Can Do, Inc. Pension and Profit Sharing Plan and Successor Plans, Indiv. and as a Trustee for Georgoe W. Holder, Jr., v, Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh& Smith, C. Kinian Cosner, Jr. and H. Rowan Leathers, III
This case presents a question of first impression in Tennessee: whether or not a legal malpractice claim is assignable. We have determined that soundpublic policy reasons militate against allowing assignment of legal malpractice actions. We, therefore, reverse the Court of Appeals and dismiss the complaint. |
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennesse v. Terry Wood -Dissenting
I concur in the dissent of Justice White. |
Williamson | Supreme Court | |
Wanda Cruise v. City of Columbia - Concurring
In this property confiscation case, the Court must decide whether a direct appeal was timely and whether the Governmental Tort Liability Act's1 twelve-month statute of limitations set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated Section 29-20-305(b) applies to bar plaintiff's claim for damage to and loss of personal property seized by police officers employed by defendant, the City of Columbia. For the reasons explained below, we hold that the appeal was timely and that plaintiff's claim is controlled by the three-year statute of limitations contained in Tennessee Code Annotated Section 28-3-105 and is, therefore, not barred. |
Maury | Supreme Court | |
03S01-9503-CH-00027
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9502-CV-00014
|
Knox | Supreme Court | |
01S01-9503-CH-00045
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
02S01-9504-CR-00029
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
01S01-9505-CH-00083
|
Supreme Court | ||
Gene v. Aaby,
|
Supreme Court | ||
Gene v. Aaby,
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9508-CH-00138
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9504-CV-00047
|
Supreme Court | ||
02S01-9410-CR-00071
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
In Re: Estate of Mary T. Austin, Deceased, Elizabeth T. Austin, v .Christy N. Austin and Robert C. Austin C., Jr.
This case presents for review the decision of the probate court, affimred by the Court of Appeals, that the personal representative in this case may, in his discretion, distribute certain corporate stock in kind rather than sell the stock and distribute the proceeds. The decision miscontrues applicable law and is reversed. |
Knox | Supreme Court | |
03S01-9505-CH-00060
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9505-CV-00047
|
Supreme Court | ||
02S01-9502-CR-00019
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
02S01-9505-CV-00036
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9303-CC-00052
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9303-CC-00052
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9502-CH-00017
|
Supreme Court | ||
02S01-9502-CV-00015
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9411-CR-00138
|
Supreme Court | ||
02S01-9501-CV-00008
|
Supreme Court | ||
02S01-9502-CV-00015
|
Supreme Court |