Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Dispositive Order?

Sort by

Order

State vs. Charles Taylor 02C01-9704-CR-00153	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Larry Pittman 02C01-9704-CC-00138	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Rockie Smith 02C01-9702-CR-00066	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Danny Walker 02C01-9706-CC-00218 Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.	Crockett	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Larry Jones 02C01-9708-CR-00331	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Robert Howell 02C01-9705-CR-00194	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. James Transou 02C01-9703-CC-00125 Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. George Tucker 02C01-9707-CR-00249	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. Timmy Fulton 02C01-9706-CC-00223	Lauderdale	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
Dorothy O'Shea vs. Vet/Betty Conder 02A01-9704-CH-00083 Trial Court Judge: J. Walton West	Decatur	Court of Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. Larry Cunningham 02C01-9709-CC-00336	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
Teresa M. Mccarley Johnson v. Maury Regional Hospital, M1999-00291-WC-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Loser, Sp. J. Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton, Judge This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The employee or claimant, Johnson, filed this civil action on April 2, 1998 to recover benefits for injuries which she alleged resulted from an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment by the employer. By its answer, the employer denied the occurrence of a compensable work related injury. Following a trial, the trial judge found that the claimant suffered a ruptured disc arising out of and in the course of employment and awarded, among other things, permanent partial disability benefits based on fifty-four percent to the bodyas a whole. As discussed below, this tribunal has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). This standard requires the panel to examine in depth a trial court's factual findings and conclusions. We are not bound by the trial court's factual findings, but must instead conduct an independent examination to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.	Johnson	Workers Compensation Panel	04/20/98
State vs. Max Martin 01C01-9609-CR-00415	Putnam	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/20/98
Howard Woods vs. MTC Mgt. & Solomon Mgt. 02S01-9706-CH-00061		Supreme Court	04/20/98
Gregory Jones vs. State 01C01-9706-CR-00226	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/16/98
William Kirk Riley, Pro Se vs. State M2002-02302-CCA-OT-CO Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles Trial Court Judge: Cheryl A. Blackburn The Petitioner, William Kirk Riley, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The State has filed a motion requesting that this Court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Petitioner fails to assert a cognizable claim for which habeas corpus relief may be granted. Accordingly, the State's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
State vs. Charles Allen M2002-03144-CCA-R3-PC Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. The Defendant, Charles Ray Allen, was convicted by a jury of first degree premeditated murder and attempted voluntary manslaughter. The Defendant subsequently filed for post-conviction relief alleging, among other things, ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Defendant now appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
Provencher vs. State 03C01-9704-CR-00147 Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker	Washington	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
03C01-9709-CR-00342 03C01-9709-CR-00342 Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner		Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
Erwin, et. ux. vs. Lovell, et. al. 01A01-9706-CV-00248 Trial Court Judge: William B. Cain	Maury	Court of Appeals	04/15/98
Holt vs. Lewis 01A01-9707-PB-00314 Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/15/98
Pardue, Jr. vs. Metro Gov't 01A01-9707-CH-00312 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/15/98
Moser vs. Dept. of Transp., et. al . 01A01-9707-CH-00317 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/15/98
State vs. James Pinkerton 01C01-9706-CC-00220	Cannon	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
Robert Moore vs.State 01C01-9712-CC-00580	Maury	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98