John Brown, v. County of Shelby
This appeal concerns an action by the appellant, John Brown (Brown), to recover workers’ compensation benefits from his employer, the appellee, County of Shelby (County), who has not elected to come within the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law. Brown alleges that he sustained on-the-job injuries while employed by the County as a counselor at the Shelby County Jail. The record reflects that the County has implemented its own policy whereby it compensates its employees for on-the-job injuries and relies to some extent on the Workers’ Compensation Act as a guide in determining benefits. At trial, it was established that under said policy, the County had paid Brown’s temporary disability benefits and that Brown sought only permanent disability benefits and the medical expenses incurred from Dr. John P. Howser. The trial court awarded a permanent partial disability of 7% to the body as a whole and entered a judgment for Brown in the amount of $5,863.68. No award was made for Dr. Howser’s expenses. Brown appeals, identifying the issues for review as follows: |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
John H. Fournier v. M. V. Tichenor and Bowling, Bowling, and Associates
Plaintiff-Appellant, John H. Fournier (“Fournier), appeals the order of the trial court entering summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, M. V. Tichenor (“Tichenor”) and Bowling, Bowling & Associates (“Law Firm”), on Fournier’s claims for negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
AMC-Tennessee, Inc. v. Hillcrest Healthcare
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ella Pruett vs. Wal-Mart Stores
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Bryan vs. Tent, Inc., d/b/a: University Medical Ctr.
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Millsaps vs. Robertson-Vaughn Construction
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
Bryan vs. Tent, Inc., d/b/a: University Medical Ctr.
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9705-JV-00234
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Ferrell vs. Blue Bird of Tennessee
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Cheatham vs. Cheatham
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Jones vs. Culpepper
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
Deborah Plunk vs. Edward Plunk
|
Chester | Court of Appeals | |
Cindy Stubbs vs. Woodrow Stubbs
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
Walter Biddle vs. Norfolk Southern Corp. et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
In re: Jeffrey Morgan
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Nilsen vs. Black
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Ames vs. Phillips Builders
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lemasters vs. Ross
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frazier vs. George
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Zanetis vs. McMackin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Zanetis vs. McMackin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Alexander Friedmann, v. Charles Bass, et al.
This appeal involves a prison disciplinary proceeding. After being found guilty of engaging in an unauthorized monetary transaction, the prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County alleging that the disciplinary proceeding violated his due process rights. The trial court granted the prison officials’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the petition on the ground that the petitioner had failed to make out a due process claim as a matter of law. We affirm the summary judgment in accordance with Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10(b).1 |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Friedmann vs. Bass
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ringling vs. TN. Bd. of Paroles
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |
