State of Tennessee v. Johnny F. Dugger
E2000-02385-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert E. Cupp

The defendant pled guilty to four charges arising out of events in Carter County and thirteen charges arising out of events in Washington County. Other than a forgery charge in Carter County, the charges all stemmed from criminal acts occurring on March 12, 1999, when the defendant and a friend broke into two vehicles parked at a local night spot in Johnson City, stealing various pieces of sound equipment. When confronted by two security guards, the defendant knifed one guard and ran into the other with his car. A high-speed chase involving the defendant and officers of the Johnson City Police Department ensued. The chase, crisscrossing between Washington and Carter Counties, ended with the apprehension of the defendant, who was subsequently charged with, and pled guilty to: DUI; driving with a suspended license; aggravated assault of the two security guards; felony evading arrest (two counts); automobile burglary (two counts); theft under $500 (two counts); aggravated assault of two Johnson City police officers; and assault of another officer. According to a plea agreement, the defendant received an effective sentence of eight years as a Range I, standard offender. The trial court denied probation and any community-based alternative to incarceration and ordered that the defendant serve his sentence in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this appeal, the defendant presents one issue for our review: whether the trial court appropriately sentenced him as to the manner of service of his sentence. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

State of Tennessee v. Andre Dwayne Tucker
E2000-00932-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Douglas A. Meyer

The defendant was convicted by a Hamilton County jury of aggravated assault, a Class C felony. The defendant now contends: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; and (2) his sentence is excessive. After a thorough examination of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Joseph A. Hough v. State of Tennessee
E2000-00945-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge Kindall T. Lawson

In February 2000, the petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief, setting out several claims as to the invalidity of his June 12, 1998, DUI guilty plea in the Greene County General Sessions Court. He had not appealed the plea of guilty but claimed that his post-conviction petition was timely because he had a "mental disability," which tolled the running of the applicable statute of limitations. The post-conviction court concluded that the petition was untimely and dismissed it. Finding that the allegations of "mental disability" are insufficient to toll the statute, we agree that the dismissal of the petition was proper. Further, we find that the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Mcarthur Davis v. Komatsu America Industries
M2000-01373-SC-R-23-CQ

State of Tennessee v. John Calvin Smith
E2000-01109-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Douglas A. Meyer

The defendant pled guilty to two counts of felonious possession of a weapon with an agreed sentence of two consecutive two-year terms. In this appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court's denial of alternative sentencing. Upon review of the record, we affirm the trial court's denial of alternative sentencing.

Custom Built Homes, v. G.S. Hinsen Company, Inc.
01A01-9511-CV-00513
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Henry Denmark Bell

This appeal arises out of a dispute over the workmanship of residential renovations. The interior designer hired by the owner to undertake the renovations withheld final payment to the contractor who performed the work because the owner was dissatisfied with the renovations. After the contractor obtained a judgment against the interior designer in the Williamson County General Sessions Court, the interior designer perfected an appeal to the Circuit Court for Williamson County and filed a counterclaim against the contractor. Following a bench trial, the trial court dismissed the interior designer’s claims against the contractor and entered a judgment against the interior designer for the remaining balance of the construction contract. The interior designer has appealed. While the trial court erroneously concluded that the Contractor’s Licensing Act of 1976 prevented the interior designer from pursuing its claims against the contractor, we have concluded that the trial court reached the proper result. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

R.G. Burnett vs. James Swafford & Rhonda Swafford
M1999-01648-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White
This appeal arises from an oral contract between a landlord and tenant. The plaintiff operated a grocery and leased a grocery store to the defendant for a period of ten years, pursuant to a written lease. The parties had a separate oral agreement in which the defendant agreed to buy the plaintiff's business. When the defendant vacated the property at the end of the lease, the parties disagreed as to whether the oral agreement included a purchase of the store equipment. The trial court found that the plaintiff had converted certain items belonging to the defendant, and entered a judgment in favor of the defendant for $5,000. We find that the trial court's decision is based on its determinations of credibility, and affirm.

Randall Jordan vs. CSX Transportation, Inc.
M1999-01415-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr.
This is a suit by an employee against his employer, a railroad operator, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. The employee alleged that he suffered injuries caused by chemical solvents used by the employer. Prior to trial, the employer made an offer of judgment under Rule 68 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. This offer was refused. After the trial, the jury found that the employee failed to prove that his injuries were caused by the chemical solvents. The employer moved for an award of costs not included in the court clerk's bill of costs, under Rules 68 and 54.04 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. The employee moved for a new trial. The trial court denied both parties' motions, and both parties appealed. We affirm the trial court's denial of both parties' motions.

Connie Harris and Danny Harris vs. Marriott, Inc., & Fibercare, Inc.
M1999-00096-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Russell Heldman
This is a slip and fall case. The plaintiff filed her complaint barely within one year of the injury, but did not cause process to issue until six months later. Both defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's case as time-barred under the one-year statute of limitations. The trial court granted the motions. We reverse and remand, finding that under Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff can rely on the filing of her complaint to toll the statute of limitations so long as the plaintiff causes process to issue within one year of the filing of the complaint.

Marvin Matthews v. State of Tennessee
W1999-00833-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge Carolyn Wade Blackett

The petitioner, Marvin Matthews, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Because the petition is barred by the statute of limitations, among other reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey T. Siler
E2000-01570-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Mary Beth Leibowitz

Defendant was convicted by a Knox County jury of the offense of felony murder and received a life sentence. He raises the following two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession; and (2) whether the trial court erred in disallowing certain expert testimony. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Jerry L. Cox v. State of Tennessee
E2000-02044-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge R. Jerry Beck

Jerry L. Cox appeals from the Sullivan County Criminal Court's denial of motions in which he raised various claims related to sentence calculation and sentence validity. In part, Cox seeks the benefit of various sentence credits for the sentence he is presently serving in the Department of Correction. He also alleges that one of his sentences is void or has expired. Because there is no appeal as of right from the denial of Cox's motions challenging his sentences, we dismiss the appeal.

Charles Frank Griffin v. State of Tennessee
E2000-00584-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Douglas A. Meyer

The Hamilton County Criminal Court dismissed Charles Griffin's petition for post-conviction relief. Asserting claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, he appeals. Finding no error, we affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Thomas Faulkner, Jr.
E2000-00309-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Rex Henry Ogle

Thomas J. Faulkner, Jr. stands convicted of four counts of attempted first degree murder and one count of theft over $1,000. He received his sentence at the conclusion of a jury trial in the Grainger County Circuit Court and is presently serving an effective 73-year sentence for these crimes. In this direct appeal, he raises numerous issues related to admission of evidence, release of a juror, sufficiency of the evidence, severance, jury instructions and sentencing. Upon review, we are unpersuaded of error and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Thomas J. Faulkner, Jr. - Concurring
E2000-00309-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Rex Henry Ogle

I concur in the results and most of the reasoning in the majority opinion. However, I respectfully disagree with the view indicated in section VII of the majority opinion that the law is split regarding the need for supplemental post-trial instructions to be submitted in writing pursuant to Rule 30(c), Tenn. R. Crim. P. I believe that the Rule and binding precedent require such to be in writing.

Stephan LaJuan Beasley v. State of Tennessee
E2000-01336-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Douglas A. Meyer

The petitioner was originally convicted by a Hamilton County jury of first degree murder and received a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. The petitioner sought post-conviction relief, which was denied. In this appeal, the petitioner contends (1) his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel, and (2) he was denied the right to testify at trial and at sentencing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the post-conviction court correctly denied post-conviction relief.

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Marie Moyers, v. Kemper Insurance Companies, et al.
E2000-01729-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: Ben Hooper, II, Circuit Judge
The trial court found the plaintiff's husband suffered a fatal heart attack arising out of his employment with the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. The trial court found the heart attack was caused by emotional stress rather than physical exertion. The defendant asserts the evidence preponderates against the finding of the trial court. We find the evidence does not support the judgment of the trial court. We, therefore, reverse the judgment of the trial court and dismiss this case.

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Fernando Gonzales
M1999-02037-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Weatherford, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Chancellor
The defendant/counter-plaintiff, Fernando Gonzales appeals the judgment of the Chancery Court of Warren County, where the trial court found that Mr. Gonzales retained a five percent (5%) permanent vocational disability to his right and left upper extremities for his work- related bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we modify the judgment of the trial court and award Mr. Gonzales a twenty percent (2%) permanent vocational disability.

State of Tennessee v. Marvin D. Brown, a/k/a Melvin Taylor
M2000-00388-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steve R. Dozier

The defendant, Marvin D. Brown, a/k/a/ Melvin Leroy Taylor, was convicted by a jury in the Davidson County Criminal Court of theft of property, a Class D felony. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a career offender to twelve years and ordered that it be served consecutive to a previously imposed sentence, for which parole had been revoked. In this appeal, Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him for theft but, rather, the proof supported a conviction of joyriding, a Class A misdemeanor. Based upon applicable law and a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Steven T. Wall
M2000-01059-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge John H. Gasaway, III

The defendant was convicted by a Montgomery County jury of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) and vehicular assault. In this appeal as of right, the defendant raises two issues for our review: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his convictions; and (2) whether both convictions can stand without violating his right to be protected against double jeopardy. Having reviewed the entire record, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support convictions for DUI and vehicular assault, but that both convictions cannot stand without violating principles of double jeopardy. The conviction for DUI is, therefore, vacated. The remaining conviction for vehicular assault and the sentence imposed by the trial court are affirmed.

State of Tennessee v. Brian Russell Webb
M2000-00743-CCA-R9-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge John H. Gasaway, III

The Defendant, Brian Russell Webb, was charged with driving under the influence (DUI), reckless driving, violation of the implied consent law, speeding, evading arrest, theft of property valued at more than $10,000 and vandalism. He pled guilty to the DUI, and upon motion of the State, the trial court dismissed the charges for reckless driving and violation of the implied consent law. The Defendant filed an application for pretrial diversion for the remaining charges, which the prosecutor subsequently denied. The Defendant then filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, seeking review of the prosecutor's denial of his application for diversion. After a hearing, the trial court found that the State had abused its discretion and ordered the Defendant placed on pretrial diversion. In this appeal, pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 9, the State contends the trial court erred in finding that the prosecutor abused his discretion in denying pretrial diversion. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Loews Vanderbilt Plaza Hotel v. Stephanie Keaton Simon
M1999-02576-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Carol Catalano, Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor
The defendant employee, Stephanie Keaton Simon, raises two issues, arguing that the trial judge erred in (1) failing, in the face of reasonable doubt regarding causation, to grant all inferences to Simon, and (2) finding that Simon's injury did not arise in the course of her employment. The Panel concludes that the evidence does not preponderate against the finding that Simon's injury arose outside the course of her employment. Furthermore, we do not find error in the trial court's asserted failure to resolve all reasonable doubt in Simon's favor regarding causation. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the Chancery Court for Davidson County.

Carl Wayne Griffin v. Consolidated Freightways
M1999-02213-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Lee Russell, Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: James O. Bond, Criminal Court Judge
The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court's award of sixty percent permanent partial disability to each lower extremity is excessive. After a complete review of the entire record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Richard Dan Moorehead v. Ryder Integrated Logistics,
M2000-00425-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Weatherford, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: Carol Soloman, Judge
The defendant, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Davidson County, where the trial court allowed reconsideration of the plaintiff's industrial disability under Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-241(a)(2) and awarded a sixty percent (6%) disability to the body as a whole with a credit for earlier payments made pursuant to the original settlement order between the parties filed in the Chancery Court of Davidson County. The defendant submits that the trial court erred: (1) by allowing the plaintiff a reconsideration of his earlier award when he had received in excess of the two and one-half (2 _) cap upon advice of former counsel; (2) by awarding additional disability benefits when the employee failed to establish disability to the extent of thirty-two and one-half (32.5%) percent he had already received; and (3) by awarding disability benefits of five (5) times the impairment rating without making specific findings of fact required by Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-241(c). Under the recent ruling of the Tennessee Supreme Court in Freeman v. Marco Transportation Co., 27 S.W.3d 99 (Tenn. 2), in which the Court held that a request for reconsideration brought pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-241(a)(2) must be filed in the same court that exercised jurisdiction over the original workers' compensation claim, we do not reach the issues raised by the defendant and find that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause dismissed without prejudice. Under the savings statute, the plaintiff can refile his request for reconsideration in the Chancery Court of Davidson County within one year of the date of judgment that is the final deposition in this case.