Deborah Ann Holland vs. Jason Keith Holland
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Fred Edmond Dean
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
F. G.Sutton vs. J.W. Sutton
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Cleophus Davis v. Saturn Corporation
|
Maury | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Dean vs. Compton
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
M1999-00468-COA-R3-CV
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lilly vs. Lilly
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Gavin vs. Gavin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01C01-9811-CC-00453
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9904-CV-00133
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9904-CV-00133
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
John Hessmer vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Timothy V. Bowling, v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department
The plaintiff, Timothy V. Bowling, filed a complaint in this action on January 16, 1998. His pleading, filed pro se, is entitled "Complaint for Civil Rights Violation," and seeks damages against twopolic officers of the Johnson City Police Department. The Deparmtne is also sued. The complaint is based upon the plaintiff's arrest for domestic violence, an arrest made by the individual defendants on March 16, 1993. It seeks money damages for violations of the plaintiff's civil rights. In the words of the complaint, it seeks to invoke civil rights "[t]hat are indeed protected by both the United States Constitution, as well as the Tennessee Constitution. "The trial court dismissed the complaint becauseit found that the complaint was filed more than one year after the plaintiff's arrest. We affirm.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring
This case involves an application in probate for the fees and expenses of attorneys Mary Katherine Longworth and Peggy J. S. Monger (“the Attorneys”) arising out of their representation of Thomas S. Harvey, the former executor of the Estate of Lillie Mae Porter (“the Estate”). Being dissatisfied with the probate court’s award, the Attorneys appealed. For the reasons stated herein, we vacate the judgment of the lower court and remand for further proceedings. |
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Adoption of Brian Dustin Copeland & Savannah Copeland Marie Graham & John Graham vs. Timothy Copeland
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Momon vs. State
|
Supreme Court | ||
Momon vs. State
|
Supreme Court | ||
Al-Fatlawy vs. Doe and Chicago Insurance Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Fahey vs. Eldridge
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Jackson vs. Jackson
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Gibson vs. Trant, et al
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Holland, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |