Samson vs. Hartsville Hospital
|
Trousdale | Court of Appeals | |
Loria vs. Loria
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Livingston, et. al. vs. Upper Cumberland Human
|
DeKalb | Court of Appeals | |
Frank Rudy Heirs Assoc. vs. Moore & Assoc .
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02a01-9605-CH-00101
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9606-CH-00144
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
02C01-9605-CC-00144
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9603-CR-00109
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9604-CC-00132
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Relying In Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267 (Tenn. Crim.
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App.
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9512-CC-00382
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9511-CR-00353
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9603-CC-00087
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CR-00083
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CR-00061
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9512-CC-00415
|
Loudon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9609-CV-00289
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
03S01-9603-CC-00023
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9603-CV-00032
|
Supreme Court | ||
Terry Jamar Norris v. Tony Parker, Warden
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Lue Ann Smith, v. Winchester City Council, et. al.
This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Lue Ann Smith, from an order of the Franklin County Circuit Court quashing her writ of certiorari. The writ suspended the decisions of respondent/appellee, the Winchester City Council (“the Council”), allowing intervening petitioner, Karl Smith, permission and denying Appellant permission to sell fire works within the City of Winchester. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows. |
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
IN RE: Estate of Foster Hume, III; The University of the South v. Meredith Klank - Concurring
The University of the South, residuary legatee under the will of Foster Hume, deceased, has appealed from the judgment of the Probate Court holding that a specific devise to Meredith Klank was not extinguished by ademption and therefore the subject of the specific devise did not become a part of the residuary estate. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs William Eugene Hall, Jr., a/k/a Billy Hall, and Derrick Desmond Quintero
In this capital case, the appellants, William Eugene Hall and Derrick Desmond Quintero, were each convicted by a jury of two counts of murder during the perpetration of first-degree burglary, three counts of grand larceny, one count of petit larceny, and three counts of first-degree burglary. After a hearing, the jury sentenced each of the appellants to a life sentence for the murder of Buford Vester. As to the murder of Myrtle Vester, the jury found the following five aggravating factors: (1) the appellants were previously convicted of one or more felonies involving the use or threat of violence; (2) the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel in that it involved torture or depravity of mind; (3) the murder was committed for the purpose of avoiding, interfering with, or preventing a lawful arrest or prosecution of the appellants or another; (4) the murder was committed while the appellants were engaged in committing, or were accomplices in the commission of, or were attempting to commit, or were fleeing after committing or attempting to commit any first-degree murder, arson, rape, robbery, burglary, larceny, kidnapping, aircraft piracy, or unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb; and (5) the murder was committed by the appellants while they were in lawful custody or in a place of lawful confinement or during their escape from lawful custody or from a place of lawful confinement. See T.C.A. § 39-2-203(i)(2), (5), (6), (7), (8) (1982). The jury found that there were no mitigating circumstances sufficiently substantial to outweigh the aggravating circumstances and sentenced the appellants to death by electrocution for the murder of Mrs. Vester. |
Humphreys | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Depriest, Gates-Pate-McDaniel, Henry H Headden, Joel P. Morris, Maurice Pinson, Richard R. Standel, Jr., and W.O. Vaughan, Jr., v. 1717-19 West End Associates., et. al
The captioned plaintiffs have appealed from the summary dismissal of their various claims by the trial court. The various claims and defenses on appeal arose from a failed investment scheme, and are illustrated by the following issues presented by the parties: |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |