COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Northcott vs. TDOC
M1999-01223-COA-R3-CV

Davidson Court of Appeals

03A01-9810-CH-00320
03A01-9810-CH-00320

Hamilton Court of Appeals

03A01-9812-CH-00415
03A01-9812-CH-00415

Court of Appeals

03A01-9902-CH-00044
03A01-9902-CH-00044

Cocke Court of Appeals

03A01-9902-CH-00041
03A01-9902-CH-00041

Hamilton Court of Appeals

03A01-9901-CH-00070
03A01-9901-CH-00070

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

03A01-9903-CV-00112
03A01-9903-CV-00112

Blount Court of Appeals

03A01-9901-CH-00025
03A01-9901-CH-00025

Scott Court of Appeals

03A01-9901-CH-00019
03A01-9901-CH-00019

Court of Appeals

03A01-9903-CV-00112
03A01-9903-CV-00112

Blount Court of Appeals

Ralph & Linda Moore, et al vs. Dannie Christmas
03A01-9903-CV-00118

Roane Court of Appeals

03A01-9903-CV-00069
03A01-9903-CV-00069

Washington Court of Appeals

03A01-9812-CV-00424
03A01-9812-CV-00424

Anderson Court of Appeals

Johnny v. Dunaway of Lafollette For Appellant
03A01-9904-CH-00158

Union Court of Appeals

03A01-9906-CH-00225
03A01-9906-CH-00225

Court of Appeals

03A01-9903-JV-00091
03A01-9903-JV-00091

Knox Court of Appeals

03A01-9812-CV-00394
03A01-9812-CV-00394

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Hon. Frank v. Williams, Iii
03A01-9902-CH-00072

Morgan Court of Appeals

03A01-9905-CV-00187
03A01-9905-CV-00187

Court of Appeals

03A01-9812-CV-00423
03A01-9812-CV-00423

Sullivan Court of Appeals

Civil Cases". See Memphis Board of Realtors v. Cohen, 786 S.W.2D 951 (Tenn. App.
03A01-9906-CV-00229

Court of Appeals

03A01-9906-CV-00229
03A01-9906-CV-00229

Scott Court of Appeals

03A01-9905-CH-00160
03A01-9905-CH-00160

Court of Appeals

Johnny D. Young, v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
03A01-9812-CV-00414
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Neil Thomas, III

This is an appeal from the Trial Court’s denial of a Motion for New Trial filed by Plaintiff/Appellant, Johnny D. Young. The motion was based upon allegations of a quotient verdict, improper admission of evidence, and improper argument by counsel for Defendant/Appellee, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Although Plaintiff prevailed in his Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) action against Defendant, Plaintiff alleged five grounds in a Motion for New Trial, attaching as exhibits affidavits of five jurors, a court officer and Plaintiff’s trial counsel. Defendant responded with contradictory affidavits from four jurors. By entry of a Memorandum and Order, the Trial Court denied four of the grounds for new trial asserted by Plaintiff, and reserved final ruling on the issue of quotient verdict pending testimony by the jurors to resolve the contradictory statements in the affidavits filed by the parties. A hearing was held during which

Hamilton Court of Appeals