Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

01C01-9806-CR-00265 01C01-9806-CR-00265 Trial Court Judge: Jane W. Wheatcraft	Sumner	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/30/99
State vs. Jackie Dean Mayes, Jr. 01C01-9812-CC-00494	Williamson	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/30/99
Charles Gaylor vs. State 03C01-9702-CR-00066 Trial Court Judge: James W Itt	Campbell	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/30/99
Virginia Byrd v. Cookeville General Hospital 01S01-9805-CV-00097 Authoring Judge: Per Curiam Trial Court Judge: Hon. John Turnbull, Judge This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employer, Cookeville General Hospital, insists (1) the trial judge erred in awarding permanent disability benefits for the employee's right leg injury and (2) the award of seventy percent permanent partial disability to the left foot is excessive. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. Because the extent of an injured worker's permanent vocational	Putnam	Workers Compensation Panel	09/29/99
Eldridge vs. Eldridge 01A01-9808-CV-00451	Sumner	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Lattimer vs. TDOC 01A01-9804-CH-00200 Trial Court Judge: Carol McCoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Wagner vs. Gaston 01A01-9804-CV-00215 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Sequatchie	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
In re: The Adoption of female child, E.N.R. 01A01-9806-CH-00316 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Lawrence	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Hulshof vs. Hulshof 01A01-9806-CH-00339 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Marshall	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Sherlock vs. Kwik Sak, et al 01A01-9807-CV-00346 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Rutherford	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Nickelson vs. Sumner Co. Bd. of Ed. 01A01-9807-CV-00375 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Sumner	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Davis vs. Computer Maintenance Svc. 01A01-9809-CV-00459 Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Eldridge vs. Eldridge 01A01-9808-CV-00451 Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall	Sumner	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Haywood vs. Haywood 01A01-9808-CH-00442 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Maury	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Jo Ann Forman, Inc. et al vs. Nat'l Council on Compensation 01A01-9805-CH-00260 Trial Court Judge: Thomas A. Greer, Jr.	Marion	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Opryland Hotel vs. Millbrook Distribution Svcs. 01A01-9810-CH-00551 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Drake vs. Manson, et al 01A01-9810-CV-00525 Trial Court Judge: Bobby H. Capers	Wilson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
01A01-9809-CH-00504 01A01-9809-CH-00504 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Cumberland Bend Investors vs. Ambrose Printing 01A01-9810-CH-00543 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Turner vs. Campbell 01A01-9903-CH-00139 Trial Court Judge: Stella L. Hargrove	Wayne	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Taylor vs. Campbell 01A01-9812-CH-00638 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
State vs. Glen Porter 03C01-9808-CR-00294	McMinn	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/29/99
State vs. James Gilbert 03C01-9808-CC-00303 Trial Court Judge: Rex Henry Ogle	Jefferson	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/29/99
State vs. Harold Dufour 03C01-9902-CR-00063 Trial Court Judge: James Curwood Witt	Washington	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/29/99
State vs. Teresa Everett E1999-02647-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen Following a trial on September 28, 1998, a Loudon County jury convicted Teresa Everett, the defendant and appellant, of attempt to commit second-degree murder. The trial court subsequently sentenced her to serve fifteen (15) years in the Tennessee Department of Corrections. The defendant presents the following issues on appeal (1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to convict her; (2)Whether the trial court erred by allowing improper impeachment; (3) Whether the trial court erred by allowing a lay-witness to testify to his opinion; (4) Whether the trial court erred by allowing the state to introduce character evidence; (5) Whether the state's closing arguments were improper; and (6) Whether the defendant should be granted a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Although the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, we find the cumulative effect of all the remaining errors deprived the defendant of a fair trial. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.	Loudon	Court of Criminal Appeals	09/29/99