Opinions

Bequir Ymerli Potka, Fatmir Agolli, Stavri Popa & Epison Pulaha v. State of Tennessee
M2000-02305-CCA-R9-CO
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steve R. Dozier

We granted the defendants’ application for interlocutory appeal, see Tenn. R. App. P. 9, to review the trial court’s disqualification of defense counsel based upon conflicting interests in counsel’s representation of all four defendants. Because we conclude that the lower court acted within its discretion in disqualifying counsel from multiple representation, we affirm.

Johnson vs. CCA
W2001-00595-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

State of Tennessee v. Cleander Cleon Hartman, Jr. - Concurring and Dissenting
M200-02441-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter

I fully concur in the majority’s opinion with the exception of its conclusion that the sentence in this case is unreasonable in light of the severity of the offenses. In any event, upon remand for a new trial, should the defendant again be convicted pursuant to counts one and three of the indictment, the trial court should be free to consider the imposition of consecutive sentencing in light of any additional evidence presented by the State.

State of Tennessee v. Cleander Cleon Hartman, Jr.
M2000-02441-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter

The defendant appeals from his convictions of aggravated sexual battery,  sexual battery by an authority figure, and sexual battery. We conclude that  the conviction for Count Two of sexual battery by an authority figure must be reversed and dismissed because stepparents as a matter of law are not included in the statute under which the defendant was indicted. Additionally, evidence of uncharged sex crimes was erroneously admitted and inappropriately argued resulting in undue prejudice to the defendant. The cumulative effect of these errors requires a new trial on Count One and Count Three.

In The Matter Of: S.G.S.
M2001-00649-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Clara W. Byrd
The trial court terminated the parental rights of the biological father on the ground of abandonment, and granted the adoption petition of the stepfather. The biological father argues on appeal that he did not abandon his child. We affirm the trial court.

State v. Tamberley Daniels
M2001-00624-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Samuel H. Smith
The non-custodial parent of two minor girls appeals the decision of the Juvenile Court of Hickman County terminating her parental rights on the grounds of willful abandonment. We affirm the action of the trial court.

Terry Hicks v. Donal Campbell
M2001-00280-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
This appeal involves a prisoner disciplinary proceeding at the Hardeman County Correctional Facility. A prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking judicial review of a prison disciplinary board's finding that he was guilty of "conspiracy to violate state law." Two of the seven respondents named in the petition filed a Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(6) motion to dismiss. The trial court granted the motion, and the prisoner perfected this appeal. We have determined that the appeal should be dismissed because the order being appealed from is not final and does not comply with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 58.

In the Matter of: D.D.V.
M2001-02282-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Barry Tatum
The State filed a petition to terminate parental rights to a four-year-old boy. Only the mother contested the action. The trial court granted the petition, terminating the mother's parental rights on multiple grounds, including abandonment and failure to comply with a plan of care. We reverse as to the mother, because we do not believe any of the grounds were proven against her by clear and convincing evidence, as is required by statute.

First Union National Bank v. Donald Abercrombie
M2001-01379-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Russell Heldman
This appeal involves a dispute stemming from a defaulted note. The lender filed suit against the purported borrower in the Chancery Court for Williamson County asserting that he was liable for $57,778.20. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that he was not personally liable on the note because he was simply an officer of the corporation named as the borrower on the note and because he was not a guarantor of the corporation's debts. Thereafter, the lender moved for a default judgment, and the purported borrower then filed an answer denying liability on the note and a counterclaim against the lender for compensatory and punitive damages. The trial court granted the lender a default judgment for $57,778.20 without addressing the pending motion to dismiss or the answer and counterclaim. We have determined that the trial court erred by granting the default judgment and, accordingly, reverse the judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.

Sears Roebuck vs. William Riley
W2001-01981-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Rita L. Stotts
This appeal arises from the filing of a civil warrant by the Appellee against the Appellant in the General Sessions Court of Shelby County. The Appellee alleged that the Appellant owed on an account in the amount of $3,345.56. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the Appellee. The Appellant appealed the judgment of the general sessions court to the Circuit Court of Shelby County. The Appellee filed a motion for summary judgment. At the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, the Appellant stated that he did not oppose the motion for summary judgment. The trial court entered an order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee. The Appellant appeals the order of the Circuit Court of Shelby County granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.

State of Tennessee v. Chad Davis
W2000-02752-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Fred Axley

The Appellant, Chad Davis, pled guilty in the Shelby County Criminal Court to DUI, second offense, and driving on a revoked license. At the sentencing hearing, Davis requested that he be permitted to serve on work release the imposed forty-five day mandatory jail sentence for DUI, second offense, and the consecutive two-day jail sentence for driving on a revoked license. The trial court found Davis was ineligible for work release because he was self-employed. Davis now appeals
this ruling. In response, the State asserts that the trial court was without authority under the provisions of the work release statute, Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-2-128, to grant work release to Davis or any other person convicted of DUI, second offense, prior to expiration of the minimum period of confinement. After review, we find the trial court’s ruling misplaced. Nonetheless, we conclude that Davis was not entitled to “work release,” as only the general sessions court has the authority to grant work release under the provisions of Tennessee Code Annotated § 41-2-128.

State of Tennessee v. Chad Davis - Order
W2000-02752-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
It appearing that the original opinion filed in this case on January 10, 2002, is in conflict with the recent holding of State v. Marcus Morrow, No. M1999-00769-SC-R11-CD (Tenn. Jan. 11, 2002). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the opinion filed on January 10, 2002, is withdrawn and replaced by the opinion filed on this day (Jan 16, 2002). For appeal time purposes, the judgment filed on January 10, 2002, shall be vacated and reentered as of the date of the refiling of this court's opinion.

Gregory L. Hollingsworth v. State of Tennessee
W2000-01993-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joe C. Morris

On May 3, 1999, the Defendant, Gregory L. Hollingsworth, pled guilty to aggravated assault, vehicular assault, driving after being declared an habitual motor vehicle offender, and two counts of criminal impersonation. The convictions were obtained in Madison County, Tennessee. The Defendant apparently did not appeal, but filed pro se for post-conviction relief in Carter County, Tennessee, where he was incarcerated. The trial court summarily dismissed the petition for improper venue. The Defendant refiled his petition on May 25, 2000, in Madison County, Tennessee. The trial court summarily dismissed the petition as barred by the one year statute of limitations. The Defendant now appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Eddie Medlock
W2000-03009-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph B. Dailey

The Appellant, Eddie Medlock, was convicted after a trial by jury of two counts of aggravated rape and two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, class A felonies. The Appellant, a Range III persistent offender, was sentenced to sixty years on each count. The Criminal Court of Shelby County ordered the rape counts to run concurrent, the kidnapping counts to run concurrent, and the rape and kidnapping counts to run consecutively to each other, for an effective one-hundred and twenty-year sentence. On appeal, Medlock argues that: (1) his multiple punishments for especially aggravated kidnapping and multiple punishments for aggravated rape violated double jeopardy principles; (2) his convictions for especially aggravated kidnapping violated due process principles of State v. Anthony; (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions; (4) the trial court failed to articulate its findings of applicable enhancing factors at sentencing; and (5) consecutive sentencing was improper. After review, we find Medlock's multiple convictions for especially aggravated kidnapping constitute double jeopardy. Accordingly, one count of especially aggravated kidnapping is reversed and dismissed; the sentences and convictions for the remaining two counts of aggravated rape and one count of especially aggravated kidnapping are affirmed.

State of Tennessee v. Mario Johnson
W2001-00898-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. C. Mclin

The Appellant, Mario Johnson, was convicted by a Shelby County jury for first-degree felony murder during the perpetration of a robbery and was sentenced to life imprisonment with parole. On appeal, Johnson argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the verdict. After review, we find no error and affirm the judgment of the Shelby County Criminal Court.

Michael Casby vs. Theresa Hazlerig
W2001-02073-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III
This appeal involves a custody and visitation dispute brought by divorced parents having joint custody of their two children. Following the submission of numerous filings by the parties, the court held a hearing to determine whether or not to alter the custody arrangement set out in the court's final decree. As a result of the hearing, the court issued an opinion and permanent parenting plan which altered the previous visitation agreement by naming the father primary custodial parent and granting the mother limited visitation rights. The court further ordered the mother to pay child support in accordance with the guidelines. The mother appealed and, for the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

Stacey J. Stanley v. Daniel Ring,
W2001-00950-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: William Michael Maloan

State of Tennessee v. Clifford Douglas Peele
E2001-02825-CCA-RM-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Arden L. Hill & Judge R. Jerry Beck

The defendant appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea proceedings. Initially, we dismissed his appeal. The supreme court granted the defendant's application to appeal and reversed the dismissal, remanding the matter to this Court for a determination of the merits of the appeal. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

03-98-005-CC
03-98-005-CC
Trial Court Judge: A. Andrew Jackson

Shepard Barbash vs. Monty Bruell & Anthony Smith
E2005-00387-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Howell N. Peoples

Mohammad D. Hussain v. Grange Mutual Casualty
M2001-00658-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
Homeowners, unsatisfied with repairs to their home following a fire, sued their insurance company, the contractor who performed repairs on their home, and another contractor who removed personal property for cleaning and repair. The homeowners settled their claims against the insurance company and, on the day of trial, voluntarily dismissed their claims against the contractor for cleaning of their personal property. The trial proceeded upon their claims against the contractor who repaired the fire damage in their home, and the trial court entered a judgment for $650.00 in favor of the homeowners. Because the appellate record includes no record of the evidence taken at trial, we must presume the trial court's findings were supported by the record. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Richard O'Leary, et ux. v. Ann Johnson, et al.
M2000-03110-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray
This case involves a payoff of a loan secured by a deed of trust on real estate and the failure to release the deed of trust on the record. In connection with a refinancing by the property owner, the title company closing agent issued a check to pay off the existing loan secured by a deed of trust. The check-payees, husband and wife, failed to negotiate the check and did not release the deed of trust. Some ten years later, after the death of the husband, the wife-payee found the check in her husband's files, and her attempt to negotiate the check failed because the account on which it was drawn was closed. She duly notified the title company closing agent, but it refused to reissue the check. Some three years later, the owners of the property tried again to refinance their loan, and in examining the title, it was discovered that the deed of trust, which presumably had been paid off, had not been released. The property owners filed suit against the title company closing agent and the holder of the note secured by the unreleased trust deed. The holder of the note filed a counter-claim against the property owners and a cross-claim against the title company closing agent. After a nonjury trial, the trial court awarded plaintiffs judgment against the title company closing agent for the amount of the payoff check issued to pay the previous loan and dismissed the cross-claim against the title company. The holder of the previous loan was awarded a judgment against the property owners for the amount of the principal balance due, plus attorney fees. The title company has appealed. We vacate in part, modify and affirm as modified.

Mallory Valley Utility District v. Jeffrey Cantwell, et al.
M2001-00627-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Russell Heldman
The Trial Court dismissed plaintiff's condemnation action on grounds that the taking was arbitrary and capricious. On appeal, we vacate and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Buster Chandler v. Don Sundquist
M2001-00274-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
A Kentucky prisoner filed suit in a Tennessee court, claiming that he was entitled to be pardoned so that he could stand trial for murder in this state. The trial court dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. We affirm.

In Re: William Harris Epps
M2001-01336-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano
The conservators and sons of Mr. Epps appeal the trial court's decision to award to Mr. Epps's wife one-third of the proceeds from the sale of a house owned by Mr. Epps but used as the marital residence during the marriage of over ten years. We affirm the decision of the trial court.