X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Unicoi | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9503-CH-00110
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9506-CH-00201
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Jimmy France, v. Christine Bradley, Commissioner of Department of Correction, Ned Ray McWherter, Governor of State of Tennessee, et al.
The captioned plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court dismissing his suit against the captioned defendants for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief regarding the constitutionality of application of certain statutes to plaintiff and certain actions, practices and policies of the defendants. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lessie Blankenship, v. Century Health Services, Inc.
Lessie Blankenship ("plaintiff") filed suit in the Circuit Court of Bedford County against Century Health Services, Inc. ("Century" or "defendant"), seeking damages for breach of a commercial lease. Following a bench trial, the court awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $44,943.80 for rent due under the lease, costs incurred by plaintiff in seeking to relet the premises, and attorney fees in the amount of 15% of the amount of the judgment. On appeal, Century presents five issues for review: Whether the trial court erred (1) in finding that Century had assumed the lease between plaintiff and South Central Home Health, Inc. (?South Central”), the original lessee; (2) in concluding that Century had not properly terminated the lease; (3) in finding that plaintiff had properly mitigated her damages; (4) in awarding plaintiff damages for future rent under the lease; and (5) in awarding plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of 15% of plaintiff's judgment. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Shasta Mead Morey, v. Leslie Charles Morey
The defendant, Leslie Charles Morey, has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court awarding to the plaintiff, Shasta Mead Morey, an absolute divorce, custody of a minor child, child support, a share of marital property, and $3,000.00 attorneys' fees. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Shelter Insurance Companies, v. Sherrie Marie Hann
The defendant, Sherrie Marie Hann, has appealed from a non-jury judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Shelter Insurance Companies for $5,000 paid to defendant by mistake. As indicated in the caption, this was a proceeding in Chancery Court. |
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Rebecca Diane Turner (Turpin) v. Charles Daniel Turner -Concurring
This appeal involves an acrimonious post-divorce dispute over child support and visitation. After their divorce in 1990, the mother filed several petitions in the Circuit Court for Warren County seeking to hold the father in contempt. The father also filed several petitions to modify his child support because of his inability to pay. This appeal involves the denial of the father’s latest petition for modification and the summary suspension of his visitation for not paying child support. We have determined that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s conclusion that the circumstances with regard to the father’s income have not changed and that the father’s visitation should be suspended. Accordingly, we vacate the order dismissing the father’s petition and remand the case for further proceedings. |
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9408-Ch-00199
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9409-CV-00222
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9409-BC-00210
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Shoney's, Inc. and Shoney's of Canada, Inc., v. Chic Can Enterprises, LTD., an Alberta Corporation, Chic Can Enterprises, an Alberta LTD Ptrshp, et al.
The plaintiffs, Shoney's Inc., and Shoney's of Canada, Inc., have appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court dismissing their suit against the defendants, Chic Can Enterprises, Ltd., Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta, Inc., and Gen Group, Incorporated for lack of personal jurisdiction of said defendants. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Chrystyna Anisia (Czyz) Reymann, v. Vincent Robert Reymann
This is an appeal from a decree of divorce in which the issues presented on appeal by defendant-appellant are: |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Benny E. Shope and wife, Betty S. Shope, v. Radio Shack, a division of Tandy Corporation, and Radio Shack, Inc., a corporation doing business in Bradley County, Tennessee
This is a premises liability action. The case was tried before a jury to the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof, the defendants moved for a directed verdict which was granted. Judgment ws entered in favor of the defendants. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Benny R. Shope and wife, Betty S. Shope, v. Radio Shack, a division of Tandy Corporation, and Radio Shack, Inc. a corporation doing business in Bradley County, Tennessee
This is a premises liability action. The case was tried before a jury to the conclusion of the plaintiffs' proof. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs' proof, the defendants moved for a directed verdict which was granted. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ardis Mobile Home Park, v. State of Tennessee
This is an appeal from a decision of the Tennessee Claims Commission wherein the commissioner determined that the occurrences at issue constituted a taking of property by the State of Tennessee rather than a nuisance. The commissioner concluded that the exclusive remedy for a taking is an inverse condemnation action pursuant to T.C. A. § 29-16-123. Since actions predicated on inverse condemnation are outside the scope of the jurisdiction of the Claims Commission, the commissioner dismissed the claim. This appeal resulted. We reverse the judgment of the commissioner. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Frances Gregg Brickell and Edwina Ellis Coffey v. City of Friendsville
This is an extraordinary appeal in the most literal sense of the word. The appellant prevailed in the trial court, but nevertheless, as appealed claiming that the trial court erred in refusing to consolidate this action with another action relating to the same subject matter pending in the same court. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Calvin Edward Gallaher v. Dee ann Gallaher
Dee Ann Curtis Gallaher appeals that portion of a divorce decree entered by the Chancery Court for Meigs County which granted her husband, Calvin Edward Gallaher, custody of their four-year old daughter.
|
Meigs | Court of Appeals |
