Someday Baby, Inc. vs. Entertainment Int'l.
01A01-9705-CH-00228
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Someday Baby, Inc. vs. Entertainment Int'l.
01A01-9705-CH-00228
Trial Court Judge: William C. Koch

Mitchell vs. Archibald & Metro. Gov't.
01A01-9706-CV-00264
Trial Court Judge: Michael Mondelli

Estis, et. al. vs. Kelley, et. al.
01A01-9709-CV-00513

Standard Fire Ins. vs. Chester-O-Donley & Assoc.
01A01-9508-CV-00382
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Sawyer vs. Girsham, et. al.
01A01-9604-CH-00176
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Besh vs. Coppick
01A01-9605-CH-00234
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

State vs. Tina Overstreet
01C01-9704-CR-00131
Trial Court Judge: Thomas H. Shriver

Williams vs. Comer
01A01-9701-CH-00008

State vs. Tommy Clinton
01C01-9608-CR-00381

Raymond Jackson vs. State
01C01-9608-CR-00368

01C01-9608-CR-00369
01C01-9608-CR-00369

Ricky Summers vs. State
01C01-9608-CR-00332

By Our Supreme Court'S Recent Opinion In State v. Roger Dale Hill, Sr., No. 01S01-9701-
01C01-9707-CR-00313

Monroe Brown vs. State
01C01-9607-CR-00305

State vs. Jerry Duffey
01C01-9610-CC-00427
Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker

State vs. Alton Waller
01C01-9611-CC-00479
Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris

State vs. Daniel Barnes
01C01-9702-CR-00070
Trial Court Judge: Thomas H. Shriver

Henley vs. State
01S01-9703-CC-00056
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond

State vs. Horne
03C01-9607-CR-00275
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner

Knight vs. State
03C01-9705-CR-00162
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

State vs. Harris
03C01-9704-CC-00134
Trial Court Judge: Ben W. Hooper, II

State vs. Sandell
03C01-9606-CC-00237

State vs. Shropshire
03C01-9612-CR-00454

James v. Peeler
01S01-9707-CV-00145
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. William B. Cain
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Supreme Court on May 17, 1996 affirmed a judgment for the plaintiff entered on September 22, 1994 whereby he was awarded benefits for (1) the loss of an eye, (2) temporary, total disability, and (3) "all medical expenses." Benefits for the loss of an eye were calculated to be $16,524., which was paid. Benefits for temporary, total disability were $6,616.8, which was paid. Medical treatment was provided by the Veterans' Administration, whose charges, proved at the trial, were $11,438.. On August 1, 1996, the plaintiff filed a petition for the Writ of Mandamus seeking the judicial coercion of the defendant to pay (1) interest on the benefits for permanent, total disability; (2) interest on the temporary, total benefits, and (3) payment of the medical expenses with accrued interest. The defendant filed a "Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus," alleging that the interest "has now been paid." With respect to the medical expenses, the defendant responded that on December 15, 1993, before the case was tried, it received a letter from the VA enclosing a statement for medical services provided to the plaintiff in the amount of $11,438.. Payment was requested by draft payable to the VA. After the case was concluded, the VA agreed to accept $7,625. in settlement of its claim for medical expenses. The trial court ruled that "the VA had a valid subrogation interest in the amount of $11,438. for medical benefits provided to the plaintiff and that the