This appeal involves the purchase of property at a tax sale. MERS filed suit against Purchaser to invalidate his purchase of property because it had not received notice of the sale even though it was listed as a beneficiary or nominee on the deed of trust. Purchaser claimed that MERS was not entitled to notice because MERS did not have an interest in the property. Purchaser also alleged that MERS failed to properly commence its lawsuit because it did not remit the proper funds pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-2504(c). The trial court refused to set aside the tax sale, holding that the applicable notice requirements were met and that Purchaser was the holder of legal title to the property. MERS appeals. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Case Number
E2012-02292-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor W. Frank Brown, III
Case Name
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Carlton J. Ditto, et al
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
dittoopn.pdf100.15 KB