Estate of J.P. Walker vs. Dpt.of Revenue
03A01-9808-PB-00250

Sullivan vs. Baptist Memorial Hospital
02S01-9804-CV-00032

Sullivan vs. Baptist Memorial Hospital
02S01-9804-CV-00032

Wanda Barker vs. James Barker
02A01-9808-CH-00222
Trial Court Judge: William Michael Maloan

William Hall vs. Don Shaw
02A01-9810-CH-00288
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

State vs. Christopher D. Smith
03C01-9807-CR-00270
Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins

Gloria Rooker v. Zurich Insurance Co.
W1998-00273-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Special Judge C. Creed Mcginley
Trial Court Judge: Hon. D'Army Bailey
This worker's compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 50-6-225(e) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the defendant's insurer appeals the award of 25% disability to the body as a whole, as well as the court ordered payment of medical charges by a physician not authorized by the employer. After thorough review of the record, this panel finds the award of permanent partial disability should be affirmed, but that portion of the judgment ordering payment of medical expenses for charges by an unauthorized physician should be reversed.

Bobby White v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber
02S01-9810-CV-00101
Authoring Judge: C. Creed Mcginley, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. William B. Acree
This worker's compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Worker's Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann._ 50-6-22-255(e) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the defendant appeals the award of 55% disability to the body as a whole. After a thorough review of the record, this panel finds this award of permanent partial disability should be affirmed.

Doris Howard v. Sterling Plumbing Group, Inc.
02S01-9811-CH-00107
Authoring Judge: Hon. William Michael Maloan, Chancellor
Trial Court Judge: Hon. William Michael Maloan,
This workers' compensation appeal was referred to the Special W orkers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-225(e)(3) (Supp. 1998) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. This worker's compensation suit was brought by Doris Howard, widow of Paul Howard, deceased, for the use and benefit of herself and the two minor children of the plaintiff, and Paul Howard, deceased. The trial court found for the plaintiff, holding that her husband, Paul Howard, suffered a compensable heart attack arising out of and in the course of his employment for the defendant. The court held that the heart attack resulted in the death of Mr. Howard and awarded benefits accordingly. In its only issue, the defendant says that the plaintiff did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence "that the claimants heart attack was precipitated by physical activity or exertion or physical strain associated with claimant's job." After considering the record, we find that the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. Except for the medical evidence, there is no substantial conflict in the evidence. The plaintiff, the employee's widow, testified that Mr. Howard was 6'1" tall, 42 years of age, and weighed 168 pounds on October 1, 1995, when he died at work. He had high blood pressure and cholesterol. On October 1, 1995, the deceased left home to go to work at approximately 6:1 p.m. He was a maintenance employee for the defendant. Later, he telephoned his wife, and they had a normal conversation, Mr. Howard was in a good humor and laughing. He told his wife that at that time he was cleaning. Glen Page, testified that he worked in the maintenance department of the defendant corporation with Mr. Howard. They worked together on the evening of October 1, 1995. They weren't busy in the maintenance department, so they did some cleanup work involving sweeping. Mr. Howard was using a pushbroom that measured from 14 to 18 inches wide. Mr. Page testified that sweeping with the pushbroom was not strenuous work and that he and Mr. Howard could take a break when they desired. Mr. Page was called to the telephone and was gone for about twenty minutes. When he returned, Mr. Howard was lying on the floor. He had turned blue, and the pushbroom was on the floor two or three feet from him. Dr. Robert D. Dodds, II, a cardiologist, testified by deposition. On October 1, 1995, he was called in his capacity as the medical examiner for Obion County to observe Mr. 2

Willette Newsom v. Murray, Inc.
02S01-9811-CH-00110
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Joe C. Morris,
This workers' compensation appeal was referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) (Supp. 1998) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. This is a carpal tunnel syndrome case. Upon hearing the evidence, the trial court found that plaintiff suffered a 6 percent permanent partial disability to her right arm and a 35 percent permanent partial disability to her left arm. Defendant, Murray, Incorporated, appealed the judgment. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court's award is excessive. After careful review of the record, we find that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's award. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. At the time of trial, plaintiff, Willette Newsom, was a 5 year old mother of three with a Bachelor of Science degree in business education. However, her previous work experience did not involve the use of her degree but consisted of employment as a file clerk, a restaurant employee, in home health services, and as a nurse's assistant at a nursing home. She began working for Murray in 1993 on the assembly line. She was subsequently transferred to the parts and service department for approximately two and one half years before being put back on the assembly line. Her job duties on the assembly line included repetitious use of her hands while tightening screws into motors with a power gun. After a few months back on the assembly line, she experienced a sharp pain in her right hand, which she reported to her employer. She was sent to Dr. Bingham for treatment and eventually to Dr. Lowell F. Stonecipher when she did not improve. Plaintiff first saw Dr. Stonecipher, an orthopedic surgeon, on October 11, 1996, when Dr. Bingham's conservative treatment of plaintiff's moderately severe carpal tunnel syndrome was ineffective in relieving her symptoms. On November 13, 1996, Dr. Stonecipher performed an endoscopic carpal tunnel release on plaintiff's right hand. On November 26, plaintiff was released to light duty with restrictions on lifting more than twenty pounds. Because she was doing well in January, Dr. Stonecipher released plaintiff to regular duty on January 17, 1997, but advised her against the use of power tools. The 2

Willie Lane Shannon v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc., et al
02S01-9902-CH-00013
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. C. Creed Mcginley,
This workers' compensation appeal was referred to the Special W orkers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) (Supp. 1998) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The standard of review of factual issues in workers' compensation cases is de novo upon the record of the trial court with a presumption of correctness, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2) (1991 & Supp. 1998); Henson v. City of Lawrenceburg, 851 S.W.2d 89, 812 (Tenn. 1993). Under this standard, we are required to conduct an in-depth examination of the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.

Morefield vs. O'Brien Heating/Cooling
01A01-9807-CH-00385
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

GRE Insurance Group vs. Reed
01A01-9806-CH-00300
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

Graham, et al vs. Edmondson
01a01-9809-CH-00482
Trial Court Judge: Cornelia A. Clark

Long vs. Tri-Con Industries
01S01-9708-CV-00176

02A01-9802-CH-00035
02A01-9802-CH-00035
Trial Court Judge: William M. Maloan

Wiley Hutcherson vs. Rozell Carter
02A01-9807-CH-00216
Trial Court Judge: Wil V. Doran

State vs. Charles Smith
02C01-9805-CR-00128

State vs. Douglas Rains
02C01-9808-CC-00249

State vs. Douglas Rains
02C01-9808-CC-00249

State vs. Delfro Willis
02C01-9810-CC-00336

State vs. Christie Thomas
02C01-9810-CR-00303
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft

State of Tennessee vs. James Richard Watson
03C01-9809-CR-00325
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge R. Steven Bebb

The defendant, James Richard Watson, appeals from his sentence imposed for aggravated assault, a Class C felony, in the McMinn County Criminal Court. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-102(a)(1)(B) (1997). The trial court imposed a five year sentence in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this direct appeal, the defendant challenges the length of the sentence imposed and the manner of service. After a review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we affirm the sentence.

State of Tennessee vs. Anand Franklin
01C01-9807-CR-00282
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas H. Shriver

The appellant, Anand Franklin, was convicted by a Davidson County jury of one (1) count of aggravated sexual battery, a Class B felony. The trial court sentenced him as a Range I offender to eight (8) years incarceration. On appeal, the appellant claims that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. After a thorough review of the
record before this Court, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
 

State of Tennessee vs. David Eugene Smith, Jr.
01C01-9805-CR-00224
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Judge Seth W. Norman

The appellant, David E. Smith, Jr., appeals the verdict of a Davidson County jury finding him guilty of one count of theft of property over $1,000, a class D felony. For this offense, the appellant received a two year suspended sentence. On appeal, the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence and contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for judicial diversion.