Phillip Hall vs. Donal Campbell, et al
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9707-CH-00348
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Long, et. ux. vs. Landmark Television of TN
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Fagg vs. County of Franklin
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
John Du Ban vs. Gary Wilkinson
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
07-93-017-CC
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ardie Trice vs. David Hall, et al
|
Chester | Court of Appeals | |
Commercial Credit vs. Est. of Arthur Smith, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Barbara Pierce vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Phares vs. Myatt
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Wortham vs. West Meade Corp.
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Cathy P. Sprayberry-Gravitt, v. David Baker, Director of Schools for the Clarksville-Montgomery County Schools, et al.
We have reviewed appellee's Petition to Rehear. Counsel correctly points out that the Education Improvement Act of 1992 specified certain duties in the County Administration of education. The two sections cited [T.C.A. 49-2- 301(f)(10) and T.C.A. 49-2-203(a)(1)] do refer to "recommendation" of the superintendent to the local board of education. It is the duty of the superintendent to recommend teachers who qualify and the board "elects" such teachers to tenure status as it deems appropriate. |
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Est. of William Burton, Jr., Deceased
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
England & Whitley vs. Select Sires
|
Giles | Court of Appeals | |
Wilder vs. Rains
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
Waddey vs. Waddey
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Montague vs. Dept. of Corrections
|
Court of Appeals | ||
National Healthcare L.P. vs. Sparta Medical Investors
|
Court of Appeals | ||
In the Matter of Tiffany Harrell & Matthew Miller (In the matter of T.J.H.)
|
Humphreys | Court of Appeals | |
Harpeth Valley Utilities Dist. vs. Metro Gov't
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
G.E. Capital vs. Belinda Young
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Godfrey vs. Godfrey
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Judith Ann Warren Taylor, v. Michael Raymond Taylor
Judith Ann Taylor (“Wife”) filed a complaint for divorce against Michael Raymond Taylor (“Husband”) and also sought an injunction prohibiting Husband from dissipating marital assets. Husband filed an answer and counter-complaint for divorce. The trial court granted Wife the divorce on the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct and awarded her rehabilitative alimony, partial attorney fees, and 60% of the marital assets. Husband appeals and raises the following issues:whether the trial court erred (1) in awarding Wife rehabilitative alimony of $1,300 per month for 60 months; (2) in ordering Husband to pay $20,000 as alimony in solido for Wife’s attorney fees; (3) in ordering Husband to pay a portion of Wife’s health insurance coverage; (4) in requiring Husband to maintain a life insurance policy which exceeds the total amount of child support owed; and (5) in dividing the marital property of the parties. Wife submits the additional issue of whether she is due attorney fees on appeal. For the reasons stated below, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Norman Mayes, et ux., v. Claude Yow, et ux., and William Scarboro, et ux.
This appeal results from a suit brought by Normal Mayes and his wife, Ruth Mayes, against Claude Yow and his wife, Frances Yow, Willard Scarbro and his wife, Cleo Scarbro, who was added as a party Defendant subsequent to the filing of the original complaint, and Partners & Associates, Inc. |
Knox | Court of Appeals |
