State of Tennessee, v. Daniel G. Hampton
The appellant, Daniel G. Hampton, was convicted of driving under the influence, second offense, a Class A misdemeanor, two counts of driving on a revoked license, Class B misdemeanors, and violation of the implied consent law by a jury of his peers. The trial court sentenced the appellant to eleven months and twenty-nine days in the Carter County Jail with all but seventy days suspended for the driving under the influence, second offense; six months suspended in the Carter County Jail for driving on a revoked license on April 9, 1994 which was ordered to run concurrently with the other sentences; and six months in the Carter County Jail with all but twenty days suspended for driving on a revoked license on April 1, 1994 which was ordered to run consecutively to the driving under the influence, second offense conviction. |
Carter | Court of Appeals | |
Patricia Gobel v. Estate of Rupert Newman, Deceased
The Probate Court of Putnam County dismissed a claim against the estate of Rupert O. Newman because the claimant lacked standing to make the claim. We affirm. |
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Comprehensive Engineering Assistance Association, Inc., v. State of Tennessee, Department of Labor and Al Bodie, Commissioner of the Department of Labor, in his official capacity
The captioned plaintiff has appealed from an order of the Trial Court reading as follows: This matter came to be heard on June 2, 1995, upon the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of the defendants, Tennessee Department of Labor and Al Bodie, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor. Upon consideration of the pleadings filed and the argument of counsel, the Court finds that this matter should be dismissed on the basis that the Court lacks jurisdiction as the petition for judicial review was not filed within sixty days of the final agency action as required by T.C.A. §4-5-322. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Costs shall be taxed to the petitioner. On appeal, plaintiff presents a single issue as follows: Did the Chancery Court err in dismissing this matter for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that the complaint was not timely filed? |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
James R. Tully, Jr., v. USA Wireless, Inc., PMT Investments, Inc., and Patrick M. Thompson, in both his individual and corporate capacity
The issues in this appeal are (1) whether the chancellor erred in granting a judgment against a corporation for back wages, (2) whether the chancellor should have pierced the corporate veil and granted a judgment against the corporation’s principal shareholder and (3) whether the court erred in dismissing the fraud claims against the principal shareholder. We affirm the chancellor’s decision in part and reverse on the fraud claims made directly against the principal shareholder. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Evelyn June Thomason, v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davison County
The plaintiff, Evelyn June Thomason, has appealed from a summary judgment |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ernest White Patton, III, v. Linda Harvey Patton
In this divorce action, the husband appeals from the Trial Court's determination of the classificatin of property as marital property and the division of the marital estate. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Robert Dale Cobb, v. Douglas R. Beier
The determinative issue on appeal is whether the appeals should be dismissed because the appellant did not file notice of the appeal with the clerk of the appellant court designated in the notice of appeal. |
Hamblen | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Dale Cobb v. Douglas R. Beier - Concurring
The determinative issue on appeal is whether the appeal should be dismissed because the appellant did not file notice of the appeal with the clerk of the appellate court designated in the notice of appeal. |
Hamblen | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Dale Cobb, v. Douglas R. Beier - Dissenting
While I concede tha the majority opinion is technically correct and the reasoning employed comports with previous case law, I observe that this Court, or at least this member of this Court, has routinely overruled such motions when the only defect as to the serviceof thenotice of appeal is failure to file a copy with the Clerk of this Court.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
In Re the Estate of Howard D. Smith, Deceased, Shaun Murray, v. Jennie C. Smith, Individually and as Conservator for Howard D. Smith and Western Surety Co., Manufacturer
This case involves an alleged breach of fiduciary duty by the conservator of an estate. After a bench trial, the trial court held that the plaintiff had failed to prove a breach of fiduciary duty. We find that the trial court misapplied the burden of proof and reverse the trial court’s decision. |
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
02C01-9508-CC-00210
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9508-CC-00210
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9408-CR-00165
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9408-CR-00165
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9402-CR-00023
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9511-CR-00338
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9511-CR-00338
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9511-CR-00338
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00134
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00134
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9510-CC-00299
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9509-CR-00254
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9509-CR-00254
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9502-CC-00032
|
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9502-CC-00032
|
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals |