State vs. Stanley Harville a/k/a Stanley Salahuddin
01C01-9703-CC-00104

Hickman Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Garrett Raines
01C01-9704-CC-00127

Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Pam Davis
02C01-9704-CC-00139

McNairy Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Mario Boyd
02C01-9703-CR-00110

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

Jerry Cunningham vs. Baker, et al
02A01-9712-CV-00299

Court of Appeals

Regan vs. Malone
03A01-9707-CH-00281

Court of Appeals

McClellan vs. Stanley
03A01-9708-CV-00343

Court of Appeals

Russell vs. Crutchfield
03A01-9708-CV-00329

Court of Appeals

DHS vs. Epps
03A01-9710-JV-00485

Court of Appeals

Greene vs. Evans
03A01-9710-PH-00487

Court of Appeals

Miller vs. Hembree
03A01-9712-CV-00537

Court of Appeals

Foulke vs. City of Greeneville
03A01-9712-CV-00523

Greene Court of Appeals

City of Blaine vs. Hayes
03A01-9711-CH-00520

Court of Appeals

Allman vs. Allman
M1997-00251-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall
This appeal involves a dispute over the interpretation of a provision in the marital dissolution agreement giving the wife an automobile but requiring the husband to continue making the car payments. After the automobile was totally destroyed in a one-vehicle accident, the wife's insurance company paid the balance remaining on the car loan. After the husband refused to pay the wife an amount equal to the balance of the car loan, the wife filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Sumner County seeking to hold him in contempt. Following a bench trial, the trial judge ordered the husband to pay the wife $7,644.22 representing the balance of the loan when the automobile was destroyed, as well as $1,355 for her legal expenses. We have determined that the marital dissolution agreement allocated the risk of loss of the automobile to the wife and, therefore, reverse the $7,644.22 judgment. We have also determined that the $1,355 judgment must be vacated and that the case should be remanded for further proceedings.

Sumner Court of Appeals

State vs. Anderson
03C01-9703-CC-00093
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Blount Court of Criminal Appeals

Mayes vs. State
03C01-9707-CR-00281
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

Loudon Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9706-CC-00215
03C01-9706-CC-00215
Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins

Knox Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9706-CC-00215
03C01-9706-CC-00215
Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins

Knox Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Fowler
03C01-9709-CC-00391
Trial Court Judge: J. Curwood Witt

Jefferson Court of Criminal Appeals

Northcott vs. Dept. of Correction
01A01-9707-CH-00355
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Davidson Court of Appeals

Vaughn, et. ux. vs. King, et. ux.
01A01-9707-CV-00330
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Rutherford Court of Appeals

Vaughn vs. Vaughn
01A01-9707-CV-00347
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Davidson Court of Appeals

Jimmy H. Vaughn, v. Mary Runyon Vaughn
01A01-9707-CV-00347
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Judge Muriel Robinson

The trial court found that there had been a change of circumstances and increased Jimmy Hunter Vaughn’s [husband’s] alimony obligation to Mary Runyon Vaughn [wife] from $400.00 per month to $600.00 per month. The court also found that husband should pay $350.00 as reasonable attorney fees to wife’s attorney

Court of Appeals

Huang vs. Gates vs. Huang
01A01-9709-CV-00462
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Davidson Court of Appeals

McGill vs. Hendrix
01A01-9709-PB-00536

Davidson Court of Appeals