COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Harrison, et. al. vs. Laursen, et. al. 01A01-9705-CH-00238 Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton	Giles	Court of Appeals	02/20/98
Geyer vs. Geyer 01A01-9707-CH-00372 Trial Court Judge: Gerald L. Ewell, Sr.	Coffee	Court of Appeals	02/20/98
Residents Against Ind. Landfill vs. Dept. of Environment 01A01-9507-CH-00311 Trial Court Judge: C. Allen High	Davidson	Court of Appeals	02/20/98
Devore vs. Deloitte & Touche 01A01-9602-CH-00073 Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt	Davidson	Court of Appeals	02/20/98
02A01-9707-CV-00152 02A01-9707-CV-00152 Trial Court Judge: R. Lee Moore Jr.	Lake	Court of Appeals	02/17/98
State of Tennessee v. David Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn 03C01-9502-CR-00052 Authoring Judge: Per Curiam Trial Court Judge: Judge Mayo L. Mashburn Order on Petition To Rehear Upon consideration of the petition to rehear filed by the appellants Davey Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn, this Court is of the opinion that the petition should be and the same is hereby denied.	Bradley	Court of Appeals	02/17/98
Joseph Nolen v. Amy Nolen M2002-00138-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Don R. Ash Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris	Hickman	Court of Appeals	02/14/98
Hollis vs. Hollis 01A01-9704-CH-00178 Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Culp vs. J.B. Hinson & Pevahouse 01A01-9707-CV-00307 Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton	Wayne	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Carson vs. Agri-Products Special Markets 01A01-9708-CV-00420	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Sherrell vs. Sherrell 01A01-9703-CH-00131 Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton	Lawrence	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Sanders, et. ux. vs. Mansfield, et. al. 01A01-9705-CH-00222 Trial Court Judge: Ben H. Cantrell	Lincoln	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Child Support Svcs. vs. Russell 01A01-9706-JV-00267 Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff	Davidson	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
West vs. Dept. of Correction, et. al. 01A01-9706-CV-00243 Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz	Davidson	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Little, et. al. vs. Hogan, et. al. 01A01-9707-CV-00291		Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Karr vs. Gibson 01A01-9605-CH-00220 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	02/13/98
Mildred Daniel vs. James Daniel 02A01-9606-CH-00135 Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	02/12/98
Robert Martin vs. Union Planters 02A01-9708-CV-00179 Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier	Shelby	Court of Appeals	02/12/98
McGlothlin vs. Bristol 03A01-9706-CV-00236		Court of Appeals	02/11/98
Knoll vs. Knoll 03A01-9707-CH-00275		Court of Appeals	02/10/98
Worley vs. State 03A01-9708-JV-00366		Court of Appeals	02/10/98
Stephens vs. Revco 03A01-9708-CV-00351		Court of Appeals	02/10/98
Cheri Owens Tuncay v. Engin Halif Tuncay - Concurring 02A01-9709-CH-00209 Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford Trial Court Judge: Chancellor D. J. Alissandratos This is a divorce case. Plaintiff-appellant Cheri Owens Tuncay was granted a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. Mrs. Tuncay appeals the trial court’s division of the marital debts as well as the court’s failure to award her alimony beyond $5,000 in attorney fees.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	02/09/98
Donald Neil Pierce, v. Branda Ann Radford Pierce 03A01-9707-GS-00250 Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas A. Austin This is a divorce case. On appeal, Brenda Pierce (wife) raises the issues of whether the tril court erred by refusing to grant her periodic alimony, by failing to grant her the divorce, and by failing to grant her discretionary costs and attorney's fees. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.	Roane	Court of Appeals	02/09/98
Larry Stephen Roseberry, v. Janis Roseberry 03A01-9706-CH-00237 Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray Trial Court Judge: Judge Earle G. Murphy In this divorce action, the appellant (husband) appeals from the judgment of the trial court questioning the amount of child support he was ordered to pay, the division of marital property and alimony, including the amount, nature, and duration. The appellee (wife) seeks attorney fees for this appeal. No issue is presented relating to the granting of the divorce. We note that at the time of the trial, the husbanc had more than enough life insurance in force to satisfy this requirement.	Knox	Court of Appeals	02/09/98