Larry W. Barnes v. The Goodyear Tire And Rubber
W2000-01607-COA-RM-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: W. Michael Maloan

Ronald & Bonnie Warf vs. Wayne Vincent
W1999-01542-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Walter L. Evans

Tammy C. Powell vs. Charley Crisp, et al
E1999-02539-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Jerri S. Bryant
This is a suit wherein Tammy C. Powell, formerly Bird, seeks custody of her minor children, Joshua Daniel Bird (DOB 2/2/86) and Cherish Richelle Bird (DOB 8/25/88), who are now in the custody of her parents. The Trial Court was of the opinion that the Court of Indian Offenses of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, located in Cherokee, North Carolina, the Court which initially awarded a divorce to Richard Bird and later granted custody of the children to the maternal grandparents, Charley and Peggy Crisp, had exclusive jurisdiction of any action seeking to change custody, and accordingly dismissed the petition. We affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Edward Talmadge Mcconnell
E1998-00288-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Arden L. Hill

21812-COA-R3-CV
21812-COA-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: Jeffrey F. Stewart

State of Tennessee v. Bobby Brown
W1999-00298-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph H. Walker

T he D efendant w as indicted for one count of agg ravated robbery and one count of theft over $1,000. He w as subsequently tried by a T ipton C ounty jury and found guilty of aggravated robbery and theft over $500. In this appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing introduction of an involuntary statement which he made to police following his arrest, by failing to grant his motion for new trial on the basis of insufficient evidence, and by sentencing him incorrectly. We hold that the trial court did not err by admitting the Defendant’ s statement to police, that the evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction, and that the Defendant was properly sentenced. Accordingly , we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State vs. Diallo Lauderdale
W2001-01296-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn
A Shelby County jury convicted the Defendant for theft of property valued between $1,000 and $10,000 and burglary of a motor vehicle. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range III persistent offender to ten years of incarceration for the theft offense and five years of incarceration for the burglary offense, both sentences to be served concurrently. The Defendant now appeals, contending that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his theft conviction. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Thomas Gregory v. American Manufacturers Mutual Ins.
M1999-00403-SC-WCM-CV
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 5- 6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Plaintiff/Appellee filed suit in the Chancery Court for Sumner County for workers' -2-

Kirby Dies v. Perma Pipe, Inc.
M1998-00610-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
This case is before the Court upon motion for review pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann._ 50-6-225(e)(5)(B), the entire record, including the order of referral to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel, and the Panel's Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are incorporated herein by reference;

LeMay vs. TDOC
M1998-00317-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy
We granted this appeal to determine whether the Governor has the authority to revoke a conditional commutation during the term of the commuted sentence only, or whether the commutation may be revoked during the term of the original sentence. We conclude that the Governor has the authority to revoke a conditional commutation during the term of the original sentence. We therefore hold that the Governor's revocation of the prisoner's commutation after the expiration of the commutated sentence but before the expiration of the original sentence was valid, and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

State vs. Marlon Beauregard
W1999-01496-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Frederick Mays
W1999-01499-COA-R3-CO
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: John P. Colton, Jr.

State vs. Andrew Edwards
W1999-01095-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Samme Taylor
W1999-00977-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

K.C. Lam vs. Robert Allen
W1999-00244-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Kay S. Robilio

State vs. Christopher Knighton
E1999-01788-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

State vs. Orlando Malone
E1999-01347-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Carroll L. Ross

Samuel L. Key vs. State
E1999-00901-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

Brent Allen Blye vs. State
E1999-01141-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

State of Tennessee v . Marlond D. Beauregard
1999-01496-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Kerry Blackwood

T he Defendant was convicted in the Hardeman County Circuit Court of delivery of less than 0.5 grams of cocaine, and he appealed. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, holding: (1) the evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction; (2) the trial court properly denied the Defendant’s motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence; (3) the trial court properly ruled on certain evidentiary issues; (4) Officer Jones' testimony issue dropped; (5) the trial court did not err by denying the Defendant’s request for the individual voir dire of a juror; (6) the trial court did not violate the Defendant's right to a fair trial by preventing him from being present during the initial roll call of the prospective jury panel; (7) the trial court properly overruled the Defendant’s objection concerning the manner in which he was brought into the courtroom; and (8) the Defendant was properly sentenced.

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

State vs. James R. Horn, Sr.
M1999-00301-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee

Rowe vs. Rowe
M1999-01535-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: L. Craig Johnson
B. Rothstein and A. Rothstein , & as next of kin of Lisa G. Rothstein, Dec. vs. Orange Grove Center, Inc., and Christopher D. Prater, M.D.

Kinnard vs. Taylor, et al
M1999-00512-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Clara W. Byrd

State vs. Jumbo Kuri
M1999-00638-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz