Cynthia Faye Davis v. Terry Reggie Davis
W2002-02998-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis

Gibson Court of Appeals

Estelle Frame vs. Kenneth Frame Jr.
W2002-00490-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Childers
This is a father's appeal of an order which, inter alia, increased a child support obligation based upon the finding of willful and voluntary unemployment. On mother's motion, the appeal is dismissed for failure to timely file a notice of appeal pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 4.

Shelby Court of Appeals

Stephanie Sansom v. Lookout Knitwear, Llc,
E2002-02226-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Roger E. Thayer, Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: Hon. W. Frank Brown III, Chancellor
The trial court awarded the employee 6 percent permanent partial disability to her left arm and found her shoulder injury to be compensable but no permanent injury. The judgment is affirmed as to the award of 6 percent disability to the arm and the allowance of temporary total disability benefits; the judgment is reversed as to the shoulder injury and the commutation of periodic benefits; and the judgment allowing reimbursement of medical expenses is modified.

Knox Workers Compensation Panel

Elbert M. Marable v. State of Tennessee
M2002-02122-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Judge James K. Clayton, Jr.

The Appellant, Elbert M. Marable, appeals the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief by the Rutherford County Circuit Court. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, Marable pled guilty to aggravated assault and was sentenced to three years in the Department of Correction as a Range I offender. On appeal, Marable presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether his plea was voluntarily and intelligently entered and (2) whether he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. After consideration of the entire record, we conclude that Marable's plea was not voluntarily and intelligently entered. Accordingly, his conviction for aggravated assault is vacated and this case is remanded to the trial court.

Rutherford Court of Criminal Appeals

Dept. Children Serv. vs. Ericka Everson
W2002-01085-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Charles V. Moore
This case involves the termination of parental rights. The two children lived with their single mother in Arkansas. The mother and children stayed temporarily with the children's grandfather in Arkansas, who sexually abused one of the children. After the grandfather threatened the mother, she and the children went to Tennessee and stayed with the children's grandmother. The mother went back to Arkansas and left the children with the grandmother in Tennessee. The grandmother repeatedly sought medical attention for one of the children. A physician determined that the child was a victim of Manchausen Syndrome by Proxy, a form of child abuse in which the caretaker exaggerates or secretly induces symptoms of illness in the victim and then seeks medical attention for the victim's "illness." Both children were taken into custody by the Tennessee Department of Children's Services. A permanency plan was designed for the children's mother. The mother failed to comply with the permanency plan, provide support for the children, or visit the children on a regular basis. In addition, she abducted the children from foster care and would not protect them from the abusive grandmother. The State filed a petition to terminate the mother's parental rights. The trial court granted the petition, and the mother appeals. We affirm, finding that termination of the mother's parental rights was warranted on several grounds and that termination was in the children's best interest.

Dyer Court of Appeals

W2002-02221-COA-R3-CV
W2002-02221-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby

Court of Appeals

Ursula Wimpee v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company
W2002-02795-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: John R. Mccarroll, Jr.

Shelby Court of Appeals

W2002-01945-COA-R3-CV
W2002-01945-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Walter L. Evans

Shelby Court of Appeals

Leslie M. Buchholz v. Tennessee Farmers Life
W2002-02989-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris

Madison Court of Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Latrece Jones
E2002-00893-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge Rebecca J. Stern

A jury found the defendant guilty of criminally negligent homicide. The trial court sentenced her as a mitigated offender to .9 years of unsupervised probation. The defendant appeals her conviction and alleges that the trial court erroneously allowed the improper admission of evidence regarding child restraint laws and insufficient evidence to support a conviction. After careful review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Hamilton Court of Criminal Appeals

Kassandra Greene vs. Tarry Greene
E2002-02611-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: L. Marie Williams
The Trial Court granted divorce, divided the marital assets, and assigned debts. The husband has appealed. We affirm.

Hamilton Court of Appeals

E2002-02809-COA-R3-CV
E2002-02809-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: John F. Weaver

Knox Court of Appeals

Marion Mitchell v. Patricia Mitchell
E2002-03030-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: William E. Lantrip
This is a post-divorce proceeding. Patricia Mitchell ("Wife") filed a petition seeking to modify the parties' previously-modified judgment of divorce. She alleged a change of circumstances and sought "an increased alimony award." Some 23 months later, and at a regularly scheduled hearing on the merits, the trial court denied Wife's motion for a continuance and dismissed her petition against Marion Mitchell ("Husband"). The trial court subsequently denied Wife's motion to reconsider. Wife appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in failing to grant her motion for continuance and in failing to reconsider that decision. We affirm.

Anderson Court of Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Glen Chandler
M2002-00207-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
The appellant, Glen Chandler, was convicted in a jury trial of the offenses of attempted first degree murder, attempted second degree murder, attempted voluntary manslaughter, and reckless endangerment. He was sentenced to an effective thirty-eight-years, eleven months and twenty-nine days sentence. In this appeal the appellant maintains the State failed to carry its burden of proof on the question of the appellant's sanity. He also argues that the trial court erred in failing to set aside the guilty verdict of attempted first degree murder because the proof established that the appellant was incapable of premeditation. After a review of the record and the applicable authorities we conclude that the State is not under any burden of proof with respect to the question of sanity in a criminal prosecution. We further find that the appellant has failed to establish that considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no reasonable trier of fact could have failed to find that the appellant’s insanity at the time of the offense was established by clear and convincing evidence. Finally, there is ample proof in the record from which any rational trier of fact could conclude that the appellant premeditated his attempt to kill Detective James Bentley. Thus, the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of attempted first degree murder.

Hickman Court of Criminal Appeals

W2002-02672-COA-R3-JV
W2002-02672-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Sam C. Nailling

Obion Court of Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Reginald Derell Baldon
W2002-01766-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph H. Walker, III

A Lauderdale County jury convicted the Defendant, Reginald Derell Baldon, of three counts of burglary, three counts of vandalism over $1,000, one count of theft over $1,000, one count of vandalism over $500, and four counts of misdemeanor theft stemming from three separate break-ins. He was sentenced to an effective term of twenty years. On appeal, the Defendant argues: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; (2) the State failed to provide proper discovery pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 16; (3) the trial court erred in denying a motion for mistrial due to the prosecutor’s reference to the Defendant’s failure to testify; and (4) the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on aggravated criminal trespass as a lesser-included offense of burglary. We also address whether lost evidence deprived the Defendant of a fair trial. We modify the judgment on one of the vandalism convictions to properly reflect the jury’s verdict, although this modification does not change the effective sentence of twenty years. Otherwise, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

Lauderdale Court of Criminal Appeals

Jason Reaves v. State of Tennessee
W2002-02540-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Arthur T. Bennett

The Defendant was convicted in general sessions court of Driving While Under the Influence and “Refusal to Submit.” He appealed his convictions and sentences to the Criminal Court for Shelby County. The Defendant failed to appear for his initial court hearing in criminal court, and a capias was issued for his arrest. The Defendant was arrested on the capias, posted bond, and subsequently appeared one hour late for a hearing in criminal court. The criminal court dismissed the appeal and remanded the case to general sessions court for the execution of the original judgments. This appeal ensued, in which the Defendant argues (and the State concedes) that the criminal court erred by dismissing the appeal and remanding the case to general sessions court. We agree and reverse the judgment of the criminal court.

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Guadalupe Steven Mendez
E2002-01826-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Lillie Ann Sells

The Defendant, Guadalupe Steven Mendez, was convicted by a jury of aggravated rape and especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to terms of twenty-four years for the aggravated rape and ten years for the sexual exploitation. These sentences were ordered to be served concurrently to each other but consecutively to a prior sentence. In this direct appeal, the Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in support of the aggravated rape conviction, and further complains that his sentence is excessive. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

Cumberland Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Charles Wade Smith, III
M2001-01740-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald P. Harris

The defendant, Charles Wade Smith, III, was convicted by a Perry County jury of second degree murder for the shooting death of his father. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a violent offender to seventeen years of incarceration. The defendant now appeals contending that: (1) he was deprived of the opportunity to present exculpatory evidence; (2) the trial court erred in not giving a jury instruction regarding the relevance of the Defendant's intoxication to negate his culpable mental state; and (3) the evidence presented is insufficient to support his conviction. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Perry Court of Criminal Appeals

Ronald Jerome Butler v. State of Tennessee
M2002-01870-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Judge Seth W. Norman

The petitioner, Ronald Jerome Butler, filed a petition for post-conviction relief in the Davidson County Criminal Court, alleging that he received the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The post-conviction court denied the petition, and the petitioner contests this ruling on appeal. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Barry L. Armistead
M2002-01877-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Seth W. Norman

Barry L. Armistead appeals from the Davidson County Criminal Court's revocation of his probationary sentences. He claims that the lower court erred in revoking probation because the state failed to prove a violation by a preponderance of the evidence. Because we disagree, we affirm the lower court's judgment.

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

Donald Mitchell Green v. State of Tennessee
E2002-02517-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Judge Mary Beth Leibowitz

The petitioner, Donald Mitchell Green, pled guilty in the Knox County Criminal Court to aggravated robbery, failure to appear, and theft. Subsequently, the petitioner filed for post-conviction relief, alleging that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel. After a hearing, the post-conviction court denied the petition and the petitioner appealed. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

Knox Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Doris M. Dennison
E2003-01101-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Judge E. Shayne Sexton

The defendant, Doris M. Dennison, pled guilty in the Union County Criminal Court to five counts of aggravated sexual battery, a Class B felony. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the defendant received an eight-year sentence for each conviction with the issue of concurrent or consecutive sentencing to be determined by the trial court. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered that the defendant serve counts one through four consecutively to each other but concurrently with count five for an effective sentence of thirty-two years in the Department of Correction. The defendant appeals, claiming that the trial court improperly ordered consecutive sentences. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

Union Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. William E. McCarver
M2002-00123-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge Buddy D. Perry

The defendant was convicted by a Sequatchie County Circuit Court jury of first degree premeditated murder for shooting his wife's boyfriend to death outside a gasoline station and convenience store. Because the State did not seek either the death penalty or life without parole, the trial court automatically sentenced him to life imprisonment in the Department of Correction. In this appeal as of right, the defendant raises essentially three issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction; (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence enhanced versions of the store surveillance videotape of the shooting; and (3) whether the trial court erred in its jury instructions on intentionally and knowingly. Following our review, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the defendant's conviction for premeditated murder, the trial court did not err in admitting the videotapes, and any deficiency in the jury instructions constituted harmless error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Sequatchie Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. Rex A. Gibson
E2002-01533-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Rex Henry Ogle

A Sevier County jury convicted the Defendant of driving under the influence and failure to carry a driver's license. The trial court sentenced him to ninety days of incarceration, followed by supervised probation, and suspended his license for two years. He now appeals, claiming: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to suppress all evidence gained as a result of his traffic stop; and (2) that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence the results of his breathalyzer test. In the event that this Court finds that either the traffic stop was unconstitutional or the breathalyzer test was inadmissable, then, the Defendant contends, the remaining evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Sevier Court of Criminal Appeals