Mitch Grissim & Associates v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Tennessee
This appeal involves a suit by an attorney against a former client for attorney fees allegedly due when the client terminated contingency fee contracts. The trial court denied plaintiff-attorney's motion for partial summary judgment and granted defendant-client's motion for summary judgment, holding that the attorney was not entitled to recover fees for services provided to the client prior to discharge. Plaintiff has appealed. We reverse and remand. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Gabriel Dryden, et al. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
This case involves a traffic accident and the application of the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act. Plaintiff's vehicle was struck after Defendant failed to yield at an intersection. Defendant contended that the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Metro) was partially at fault for its failure to properly warn motorists of the upcoming intersection. After Plaintiff and Defendant settled their suit, Defendant pursued a claim against Metro. The trial court granted Metro's motion for summary judgment, ruling that Metro was entitled to governmental immunity. We vacate the trial court's award of summary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In The Matter Of: C.N.S. and C.J.S.
The trial court terminated the parental rights of the mother of two young children on multiple grounds, including the mother's inability to meet their special needs. The mother argued on appeal that the grounds for termination were not proven by clear and convincing evidence. We affirm the trial court. |
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Tracy Renee Morris v. Robert Andrew Morris
This case involves a petition to change custody. The parents were divorced in July 1998. By agreement, custody of the parties' two minor children was awarded to the mother. In February 2001, while the children were staying with the father at the mother's request, he filed a petition to modify custody to make him the permanent custodial parent. In his petition, the father alleged a material change in circumstances, in that the mother had difficulty keeping a job, maintaining a home, and taking care of the children. The trial court granted the father's petition. The mother now appeals. We affirm, finding that the trial court did not err in finding a material change in circumstances and did not abuse its discretion in changing custody to the father. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Beale St. Dev. vs. George Miller
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Roger Clayton Morris v. Lola Jane Morris
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Patsy Mitchell vs. Dr. James Ensor
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
General Construction vs. Greater St. Thomas Church
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Cavalier Metal vs. Johnson Controls
|
Henderson | Court of Appeals | |
Victoria Barnes vs. David Barnes
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
John David Neblett v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner originally pled guilty to aggravated vehicular homicide, vehicular assault, and second offense driving on a revoked license. The trial court sentenced him to an effective sentence of twenty-four years. The effective sentence was affirmed on direct appeal. The petitioner sought post-conviction relief, alleging an unknowing guilty plea and ineffective assistance of counsel. The post-conviction court denied relief. In this appeal, the petitioner contends the post-conviction court erred in summarily dismissing the petition based solely upon the guilty plea transcript. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Randal Wayne Faulk
The defendant was convicted by a Davidson County jury of driving under the influence, third offense, and driving on a revoked license. He appeals only his DUI conviction, arguing the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that he was under the influence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Michael A. Carter v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner originally pled guilty to aggravated robbery on June 1, 2000. He sought post-conviction relief alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel which led to an involuntary guilty plea. Following a hearing, the trial court dismissed the petition. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Corey Lamont Radley v. State of Tennessee
In this appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief, the sole issue is whether petitioner was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel in proceedings that led to his conviction for first degree murder with a resulting life sentence. We find no merit to his arguments and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jonathan Omar Echevarria
The Appellant, Jonathan Omar Echevarria, appeals from the sentencing decision of the Davidson County Criminal Court imposing a sentence of four years incarceration. The sentence arose from a guilty plea entered by Echevarria to one count of attempted aggravated robbery. In this appeal, Echevarria raises the issue of whether the trial court erred by ordering a sentence of total confinement rather than a less restrictive alternative. After review, we find no error. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v.Vasile Cavopol
Apparently serving probationary terms on judicial diversion, Vasile Cavopol attempts to appeal from the Davidson County Criminal Court. He claims (1) that the lower court should have dismissed the vandalism and resisting arrest cases against him when the state's witnesses did not appear for trial on two occasions and (2) that the evidence insufficiently supports the determinations of guilt. Because the defendant who was granted judicial diversion has no rightful appeal, we dismiss this appeal. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State v. Richard Hale Austin
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
State v. Richard Hale Austin
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Ronnie Watson
Convicted of aggravated robbery, Ronnie Watson appeals the Gibson County Circuit Court’s denial of his motion to suppress the statements he gave to a law enforcement officer shortly after the commission of the crime. We hold that the issue has been waived by Watson’s failure to include it in his motion for new trial. |
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Kevin Island
Kevin Island appeals from his Shelby County conviction of robbery. He claims that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We disagree and affirm. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Policy of Insurance No. Ltc982015 v. Transcarriers Inc.,
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Asata Lowe
A Blount County jury convicted the Defendant of two counts of first degree premeditated murder and imposed concurrent sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The jury also convicted the Defendant of especially aggravated robbery, and the trial court sentenced the Defendant to twenty-five years incarceration, to be served consecutive to the two sentences for first degree premeditated murder. The Defendant now appeals, raising the following issues: (1) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on all lesser-included offenses raised by the evidence, (2) whether the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on duress, necessity and accessory after the fact, (3) whether the trial court erred by allowing into evidence testimony regarding the Defendant's pending aggravated assault trial, (4) whether the trial court erred by allowing into evidence a magazine clip confiscated from the Defendant by police two months before the murders, (5) whether the trial court erred by refusing to find the sentencing provisions of the Tennessee homicide laws to be unconstitutional, (6) whether the Defendant's convictions for especially aggravated robbery and theft violated his right against double jeopardy, (7) whether the indictment was constitutionally defective on its face, and (8) whether there was sufficient evidence to convict the Defendant of the charged offenses. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, but remand for entry of a corrected judgment form in Count III of indictment number 11329. |
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Billy Joe Smith vs. Lisa Ricel
|
Johnson | Court of Appeals | |
Dept of Children's Srvcs, vs. TLC
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
E2002-00442-COA-R3-JV
|
Greene | Court of Appeals |