Holder, etc., vs. Celsor, et. al.
|
Trousdale | Court of Appeals | |
Lindsey vs. Lindsey
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Byrd vs. Byrd
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
United Citites Gas Co. vs. Suddarth
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. James Delbridge
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Edward Jones
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Maurice Teague
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. John Williams
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Scruggs vs. TR
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Spruell vs. Spruell
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Bowman v. A-best
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Bowman v. A-best
|
Court of Appeals | ||
James Jones, et al vs. Randall Harris, et al
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Steve/Lori Eldridge vs. City of Trenton, TN
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Creative vs. Bale
|
Campbell | Court of Appeals | |
State DHS vs. Rogoish
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Ravenwood vs. Franklin
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Tammy R. Ganzevoort vs. Richard B. Russell, Martha T. Russell, and Jim Cassetty d/b/a Jim Cassetty Realty - Concurring
This case presents for review the decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the trial court and dismissing an action for violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act1 brought by the purchaser of residential real property against the seller and the seller’s broker. The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the suit is affirmed. |
Sumner | Supreme Court | |
Ganzevoort vs. Russell
|
Supreme Court | ||
Steele , et. al. vs. Industrial Dev. Bd. of Metro Gov't.
|
Supreme Court | ||
Dept. of Health, Bureau of Medicaid vs. Jaco
|
Supreme Court | ||
Lamar Fletcher vs. State
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
Ira Antonio Tenpenny v. USAir
|
Davidson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Tammie S. Watson (Jamesvs. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., et al.
|
Lawrence | Workers Compensation Panel |