03A01-9507-GS-00217
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Duncan v. Crawford, Maryville, For The Appellant.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
The Metropolitan Gov. of Nashville and Davidison County, Tennessee and The Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority v. Overnite Transportation Company - Concurring
This is an appeal by the petitioners/appellants, Tennessee State Department of Transportation ("TDOT") and Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority ("MNAA"), from a jury verdict and judgment valuing four acres of condemned property owned by the respondent/appellee, Overnite Transportation Company ("Overnite"), at $1,759,578.10. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Forrest City Grocery Company, v. Tennessee Department of Revenue
The plaintiff, Forrest City Grocery Company, filed a declaratory judgment action in the Chancery Court of Davidson County alleging that the Unfair Cigarette Sales Law violates (1) the Sherman Antitrust Act, and (2) the plaintiff's right to due process. The chancellor found the issues in favor of the statute and dismissed the complaint. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation, v. Reuben Bonilla and Marco Bonilla, Partners, D/B/A Car Stereo Shop and Mobile Phone
One of the captioned defendants, Reuben Bonilla, has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court overruling his motion to set aside a default judgment in favor of the captioned plaintiff. The notice of appeal states: Notice is hereby given that Reuben Bonilla, defendant named herein, hereby appeals to the Court of Appeals from the order entered in this cause on the 21st day of November, 1994. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, ex rel., Claudia Agee, v. J.C. Chapman, Jr.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the lower court finding the respondent in contempt for failing to pay child support. The lower court sentenced the respondent to six months in jail but allowed him to remain free if he complied with the court's current support order and remained within the state. On appeal, the respondent argues that he had no notice of the original support order, that he was not given proper notice of the contempt charges, that the trial judge improperly denied his request for a jury, and that the trial judge erred in denying him the right to leave the state. In accordance with the following opinion we reverse the lower court's sentence for contempt and its injunction against leaving the state. Otherwise, we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9507-CH-00212
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9505-CV-00153
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9407-CV-00161
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9407-CV-00169
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9404-CV-00077
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9410-CH-00235
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Bessie Lee King v. Davidson (NMN) Taylor - Concurring
This appeal arises out of a paternity action filed by the Plaintiff-Appellee, Bessie Lee King, against the Defendant-Appellant, Davidson Taylor, to establish the paternity of King's minor child, Davene. The action was originally filed in the Juvenile Court of Memphis and Shelby County, but was transferred to Circuit Court after Mr. Taylor requested a jury trial. Mr. Taylor, Ms. King, and Davene submitted to a blood test. The sworn blood test results, which accompanied Appellee's motion for summary judgment, established that Mr. Taylor had a 99.65% probability of being Davene's father. Relying on both the blood test and T.C.A. § 24-7-112(b)(2) (Michie 1994), the trial court granted Ms. King's motion for summary judgment. Mr. Taylor appeals the decision of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Paula Van Slyke (Fleming) v. Philp Edward Fleming - Concurring
This case involves the question of whether a custodial parent may claim the benefit of changes in the child support guidelines promulgated after trial on her Petition for Increased Child Support, but before the trial court filed its Final Order. Because those changes were not raised in the proceedings below, we decline to act on them here. Instead, we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Laura Patricia Cutsinger v. Charles Edward Cutsinger - Concurring
In this divorce case, Charles Edward Cutsinger (Husband) has appealed the trial court's judgment which awarded Laura Patricia Cutsinger (Wife) a thirty percent (30%) interest as a seller in the contract of sale of Husband's chiropractic practice. Husband also has appealed the trial court's ruling which ordered Husband to indemnify Wife for any judgment that might arise as a result of an indebtedness for a pleasure boat purchased during the marriage. |
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9409-CV-00174
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9409-CV-00201
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CV-00260
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
James R. Fruge and Jane Fruge v. John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendants-Appellees.This appeal involves a suit seeking recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of a liability insurance policy. Plaintiffs, James R. Fruge and Jane Fruge, appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to the unnamed defendant-appellee, State Farm Insurance Company. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Jerry Don Lumpkins, v. Belinda Baines Lumpkins
This appeal involves a dispute over child support for two pre-teen boys. Two years after their divorce in the Chancery Court for Sumner County, the parents returned to court seeking resolution of their disputes concerning the custody and visitation arrangements and the amount of child support. A special judge awarded the mother sole custody of the children, modified the father’s visitation schedule, and directed the father to pay child support in accordance with the child support guidelines. The father takes issue on this appeal with the amount of his child support. We have determined that the amount of the father’s child support should be modified to take all his income into consideration. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Sherri Mangrum v. Frank Dean Owens
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether defendant, Frank Dean Owens, is entitled to share with plaintiff, Sherri Mangrum, the proceeds of a settlement for the wrongful death of their minor daughter, Lisa Michelle Owens. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Sheryl Lynny Hooke (Thompson) v. Alan Richard Thompson
This matter concerns the custody of Wayne Nicholas Thompson, II, the minor son of Appellee, Sheryl Lynne Hooke (Thompson) ("Mother") and Appellant, Alan Richard Thompson ("Father"). Both parties sought custody pursuant to separate petitions for divorce.1 The final divorce decree awarded custody to Mother, but stated that Father was to have physical possession of the child during the time period in which Mother underwent treatment for alcoholism. The decree provided that upon Mother's completion of a treatment program, physical possession of Nicholas would revert immediately to her. Father has appealed from the trial court's judgment, challenging both the custody award and the trial court's denial of his request to discover Mother's psychiatric records. For reasons hereinafter expressed, we affirm the judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mid-State Advertising D/B/A The Nashville Scene, v. Douglas Sarmento
This appeal involves a suit on a guaranty agreement. Defendant, Douglas Sarmento, appeals from the trial court's order granting plaintiff, Mid-State Advertising, d/b/a "The Nashville Scene," summary judgment. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |
