Barry Stokes and Pamela Stokes v. Torina Arnold
The Chancery Court for Dickson County terminated a mother’s parental rights to three young children and allowed the foster parents to proceed with the adoption of the children. Because we find that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence upon which to base the termination of the mother’s parental rights, we reverse. |
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Carl Scott and Alma Scott, v. Rogers Group, Inc.
This is a case involving breach of contract. Plaintiffs/appellants, Carl Scott and Alma Scott (referred to herein as “the Scotts”) appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendant/appellee, Rogers Group, Inc. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ferris E. Watson v. Lynn Rose Watson
This case involves a dispute over custody of two children upon their parents’ divorce. The trial court awarded custody to Lynn Rose Watson (“Mother”) with visitation to Ferris E. Watson (“Father”). Father appeals, claiming he is comparatively the better parent. We affirm the award of custody to Mother. |
Stewart | Court of Appeals | |
Rutherford Co. Bd. of Ed. vs. Rutherford Co. Comm.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Brown vs. Wal-Mart
|
Lawrence | Supreme Court | |
Gragg vs. Gragg
|
Supreme Court | ||
E1999-02098-C)A-R3-CV
|
Hawkins | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02550-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance vs. Brian Howard, et al
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Gregory James Harper vs. State
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Daniel
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Daniel
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Danny Spradlin
|
Blount | Supreme Court | |
03C01-9902-CC-00055
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William George Baltrip vs. Roy K. Norris, et al . Carolyn Turner vs. Monroe Farmers Cooperative
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jeffrey L. Lawson v. University of Tennessee
We granted this Rule 9, T.R.A.P., application to determine whether the defendant University of Tennessee (“the University”) can be sued for a violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. We find that it cannot be sued for such violations under the current state of the law. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the University’s motion to dismiss. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02516-COA-R9-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02518-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1998-00745-COA-R3-CV
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Ricky Lee Turner
|
Rhea | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Rhonda Pritchett V.Brewer, Krause & Brooks & American Mining Insurance Co .
|
Davidson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
00747-COA-R3-CV
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
01C01-9808-CR-00325
|
Overton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02525-COA-R3-CV
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Baker, et al vs. American Paper and Twine Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |