O.W. Winsett v. Paul Orr and Mary Orr
This case involves the alleged breach of an oral contract for the construction of a home. The trial court granted the builder summary judgment. Because some genuine issues of material fact exist, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Mississippi Farm Mutual vs. Latonia & Thomas Jones
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Susie Buchanan vs. Memphis Light, etc.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Harris Hughes Jr. vs. TN Seeds, et al
|
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
Kitsie Hendrix vs. James Cox, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
William Boyle vs. Virginia Thomas
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Wolf vs. The University of TN.
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Nelson vs. The Application Group
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Nelson vs. The Application Group
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Fetterolf vs. Fetterolf
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee Department of Human Services, v. Sylvia Fetterolf Ford, and Stanley Fetterolf
This is an appeal by respondents/appellants, Stanley Fetterolf and Sylvia Fetterolf Ford, from a decision of the Putnam County Juvenile Court terminating their parental rights. Ms. Ford argues petitioner/appellee, State of Tennessee Department of Human Services (“Department”), filed its petition for termination of parental rights in the wrong court and contends the proper venue was the Overton County Juvenile Court which had handled the initial custody proceedings.1 The pertinent facts are as follows. |
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
American Color vs. Innovo
|
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
American Color vs. Innovo
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Holloway vs. Collier, Jr.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Holloway vs. Collier, Jr.
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas v. White
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Jones vs. Rudolph
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9704-CV-00111
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Jefferson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Morgan | Court of Appeals | |
Raymond Morris vs. Voil Morris
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Jewell Maness vs. Estate of Acie Maness
|
Henderson | Court of Appeals | |
Lasalle Dudley vs. Raye Dudley
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Franklin Thomas Burns v. Bernice A. Burns - Concurring
This is an appeal by respondent/appellant, Bernice A. Burns (“Wife”), from the order of the trial court granting Wife and petitioner/appellee, Franklin Thomas Burns (“Husband”), a divorce, dividing the marital property, and granting temporary alimony. Wife complains the court erred when it divided the parties’ property and awarded Wife $400.00 alimony per month for six months. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows. |
Montgomery | Court of Appeals |