Opinions

State of Tennessee v. Jefferson Pennington - Dissenting
01C01-9307-PB-00219
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Judge James R. Everett, Jr.

I dissent. I agree with the majority opinion that the twelve-hour detention without allowing bond under the policy stipulated by the parties to exist constituted punishment. In this respect, I believe that the policy would result in serious violations of an arrestee's statutory and constitutional rights, from illegal detention through illegal denial of bail into fundamental violation of due process. However, I do not believe that the Double Jeopardy Clause of either the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article I, Section 10 of the Tennessee Constitution is implicated in this case.

State of Tennessee v. Nathan Daniel Baiocco
01C01-9505-CC-00139
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joe B. Jones
Trial Court Judge: Judge Cornelia A. Clark

This Court granted the appellant's Rule 9 interlocutory appeal to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant's petition for the writ of certiorari to review the district attorney general's denial of pretrial diversion. The appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion. The state contends that the trial court properly affirmed the district attorney general's decision to deny pretrial diversion. Since this Court finds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

02C01-9411-CR-00257
02C01-9411-CR-00257

02C01-9410-CR-00219
02C01-9410-CR-00219

02C01-9503-CC-00058
02C01-9503-CC-00058
Trial Court Judge: Joe G. Riley. Jr.

02C01-9503-CC-00082
02C01-9503-CC-00082
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

02C01-9503-CC-00069
02C01-9503-CC-00069
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

02C01-9503-CC-00069
02C01-9503-CC-00069
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

02C01-9503-CC-00083
02C01-9503-CC-00083

Hon. Wil v. Doran
02C01-9503-CR-00079

And Our Supreme Court'S Opinion In State v. Adams, 864 S.W.2D 31 (Tenn. 1993), The
02C01-9506-CC-00178

02C01-9506-CC-00178
02C01-9506-CC-00178

I Agree With Judge Welles' Analysis In The Majority Opinion. State v. Adams,
02C01-9506-CC-00178

02C01-9505-CR-00121
02C01-9505-CR-00121

02C01-9505-CR-00121
02C01-9505-CR-00121

02C01-9505-CR-00143
02C01-9505-CR-00143
Trial Court Judge: Arthur T. Bennett

02C01-9505-CR-00144
02C01-9505-CR-00144

02C01-9507-CR-00186
02C01-9507-CR-00186

02C01-9507-CC-00180
02C01-9507-CC-00180

02C01-9507-CC-00195
02C01-9507-CC-00195

03C0l-9406-CR-002l3
03C0l-9406-CR-002l3

03C01-9505-CR-00137
03C01-9505-CR-00137
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX