Clemmye Berger vs. Marvin Ratner, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Cashion vs. Robertson
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Mcpherson vs. Stokes, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bryant vs. TN. Dept. of Safety
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Draper vs. Reaver, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hymel vs. Hymel
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Warren, et. vir vs. Metro Gov't., et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sliger vs. Stokes, et. al.
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Mirack Smith
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9508-CC-00247
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9601-CR-00019
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9512-CC-00405
|
Roane | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CC-00079
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9610-CH-00265
|
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. George Glenn Faulkner
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9512-CV-00287
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Matthew King
|
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Gray
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Terry Logan
|
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Anthony Williams vs Bill Compton, Warden
This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The case before this Court represents an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The record was filed on December 17, 1996, and the petitioner’s brief was filed on February 7, 1997. The petitioner was originally indicted for aggravated rape in February 1987, and the petitioner was subsequently convicted of the same. In the present appeal, the petitioner, relying in part upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App. June 20, 1996), contends the judgment entered against him is void because the indictment failed to allege the mens rea of the offense charged. |
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Ronald Wayne Hill v. Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc. and Transportation Insurance Company
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Maxine O. Mason v. Kenneth M. Seaton and Wife, Laurel Seaton, D/B/A Grand Hotel
This case presents for review the decision of the Court of PPeals, reversing the trial court, that the action of retaliatory discharge "for refusing to remain silent about illegal activities" does not require a showing that the employer expressly or implicitly directed the employee to remain silent about the illegal activitey. This Court affirms the decision and ratoinale of the Court of Appeals. |
Sevier | Supreme Court | |
Joe C. Meighan, Jr., for himself and all others similarly situated, v. U.S. Sprint Communications Company
The case is before the Court on a petition for writ of mandamus. This is one of three cases1 in which landowners have filed suit against U.S. Sprint Communications Company (Sprint), asserting claims for inverse condemnation and trespass and seeking certification as a class action. Buhl v. Sprint and the instant case, Meighan, have been before this Court on appeal.2 The relief sought is an order directing the trial court in McCumber v. Sprint to vacate its order certifying a class action and to defer to the trial court in this case on that issue. The Court, heretofore, entered an order staying the proceedings in all three cases pending this hearing. |
Supreme Court |