SUPREME COURT OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Dispositive Order?

Sort by

Order

Wanda Cruise v. City of Columbia - Concurring 01S01-9508-CV-00132 Authoring Judge: Justice Penny J. White Trial Court Judge: Judge Joe C. Loser In this property confiscation case, the Court must decide whether a direct appeal was timely and whether the Governmental Tort Liability Act's1 twelve-month statute of limitations set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated Section 29-20-305(b) applies to bar plaintiff's claim for damage to and loss of personal property seized by police officers employed by defendant, the City of Columbia. For the reasons explained below, we hold that the appeal was timely and that plaintiff's claim is controlled by the three-year statute of limitations contained in Tennessee Code Annotated Section 28-3-105 and is, therefore, not barred.	Maury	Supreme Court	05/06/96
03S01-9503-CH-00027 03S01-9503-CH-00027		Supreme Court	04/29/96
03S01-9502-CV-00014 03S01-9502-CV-00014 Trial Court Judge: Dale C. Workman	Knox	Supreme Court	04/29/96
01S01-9503-CH-00045 01S01-9503-CH-00045 Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt	Davidson	Supreme Court	04/29/96
02S01-9504-CR-00029 02S01-9504-CR-00029 Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Mccartie	Shelby	Supreme Court	04/29/96
01S01-9505-CH-00083 01S01-9505-CH-00083		Supreme Court	04/22/96
Gene v. Aaby, 03S01-9507-CH-00073		Supreme Court	04/22/96
Gene v. Aaby, 03S01-9507-CH-00073		Supreme Court	04/22/96
01S01-9508-CH-00138 01S01-9508-CH-00138 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.		Supreme Court	04/22/96
01S01-9504-CV-00047 01S01-9504-CV-00047		Supreme Court	04/22/96
02S01-9410-CR-00071 02S01-9410-CR-00071	Shelby	Supreme Court	04/15/96
In Re: Estate of Mary T. Austin, Deceased, Elizabeth T. Austin, v .Christy N. Austin and Robert C. Austin C., Jr. 03S01-9410-PB-00092 Authoring Judge: Justice Lyle Reid Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Dennis H. Inman This case presents for review the decision of the probate court, affimred by the Court of Appeals, that the personal representative in this case may, in his discretion, distribute certain corporate stock in kind rather than sell the stock and distribute the proceeds. The decision miscontrues applicable law and is reversed.	Knox	Supreme Court	04/08/96
03S01-9505-CH-00060 03S01-9505-CH-00060		Supreme Court	03/25/96
03S01-9505-CV-00047 03S01-9505-CV-00047		Supreme Court	03/25/96
02S01-9502-CR-00019 02S01-9502-CR-00019 Trial Court Judge: H. T. Lockard	Shelby	Supreme Court	03/25/96
02S01-9505-CV-00036 02S01-9505-CV-00036 Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown		Supreme Court	03/25/96
01S01-9303-CC-00052 01S01-9303-CC-00052		Supreme Court	03/11/96
01S01-9303-CC-00052 01S01-9303-CC-00052		Supreme Court	03/11/96
03S01-9502-CH-00017 03S01-9502-CH-00017		Supreme Court	03/11/96
02S01-9502-CV-00015 02S01-9502-CV-00015		Supreme Court	02/26/96
01S01-9411-CR-00138 01S01-9411-CR-00138		Supreme Court	02/26/96
02S01-9501-CV-00008 02S01-9501-CV-00008 Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris		Supreme Court	02/26/96
02S01-9502-CV-00015 02S01-9502-CV-00015 Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley		Supreme Court	02/26/96
02S01-9505-CC-00044 02S01-9505-CC-00044 Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon		Supreme Court	02/20/96
01S01-9402-CV-00149 01S01-9402-CV-00149 Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Burch		Supreme Court	02/14/96