State of Tennessee v. Jefferson Pennington - Dissenting
I dissent. I agree with the majority opinion that the twelve-hour detention without allowing bond under the policy stipulated by the parties to exist constituted punishment. In this respect, I believe that the policy would result in serious violations of an arrestee's statutory and constitutional rights, from illegal detention through illegal denial of bail into fundamental violation of due process. However, I do not believe that the Double Jeopardy Clause of either the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article I, Section 10 of the Tennessee Constitution is implicated in this case. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Nathan Daniel Baiocco
This Court granted the appellant's Rule 9 interlocutory appeal to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant's petition for the writ of certiorari to review the district attorney general's denial of pretrial diversion. The appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion. The state contends that the trial court properly affirmed the district attorney general's decision to deny pretrial diversion. Since this Court finds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. |
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9411-CR-00257
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9410-CR-00219
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00058
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00082
|
Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00069
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00069
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00083
|
Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Hon. Wil v. Doran
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
And Our Supreme Court'S Opinion In State v. Adams, 864 S.W.2D 31 (Tenn. 1993), The
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9506-CC-00178
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
I Agree With Judge Welles' Analysis In The Majority Opinion. State v. Adams,
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00121
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00121
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00143
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CR-00144
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9507-CR-00186
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9507-CC-00180
|
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9507-CC-00195
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C0l-9406-CR-002l3
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9505-CR-00137
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals |