Tarkington vs. Tarkington
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Landry, Jr. vs. Rudd
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Curtis Landry, Jr., D/B/A Landry and Associates, v. John Daniel Rudd
The defendant, John Daniel Rudd, has appealed from a judgment of the Trial Court allowing the enrollment of two foreign judgments, both in favor of the plaintiff, John Landry and against the defendant. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Landry, Jr. vs. Rudd
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Devore vs. Deloitte & Touche
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. David Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn
Order on Petition To Rehear Upon consideration of the petition to rehear filed by the appellants Davey Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn, this Court is of the opinion that the petition should be and the same is hereby denied. |
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9707-CV-00152
|
Lake | Court of Appeals | |
Joseph Nolen v. Amy Nolen
|
Hickman | Court of Appeals | |
Child Support Svcs. vs. Russell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sanders, et. ux. vs. Mansfield, et. al.
|
Lincoln | Court of Appeals | |
West vs. Dept. of Correction, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sherrell vs. Sherrell
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Little, et. al. vs. Hogan, et. al.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Carson vs. Agri-Products Special Markets
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Culp vs. J.B. Hinson & Pevahouse
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Hollis vs. Hollis
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Karr vs. Gibson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Martin vs. Union Planters
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Mildred Daniel vs. James Daniel
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
McGlothlin vs. Bristol
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Knoll vs. Knoll
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Stephens vs. Revco
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Worley vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Cheri Owens Tuncay v. Engin Halif Tuncay - Concurring
This is a divorce case. Plaintiff-appellant Cheri Owens Tuncay was granted a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. Mrs. Tuncay appeals the trial court’s division of the marital debts as well as the court’s failure to award her alimony beyond $5,000 in attorney fees. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Donald Neil Pierce, v. Branda Ann Radford Pierce
This is a divorce case. On appeal, Brenda Pierce (wife) raises the issues of whether the tril court erred by refusing to grant her periodic alimony, by failing to grant her the divorce, and by failing to grant her discretionary costs and attorney's fees. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified. |
Roane | Court of Appeals |
