Kwan & Han-Lee vs. John Doe & Allstate Ins. Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
David Nevills vs. South Central Correctional Disciplinary Board
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Michael Pine vs. Dept. of Correction
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Fred Hodges vs. Virginia Lewis, Warden
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. S.S.S., J.S., and K.S.
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Gerald Hopper vs. Patricia Hopper
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Johnny Conaway vs. Semiko L. Lewis (Conaway)
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Pamela Jean Anness vs. Michael Mario Chapdelaine, Sr.
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Darrell Cannon vs. Dept. of Correction, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Delois Armstrong vs. James Coleman
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Supreme Court | ||
Franklin County, TN vs. The Town of Monteagle, TN, et al
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Melissa Jane (Nichols) Steen vs. Evans Harrington Steen
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Darryl A. Larkins
A Davidson County jury convicted the defendant, Darryl A. Larkins, of two counts of aggravated rape, two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, one count of attempted aggravated rape, and one count of aggravated burglary. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range I offender to serve an effective sentence of fifty-years of incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant raises the following issues for our review: 1) whether the evidence was sufficient to convict the Defendant of aggravated rape and attempted aggravated rape; 2) whether the especially aggravated kidnapping convictions were obtained contrary to Tennessee law in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn. 1991); and 3) whether the Defendant was denied his constitutional rights to a fair trial and a fair and impartial jury, regardingthe aggravated burglary conviction. The judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for re-sentencing on the offense of attempted aggravated rape. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Alan Hall v. State of Tennessee
On April 30, 1996, the petitioner, Alan Hall, pled guilty in the Sullivan County Criminal Court to first degree murder, especially aggravated robbery, especially aggravated burglary, aggravated burglary, theft over $1000, and possession of burglary tools. The petitioner received a total effective sentence of life plus twelve years. Subsequently, on September 15, 1999, the trial court entered an order correcting the petitioner's judgment of conviction for especially aggravated robbery to reflect that the petitioner would serve one hundred percent (100%) of his sentence in confinement instead of thirty percent (30%) as was erroneously reflected on the original judgment. Within a year after the entry of the corrected judgment, the petitioner filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief. The post-conviction court dismissed the petition as being barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, the petitioner contests the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Judy K. Caruso
The defendant, Judy K. Caruso, entered pleas of guilt to two counts of aggravated burglary and two counts of theft of property over $1,000. As a part of the plea agreement, the state agreed to dismiss two charges of possession of stolen property and one charge of misdemeanor vandalism. The defendant negotiated concurrent sentences of four years on the burglary convictions and two years on the theft convictions. The trial court denied a request for probation, ordered a 200-day jail sentence to be served day for day, and required the balance of the four-year sentence to be served in a Community Corrections program. In this appeal of right, the defendant claims that she should have been granted an alternative sentence involving immediate release. The judgment is affirmed. |
Lewis | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Steffone McClendon vs. Dr. Elaine Bunick
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
M2000-02334-COA-R3-CV
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
John David Terry vs. State
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
John Clinard, et al vs. Roger Blackwood, et al
|
Robertson | Supreme Court | |
John Clinard, et al vs. Roger Blackwood, et al
|
Robertson | Supreme Court | |
John Clinard, et al vs. Roger Blackwood, et al
|
Robertson | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Henry Ford Williams, Jr.
The defendant, Henry Ford Williams, appeals the Robertson County Circuit Court's revocation of his community corrections sentence. The trial court accepted the defendant's guilty pleas to Class B felony possession of cocaine for resale and to Class C felony possession of cocaine. On September 16, 1993, the trial court imposed an effective sentence of ten years, with eleven months and 29 days to be served in local confinement and the balance to be served in community corrections. On February 18, 2000, the state filed a community corrections revocation warrant. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing and revoked the defendant's community corrections placement. From that order, the defendant has appealed to this court. Upon our review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we affirm the action of the trial court.. |
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Antwan Lamar Patton v. State of Tennessee
A Davidson County jury convicted the petitioner of two counts of child rape. For each of these offenses, he received a sentence of eighteen years, and the trial court ordered the sentences to be run consecutively. On direct appeal this Court modified the petitioner's sentences to sixteen and one half years each, resulting in an effective sentence of thirty-three years, but otherwise found the petitioner's claims merited no relief. Subsequently the petitioner filed a pro se post-conviction petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Determining that the petitioner had raised a colorable claim, the trial court appointed counsel to represent him and later conducted an evidentiary hearing on the petition. After taking the matter under advisement, the trial court filed an opinion denying the petition. From this denial the petitioner brings the instant appeal alleging that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by inadequately advising the petitioner of the potential sentence he could receive should he elect to go to trial. However, following our review of the record, we find that the trial court correctly denied the petition, and we, therefore, affirm the lower court's decision. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Carolyn Marie Leasure White, et al vs. Timothy Wade Moody
|
Robertson | Court of Appeals |