Scott M. Shultsz v. Baneberry Golf Course

This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employer, Baneberry Golf Course, and insurance carrier, U.S.F.&G. Company, have appealed from a judgment entered by the trial court awarding the employee, Scott M. Shultz, 5% permanent partial disability benefits to the body as a whole. The appeal presents issues concerning whether the court was in error in (1) awarding 5% disability, (2) exceeding the 2 _ multiplier provisions set forth in T.C.A. _ 5-6-241, (3) awarding certain unauthorized medical expenses and (4) awarding certain discretionary costs. Plaintiff was 32 years of age and left school before completing the 12th grade. He does not have a G.E.D. certificate and his work experience has been in the construction industry where he has been a general laborer. He was employed by the defendant golf course as a maintenance worker which required him to operate a large mower and a weedeater about the golf course. On August 23, 1995 while mowing, he noticed the mower deck had jumped its track. He stopped the tractor and squatted down to lift the deck up. As he lifted, he felt a sharp pain in his back and fell to the ground. A co-worker saw him and helped get him back to the shop and on to the hospital emergency room. He testified he worked some period of time after the accident although it was painful; that he was laid off in October or November due to the seasonable nature of his work; that he was furnished a list of physicians and went to see Dr. Kevin Bailey during October, 1995. The record indicates Dr. Bailey ordered an M.R.I. examination and the report showed a large central and right ruptured disc at the lowest disc level and a smaller herniation at the level above that. Dr. Bailey, a physical medicine specialist, did not believe surgery was necessary but referred him to Dr. Bishop, an orthopedic surgeon practicing in the same group, for a second opinion. Dr. Bailey gave a 7% medical impairment for his condition. Dr. Bishop recommended surgery and this was performed during March 1996. Plaintiff was eventually released to return to work on 2