COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Anne Adams Hurdle, by and through her Attorneys-in-Fact, Walker Hardy Hurdle, III and William F. Hurdle, and Walker Hardy Hurdle, III and William F. Hurdle, Individually, v. William W. Dunlap, Jr and Wife, Mary Ann Hurdle 02A01-9502-CV-00023 Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert A. Lanier This matter appears appropriate for consideration pursuant to Rule 10(a) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	06/04/96
Michelle Lynn Durham and husband, Robert Wayne Durham, v. Luther Well an wife, Sue Well, individually and D/B/A Webb's British Petroleum Station and W. Paul Arnold, individually and D/B/A Arnold Construction Co. 02A01-9502-CV-00033 Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Hewitt P. Tomlin Trial Court Judge: Judge Dick Jerman, Jr. Michelle Lynn Durham and Robert Wayne Durham (“plaintiffs” or by name)1 brought this suit in the Circuit Court of Gibson, County against Luther Webb and wife Sue Webb, individually and d/b/a Webb’s British Petroleum Station (“defendants”),2 seeking damages for defendant’s alleged negligence that caused plaintiff Michelle Durham to fall in defendant’s parking lot, causing injuries. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, from which this appeal is taken. The sole issue presented is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We find no error and affirm.	Gibson	Court of Appeals	06/03/96
Lillian D. Vega-Horta, et al., v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, et al. 03A01-9706-CV-00226 Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers Trial Court Judge: Judge Dale C. Workman Plaintiff, Lillian Vega-Horta (“plaintiff”), appeals the judgment of the trial court granting defendant’s, St. Mary’s Medical Center (“St. Mary’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. For reasons state hereinafter, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.	Knox	Court of Appeals	06/01/96
Vicky v. Klein 01A01-9601-CV-00043 Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/31/96
01A01-9512-CH-00562 01A01-9512-CH-00562 Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.	Warren	Court of Appeals	05/31/96
01A01-9505-CH-00218 01A01-9505-CH-00218 Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt		Court of Appeals	05/31/96
02A01-9410-CH-00232 02A01-9410-CH-00232 Trial Court Judge: J. Steven Stafford	Dyer	Court of Appeals	05/31/96
02A01-9411-CV-00255 02A01-9411-CV-00255 Trial Court Judge: Janice M. Holder	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/31/96
02A01-9412-CV-00269 02A01-9412-CV-00269 Trial Court Judge: Phil B. Harris	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/31/96
02A01-9412-CV-00269 02A01-9412-CV-00269 Trial Court Judge: Phil B. Harris	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/31/96
03A01-9512-CV-00448 03A01-9512-CV-00448 Trial Court Judge: Inman		Court of Appeals	05/30/96
03A01-9601-CH-00033 03A01-9601-CH-00033 Trial Court Judge: Inman		Court of Appeals	05/30/96
03A01-9601-CV-00003 03A01-9601-CV-00003 Trial Court Judge: Inman		Court of Appeals	05/30/96
Ester v. Hayes And 03A01-9602-CV-00054 Trial Court Judge: Inman		Court of Appeals	05/30/96
The Recent Case of Gene v. Aaby v. Judy Aaby Strange, ____S.W.2D____, 03A01-9511-CV-00403 Trial Court Judge: Inman	Bradley	Court of Appeals	05/30/96
03A01-9507-JV-00211 03A01-9507-JV-00211 Trial Court Judge: C. Van Deacon	Bradley	Court of Appeals	05/28/96
02A01-9411-CH-00261 02A01-9411-CH-00261 Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/28/96
02A01-9411-CH-00262 02A01-9411-CH-00262 Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/28/96
02A01-9511-CH-00258 02A01-9511-CH-00258 Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/28/96
Martin H. Aussenberg, v. Bruce S. Kramer, David J. Cocke, and Borod and Kramer 02A01-9411-CH-00262 Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard Trial Court Judge: Chancellor C. Neal Small In this case, Plaintiff, Martin H. Aussenberg (“Aussenberg”), appeals the trial court’s valuation of his former partnership’s work-in-progress and accounts receivable as well as its finding regarding Aussenberg’s interest in the partnership’s accounts receivable and work-inprogress. We affirm the decision of the trial court.		Court of Appeals	05/26/96
01A01-9601-CV-00020 01A01-9601-CV-00020 Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall	Sumner	Court of Appeals	05/24/96
01A01-9512-CH-00543 01A01-9512-CH-00543 Trial Court Judge: C. K. Smith	Macon	Court of Appeals	05/24/96
01A01-9512-CH-00572 01A01-9512-CH-00572 Trial Court Judge: Ellen H. Lyle	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/24/96
01A01-9510-CH-00489 01A01-9510-CH-00489 Trial Court Judge: H. Denmark Bell		Court of Appeals	05/24/96
01A01-9510-CV-00434 01A01-9510-CV-00434 Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/24/96