Ann Phillips v. Marvin Windows
W1999-02243-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: William Michael Maloan, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The defendant, Marvin Windows (Marvin), appeals the judgment of the Lauderdale Chancery Court awarding the plaintiff, Ann Phillips (Phillips), permanent partial disability of seventeen percent (17%) to the body as a whole.

Henry Eugene Hodges vs. State
M1999-00516-CCA-R3-PD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
The appellant, Henry Eugene Hodges, seeks post-conviction relief from his 1992 first degree murder conviction and sentence of death. The Davidson County Criminal Court denied the appellant's petition and this appeal was taken. This court is presented with the following issues: (1) the effectiveness of trial counsel; (2) the post-conviction court's failure to provide funds for expert services; and (3) the post-conviction court's denial of a continuance and refusal to bifurcate the post-conviction evidentiary hearing. Following review of the record, we conclude (1) the appellant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel; (2) the post-conviction court properly denied the appellant's request for funds for additional expert services; and (3) the post-conviction court properly denied the appellant's request for a continuance of the evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we affirm the post-conviction court's finding that the appellant is not entitled to post-conviction relief.

State vs. Marcus Morrow
M1999-00769-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton
The appellant, the State of Tennessee, appeals the order of the Maury County Circuit Court permitting the appellee, Marcus Morrow, to participate in a work release program during his forty-five-day incarceration for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), second offense. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

William Andrew Dixon vs. Flora J. Holland, Warden
M1999-02494-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman
William Andrew Dixon was convicted of kidnapping for ransom in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-2603 in April 1981 in the Circuit Court of Dickson County. The offense was committed in April 1978. Between the time of the offense in 1978, and the time of trial in 1981, kidnapping for ransom was redesignated by the legislature as the offense of aggravated kidnapping; the maximum punishment was reduced by the legislature from life imprisonment without parole to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. The Tennessee Department of Correction maintains that it is incarcerating Petitioner under a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Criminal Court of Davidson County, asserting the judgment is illegal and void. The petition was denied. The judgment is affirmed.

State vs. Reginald Tyrone Donnell
M1999-02184-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond
Defendant, Reginald Tyrone Donnell, was indicted on two counts of first degree murder. A Wilson County jury found him guilty of two counts of second degree murder. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant to twenty-five (25) years in the Department of Correction for each count, with the sentences to run consecutively. The Defendant now appeals contending: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support convictions of second degree murder, 2) the trial court failed to exclude autopsy photographs of the victims, 3) the sentences imposed by the trial court were excessive, and 4) the trial court erred in ordering consecutive sentences. After review of the record, we affirm.

Karen Garrett Humphries v. David Alison Humphries
E1999-02694-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: Jean A. Stanley

Ronald Bradford Waller vs. State
E1999-02034-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer
The petitioner was convicted in the Hamilton County Criminal Court in 1992 of first degree murder, especially aggravated robbery, and theft over $1,000, receiving an effective sentence of life plus twenty-three years. The convictions and sentences were affirmed on direct appeal in 1993; and the petitioner subsequently filed a petition for post-conviction relief, presenting as issues, whether there was a variance between the indictment and the proof, whether he was improperly compelled to participate in a courtroom demonstration, whether he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal, whether his convictions constitute double jeopardy, whether the trial court erred in evidentiary rulings, whether he was improperly convicted because of prosecutorial misconduct or cumulative errors at the trial, and whether his convictions amount to a miscarriage of justice. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the petition for post-conviction relief.