State vs. John Stone
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gary W. Phelps vs. David Mills
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In Hicks v. State, 945 S.W.2D 706 (Tenn. 1997), The Supreme Court Held That
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Talley
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Majors vs. State
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darryl Bailey
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Bucy
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
J.C. Bradford vs. Southern Realty
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Rathal Perkins
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ronnie Graham
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Cliff
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. George Washington
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Walter Wilson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James R. Reynolds, v. Tennessee Board of Parole, et al.
This appeal involves an inmate’s challenge to the denial of his application for parole by the Tennessee Board of Paroles. After serving approximately ten years ofa 35-year sentence for aggravated rape, the inmate filed a petition for a common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County asserting that the Tennessee Board of Paroles was illegally and arbitrarily declining to honor his plea bargain agreement. The trial court dismissed the petition on the grounds that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and because it was not timely filed. The inmate has appealed pro se. We concur that the petition was not timely filed and affirm its dismissal in accordance with Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10(b).1 |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Beatty vs. McGraw et al
|
Fentress | Court of Appeals | |
Ricky Melvin vs State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeremy Amis
|
Humphreys | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9710-CC-00505
|
Houston | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Mark Higgins vs State
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Hancock et ux vs. U-Haul Co. of TN
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Perez
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9601-CC-00029
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cannon vs. State
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Martin R. Craddock vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Martin R. Craddock, appeals as of right from the Davidson County Criminal Court’s denial of habeas corpus relief. He is presently in the custody of the Department of Correction serving a Range I sentence of ten years for his conviction of aggravated sexual battery in 1995. He contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the judgment entered against him is void because the indictment for aggravated sexual battery fails to allege the mens rea for the offense. We affirm the dismissal of the petition. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Michael Brent Cook
The Defendant, Michael Brent Cook, appeals as of right from the revocation of his probation by the Sumner County Criminal Court. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his proba tion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals |