State of Tennessee v. Christopher Kirkendall - Concurring

Case Number
W2003-02393-CCA-R3-CD

I agree that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and that, under the terms of the 1989 Sentencing Act, the trial court erred by applying enhancement factors (10), (11), and (17).  It is my view, however, that the ruling in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. ___, 124 S. Ct. 2531 2004), precludes the application of enhancement factor (21) in this case.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge
Judge W. Fred Axley
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Kirkendall - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
KirkendC.pdf16.95 KB