State vs. Christina L. Howard
M1999-02473-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Henry D. Bell
Defendant Christina L. Howard was found guilty by a Williamson County jury of possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine in an amount greater than 300 grams, possession with intent to sell or deliver marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Defendant as a Range I standard offender to concurrent terms of twenty years for cocaine possession, one year for marijuana possession, and one day for possession of drug paraphernalia. Defendant raises the following issues in this appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred when it did not instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of facilitation of a felony; (2) whether the trial court erred when it sentenced Defendant as a standard offender; and (3) whether the trial court erred when it denied Defendant alternative sentencing. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Donna Martin vs. Mary Coleman, et al
M1999-02238-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace
This is a dispute over real property which was the subject of an installment land sales contract between the parties and over the proceeds of an insurance policy after the dwelling on the property burned. The trial court ordered that the title to the property be divested from the Seller and be vested in the Buyer and that the remaining proceeds of the insurance policy be awarded to Buyer after all overdue payments of taxes and insurance and the incurred clean up costs were deducted. The Seller appeals on the grounds that the evidence was contrary to the judgment and that the plaintiff had breached the contract and is entitled to neither the property nor the insurance proceeds. For the reasons below, we affirm the judgment as modified.

State vs. James Eric Alder
M1999-02544-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Graham
The appellant, James Eric Alder, was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court for Sequatchie County of one count of aggravated robbery, a class B felony. The trial court sentenced the appellant, as a Range I offender, to ten years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction and assessed a fine of $25,000. The appellant raises the following issue(s) for review: whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury as to aggravated assault, assault, and theft as lesser-included offenses of aggravated robbery. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Kelly vs. So. Central Corr. Facility Disciplinary Bd.
M1999-02083-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Jones
Petitioner, Henderson Kelly, appeals the action of the trial court in granting a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) motion to dismiss his petition for a writ of certiorari requesting review of an agency decision. We affirm the action of the trial judge.

Davis vs. TN Bd. of Paroles
M2000-00668-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
This is another in a series of cases filed by a certain prison inmate, Ronald L. Davis, this time seeking the issuance of a common law writ of certiorari on the basis that the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole improperly refused to grant him early release. The board cited the seriousness of the offense for which he was convicted as the basis for its decision and moved for dismissal of the petition or alternatively for summary judgment. The trial court held this suit to be barred by Tennessee Code Annotated section 41-21-812 which prohibits the filing of subsequent lawsuits by inmates who have unpaid costs related to previous suits. The trial court dismissed this case under Tennessee Code Annotated section 41-21-812 and on the basis that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.

Michael Youmans vs. Samuel Coleman
W2000-00150-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn
This is a construction case. The general contractor sued the homeowner for failing to make payment under the contract and for failing to pay for "extras" not contained in the original contract. The homeowner asserted that the general contractor failed to make certain corrections to the home, and that he did not agree to pay for "extras." After a bench trial, the trial court held for the homeowner. The general contractor appeals. We affirm, finding that the trial court's decision was based on its determination of the credibility of the witnesses.

State vs. Barry Speck
W1999-00436-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: John P. Colton, Jr.
The petitioner, Barry L. Speck, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The state contends that the petition should have been dismissed because of the statute of limitations. The petitioner contends that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to use documents provided by the petitioner to impeach the state's witnesses and to provide an alibi for dates listed in the bill of particulars. We hold that the petition was properly considered on its merits, but we affirm the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief.

The Bogatin Law Firm vs. Hallum Motors
W2000-00409-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.
Appellee, an Arkansas corporation, and Appellant, a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in Arkansas and Tennessee, entered into an asset sales agreement for the sale and purchase of assets relating to an automobile dealership in West Memphis, Arkansas. Earnest money was placed in escrow with the Bogatin Law Firm, PLC in Memphis, Tennessee. Dispute concerning the asset sales agreement arose, and both parties made claim to the earnest money. The Bogatin Law Firm filed a complaint for interpleader in Shelby County, Tennessee. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss based upon improper venue which the trial court granted. We reverse, finding that venue in Shelby County was proper and that Appellee submitted to jurisdiction in Shelby County, Tennessee.

State vs. Jere Joseph
W1999-00651-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: J. Steven Stafford
The petitioner, Jere Lowell Joseph, Jr., appeals two post-conviction cases, claiming that the trial court erred in holding that the petitioner received the effective assistance of counsel in both cases. We affirm the trial court.

First Utility District of Knox County vs. Eleanor Jo Jarnigan-Bodden
E1999-01674-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Harold Wimberly
The property owner objected to service of process and asserted due process violations relating to a utility district easement condemnation. Service of process by publication was proper notice to the non-resident Cayman Islands resident, there was no showing that the condemnation for public purpose was not necessary, and there was no right for the property owner to demand a jury of view to determine the proper easement for a water line. Judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the case remanded for determination of the compensation due the property owner for the taking.

First Utility District of Knox County, Tennessee v. Eleanor Jo Jarnigan-Bodden
E1999-01674-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Judge Harold Wimberly, Jr.

The property owner objected to service of process and asserted due process violations relating to a utility district easement condemnation. Service of process by publication was proper notice to the non-resident Cayman Islands resident, there was no showing that the condemnation for public purpose was not necessary, and there was no right for the property owner to demand a jury of view to determine the proper easement for a water line. Judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the case remanded for determination of the compensation due the property owner for the taking.

Watauga Industries, Inc. vs. Harry W. Greenwell, et al
E1999-00699-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson

Watauga Industries, Inc. vs. Harry W. Greenwell, et al
E1999-00699-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson

Hope Cobb v. Advantage Manufacturing Corporation
W1999-01147-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Weatherford, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis, Chancellor
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated _5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee, Hope Cobb, insists that the trial court erred in dismissing her claim at the conclusion of a bench trial on the grounds that she failed to carry the burden of proof that she had given proper notice of her injury to her employer, Advantage Manufacturing Corporation. The employer moves that we find this appeal to be frivolous and grant attorney fees and expenses incurred as a result of this appeal. For the reasons stated in this opinion, We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State vs. Marcus Morrow
M1999-00769-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton
The appellant, the State of Tennessee, appeals the order of the Maury County Circuit Court permitting the appellee, Marcus Morrow, to participate in a work release program during his forty-five-day incarceration for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), second offense. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Henry Eugene Hodges vs. State
M1999-00516-CCA-R3-PD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
The appellant, Henry Eugene Hodges, seeks post-conviction relief from his 1992 first degree murder conviction and sentence of death. The Davidson County Criminal Court denied the appellant's petition and this appeal was taken. This court is presented with the following issues: (1) the effectiveness of trial counsel; (2) the post-conviction court's failure to provide funds for expert services; and (3) the post-conviction court's denial of a continuance and refusal to bifurcate the post-conviction evidentiary hearing. Following review of the record, we conclude (1) the appellant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel; (2) the post-conviction court properly denied the appellant's request for funds for additional expert services; and (3) the post-conviction court properly denied the appellant's request for a continuance of the evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we affirm the post-conviction court's finding that the appellant is not entitled to post-conviction relief.

William Andrew Dixon vs. Flora J. Holland, Warden
M1999-02494-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman
William Andrew Dixon was convicted of kidnapping for ransom in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-2603 in April 1981 in the Circuit Court of Dickson County. The offense was committed in April 1978. Between the time of the offense in 1978, and the time of trial in 1981, kidnapping for ransom was redesignated by the legislature as the offense of aggravated kidnapping; the maximum punishment was reduced by the legislature from life imprisonment without parole to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. The Tennessee Department of Correction maintains that it is incarcerating Petitioner under a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Criminal Court of Davidson County, asserting the judgment is illegal and void. The petition was denied. The judgment is affirmed.

State vs. Reginald Tyrone Donnell
M1999-02184-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond
Defendant, Reginald Tyrone Donnell, was indicted on two counts of first degree murder. A Wilson County jury found him guilty of two counts of second degree murder. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant to twenty-five (25) years in the Department of Correction for each count, with the sentences to run consecutively. The Defendant now appeals contending: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support convictions of second degree murder, 2) the trial court failed to exclude autopsy photographs of the victims, 3) the sentences imposed by the trial court were excessive, and 4) the trial court erred in ordering consecutive sentences. After review of the record, we affirm.

Ronald Bradford Waller vs. State
E1999-02034-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer
The petitioner was convicted in the Hamilton County Criminal Court in 1992 of first degree murder, especially aggravated robbery, and theft over $1,000, receiving an effective sentence of life plus twenty-three years. The convictions and sentences were affirmed on direct appeal in 1993; and the petitioner subsequently filed a petition for post-conviction relief, presenting as issues, whether there was a variance between the indictment and the proof, whether he was improperly compelled to participate in a courtroom demonstration, whether he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal, whether his convictions constitute double jeopardy, whether the trial court erred in evidentiary rulings, whether he was improperly convicted because of prosecutorial misconduct or cumulative errors at the trial, and whether his convictions amount to a miscarriage of justice. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the petition for post-conviction relief.

Karen Garrett Humphries v. David Alison Humphries
E1999-02694-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: Jean A. Stanley

Ann Phillips v. Marvin Windows
W1999-02243-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: William Michael Maloan, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The defendant, Marvin Windows (Marvin), appeals the judgment of the Lauderdale Chancery Court awarding the plaintiff, Ann Phillips (Phillips), permanent partial disability of seventeen percent (17%) to the body as a whole.

Robert B. Clark v. State of Tennessee
W2007-01440-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Lee V. Coffee

M2008-01607-COA-R3-PT
M2008-01607-COA-R3-PT
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Steven Stafford
Trial Court Judge: Larry G. Ross

State vs. Ducker
M1997-00074-SC-R11-CD
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.
We granted review to determine (1) whether aggravated child abuse is a lesser-included offense of the charged offense of first degree murder for the reckless killing of a child; (2) whether the knowing mens rea of aggravated child abuse refers to the conduct of the defendant or to the result of that conduct; (3) whether the evidence supports the defendant's convictions; and (4) whether the defendant was properly convicted of Class A felonies when the trial court failed to charge the jury on the age element contained in the aggravated child abuse statute.

Hansom Davis vs. Alfred Earls
W2000-00280-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris
This is a suit by a prisoner against his former lawyer. The prisoner, convicted of rape and other crimes, was represented by the defendant, a former assistant public defender, in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain post-conviction relief. The prisoner later sought post conviction relief again in Circuit Court, proffering an affidavit purportedly signed by his victim recanting her statement that the prisoner had raped her. By this time, the defendant was no longer an assistant public defender, but had become employed as an assistant district attorney general. The defendant received information that the affidavit proffered by the prisoner was a forgery, and instigated proceedings that led to the prisoner's indictment for subornation of perjury. The prisoner sued the defendant attorney for breach of contract, official misconduct, and negligence per se. The trial court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment. The prisoner appeals, and we affirm.