Eric Wright v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting

Case Number
W2001-00386-CCA-R3-PC

I respectfully dissent. Based upon the record before us, I believe that the trial court was justified in dismissing the petition without an evidentiary hearing. I do not believe that our supreme court intended in Williams v. State, 44 S.W.3d 464, 471 (Tenn. 2001), to provide a hearing for people in the petitioner’s situation. In Williams, the record indicated that Williams’ attorney’s actions may have led Williams to believe that supreme court review was timely sought, thereby potentially misleading him about when the statute of limitations would run.

Authoring Judge
Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge
Judge Joseph B. Dailey
Case Name
Eric Wright v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version