State of Tennessee v. Nicole L. Lindholm
The Defendant, Nicole L. Lindholm, appeals the trial court’s imposition of an effective five-year sentence in the Tennessee Department of Correction for her convictions for aggravated assault, a Class C felony, and reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, a Class E felony, which followed the trial court’s revocation of her probationary sentence on judicial diversion. The Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court imposed an excessive sentence and erred by denying her request for probation. Based on our review, we affirm the sentence imposed by the trial court. |
Wayne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jamaal Mondrew Mayes
The Appellant appeals his convictions of second degree murder and possession of a firearm |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Deonta Baskin
The Defendant, Deonta Baskin, was convicted of first degree murder and possession of a |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Lance T. Sandifer
The Defendant, Lance T. Sandifer, appeals the trial court’s summary dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. In his motion, the Defendant argued that his sentences were illegal because he was not granted a juvenile transfer hearing and that the criminal court, therefore, lacked subject matter jurisdiction over him. Following our review, we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Willie Nathan Jones v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Willie Nathan Jones, appeals from the Putnam County Criminal Court’s denying his petition for post-conviction relief, which petition challenged his convictions of second degree murder and attempted second degree murder. Petitioner argues trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to contemporaneously object to the prosecutor’s closing argument and failing to object to the prosecutor’s use of the term “victim” when referring to a State’s witness. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jimmy Dewayne Richards
Defendant, Jimmy Dewayne Richards, was convicted by a Fentress County jury of burglary, theft of property, and vandalism. On appeal, the Defendant argues, among other things, that the trial court erred by denying the Defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress. We cannot adequately review on the record before us whether the search was supported by probable cause or whether Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search. The trial court sua sponte raised the standing issue after all the proof was presented at the hearing and did not comply with its duties to judge the credibility of witnesses, to weigh the evidence, and to resolve factual issues in deciding the motion to suppress. We therefore remand this case for a new hearing on the motion to suppress in accordance with the instructions in this opinion. |
Fentress | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Quintavious Montez Patton v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Quintavious Montez Patton, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he received effective assistance of trial counsel. Based on our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court denying the petition. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Courtney Anderson v. State of Tennessee
This is a State appeal, filed by the State Attorney General and Reporter, from the entry of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Frederick Peat
A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant, Frederick Peat, of aggravated rape, for |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Juan De Paz Mondragon
The defendant, Juan De Paz Mondragon, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eric Dewayne Milton
The defendant, Eric Dewayne Milton, appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his |
Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Chauncy Black
The defendant, Chauncy Black, was found guilty by a Shelby County jury of reckless |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Taylor Brent Farley
Defendant, Taylor Brent Farley, pleaded guilty to one count of attempted delivery of fentanyl, a Class C felony. Defendant sought judicial diversion, but the trial court denied diversion and imposed a six-year sentence on Community Corrections. On appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred by denying judicial diversion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sequatchie | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Edward Dean v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Edward Dean, appeals the denial of his post-conviction petition, arguing |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Will Vaughn
The defendant, Will Vaughn, appeals his Shelby County Criminal Court jury conviction of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Cedric D. Marshall, alias Edward Depriest
The defendant, Cedric D. Marshall, appeals the Davidson County Criminal Court’s order revoking his community corrections sentence and resentencing him to an effective sentence of seven years’ incarceration for his guilty-pleaded convictions of evading arrest, burglary, and theft of property. Because the defendant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Lorie Ann Gerbis
The Defendant, Lorie Ann Gerbis, was convicted following a bench trial of two counts of aggravated assault. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions. Specifically, she contends that the State’s evidence was inadequate to establish her identity as the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt. After review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Victericka Gilchrease v. State of Tennessee
The Pettioner, Victercika Gilchrease, appeals from the post-conviction court’s denial of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Mark L. Ward
The Appellant, Mark L. Ward, was convicted by a Knox County jury of aggravated |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Micah Joshua Ford, Alias Joseph Tolbert, III v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Micah Joshua Ford, alias Joseph Tolbert, III, appeals the denial of his postconviction |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Bradley Dwight Bowen
The Defendant, Bradley Dwight Bowen, appeals from his jury convictions for possession of one-half gram or more of methamphetamine with intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver; simple possession of cocaine; possession of drug paraphernalia; and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; for which he received an effective ten-year sentence. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s denial of (1) his motion to suppress the evidence seized as a result of his detention and (2) his motion to continue requesting additional time to prepare his pro se defense. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Gregory L. Nelson
The Defendant, Gregory L. Nelson, appeals the trial court’s revocation of his eight-year sentence for unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by fully revoking his probation and ordering him to serve the remainder of his sentence in confinement. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Notaro
Michael Notaro, Defendant, pled guilty to three counts of sexual exploitation of a minor |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Kirk Stack
The Defendant, Christopher Kirk Stack, appeals from the Knox County Criminal Court’s |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee v. Alain Benitez
The Defendant, Alain Benitez, appeals the Smith County Criminal Court’s imposition of consecutive sentencing for his two convictions of first degree felony murder. Upon review, we conclude that we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. |
Smith | Court of Criminal Appeals |